Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reynolds 708 frame

    Hi

    I am trying to find information on a Reynolds 708 frame - I think this tubing as not manufactured for very long. Where is the Reynolds hierachy does it sit? I am being offered a new old stock frame quite cheaply and thought it would make a good basis for a tourer.

    Any thoughts???

  2. #2
    Senior Member sydney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,428
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dukerider
    Hi

    I am trying to find information on a Reynolds 708 frame - I think this tubing as not manufactured for very long. Where is the Reynolds hierachy does it sit? I am being offered a new old stock frame quite cheaply and thought it would make a good basis for a tourer.

    Any thoughts???
    If it's got everythig you need on it for a tourer,that's more important than the spec on some obscure tubing.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Nessism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Torrance, CA
    My Bikes
    Homebuilt steel
    Posts
    2,324
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dukerider
    Hi

    I am trying to find information on a Reynolds 708 frame - I think this tubing as not manufactured for very long. Where is the Reynolds hierachy does it sit? I am being offered a new old stock frame quite cheaply and thought it would make a good basis for a tourer.

    Any thoughts???
    708 came in standard tube sizes, not oversize which has taken over the market. The tubes are thicker than the more common 531 but not quite as thick as the 531 Super Tourist tubeset. The main feature of the 708 tubeset is the addition of full length longitudinal ribs inside the tubes - similar to Columbus TSX only the ribs are not spiral.

    My guess is that a 708 frameset would make a fine light duty touring rig but may be a little flexy for loaded touring with a heavy rider.

    Hope this helps.

    Ed

  4. #4
    Retrogrouch in Training bostontrevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Knee-deep in the day-to-day
    Posts
    5,484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My understanding is that 708 offered superior rigidity over 531 for touring loads and that it was specifically designed for such use.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Nessism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Torrance, CA
    My Bikes
    Homebuilt steel
    Posts
    2,324
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bostontrevor
    My understanding is that 708 offered superior rigidity over 531 for touring loads and that it was specifically designed for such use.
    According to a Reynolds catalogue I have in front of me:

    Reynolds 708 CLASSIC

    "A receint development from Reynolds, the name describes the purpose.
    The main tubes of this set have a new and ingenious inernal profile.
    The profile is designed to maximise lateral stiffness and strength in the direction of the known loadings, which result from the punishing road surfaces and the extreme rider applied deflection loadings experienced on the brutial classic racing courses."

    No doubt 708 is stiffer than regular 531, however 531 SUPER TOURIST is quite a bit thicker yet which makes it a better choice for loaded touring.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks

    I have purchased but not collected the frame. Looking forward to checking it. Can you tell from th ecatalogue when this tubing was available? I am keen to know the age of the frame. It is new old stock and all I know is that is has been sitting in a shop somewhere.

    many thanks

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks. What you say is true but I was merely intersted in what I might be getting for admittedly a small amount of money.
    I bought it.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi,
    i used to ride a 531 .
    This is all from memory but i believe the 708 frames were not successful because they lost their rigidity very early in their life.
    on this basis i'd be very wary of a 2nd hand 708.
    hope this helps.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Liverpool, England
    My Bikes
    R J Quinn road bike with Reynolds 531cs tubing, Lombardo Hiker 6061 aluminium tubing, Dawes road bike 531c, Dawes road bike 531st, Peugeot road bike reynolds 753
    Posts
    50
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    how did that 708 turn out? how does it compare on the reynolds scale of other tubesets? im thinking of buying one for myself to try out.. but there is a parcity of information on it. thanks

  10. #10
    Old fart JohnDThompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Appleton WI
    My Bikes
    Several, mostly not name brands.
    Posts
    13,143
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by greenpeter2001 View Post
    This is all from memory but i believe the 708 frames were not successful because they lost their rigidity very early in their life.
    I doubt that very much. That steel loses rigidity over time is a persistent myth, but a myth nonetheless. Far more likely is that frame fashion preferences moved on from steel tubes in classic diameters to non-ferrous tubes and oversize diameters.

  11. #11
    aka Tom Reingold noglider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    West Village, New York City
    My Bikes
    too many
    Posts
    20,809
    Mentioned
    113 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by greenpeter2001 View Post
    Hi,
    i used to ride a 531 .
    This is all from memory but i believe the 708 frames were not successful because they lost their rigidity very early in their life.
    on this basis i'd be very wary of a 2nd hand 708.
    hope this helps.
    I know I'm responding to a nine year old post, but steel does not lose rigidity with time, despite urban legends in the bike world.
    You don't read my signature anyway, do you?

    Tom Reingold, noglider@pobox.com
    Residences: West Village, New York City and High Falls, NY
    Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    26,176
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by noglider View Post
    I know I'm responding to a nine year old post, but steel does not lose rigidity with time, despite urban legends in the bike world.
    Yeah, that nonsense myth was used by a lot of riders to justify buying a new bike.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,420
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the finest British production tourer was 708 Raleigh Randonneur

  14. #14
    Senior Member paulkal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Holland
    My Bikes
    2007 Nagasawa with C-Record, 1992 Duell with Croce D'aune/Chorus, three Gazelles, M5 recumbent
    Posts
    779
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a NOS Reynolds 708 tube set that one day I plan to build into a frame.
    The ribs do look interesting.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •