Drivetrain recommendations for a 3x1
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 398
Bikes: Swobo Sanchez 3x1
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Drivetrain recommendations for a 3x1
i have my bike set up as a 3x1 right now. i finally got it working fairly well with some parts bin stuff, except for the chain tensioner. i had mismatched crankarms for a while, then i got a 122 bottom bracket to fit all the gears on my Tourney XT triple (idk anything about these cranks, but like them!!)
on getting my chainline correct (i think) i found that my front derailleur was pretty hecked up. and i think independent of that problem, it wasn't shifting into my littlest ring. this is all friction shifting.
now that i've had it working and i know how much i like it (it's a lot btw) i'm trying to decide if i want to get some external BB cranks, probably just deore. one of my questions is, will a 2 piece external bearing crankset potentially cause me any extra problems with setup, chainline, front derailleur etc? or will it wind up being easier?
rear is staying the same for now. my main concern is that as things are, no front derailleur will pull the chain far enough in to shift to my granny/hill gear. i'm not really sure if this is true or not, and i realize a shift down from a compact 34t chainring isn't the best. but can someone help me identify the features i need in a front derailleur, and what extra setup i need to do? and if a more modern crankset would make this way easier, just say the word...
i've been using a top pull with a cable stop on my seat tube, but i'd use a bottom pull if it's possible (???) an extra factor however is that the front derailleur can cut down on my rear tire clearance, and i'd like to stick with a 32c.
also if anyone is curious, my gearing is 42-34-26 x 13 right now, but i'm really liking the sound of 42-32-24 x 12. my rear wheel was a 130mm spaced 9 speed, i spaced it down to 120mm ish by removing the cassette lockring and using the right sized seatpost clamp to keep my rear cog on.
on getting my chainline correct (i think) i found that my front derailleur was pretty hecked up. and i think independent of that problem, it wasn't shifting into my littlest ring. this is all friction shifting.
now that i've had it working and i know how much i like it (it's a lot btw) i'm trying to decide if i want to get some external BB cranks, probably just deore. one of my questions is, will a 2 piece external bearing crankset potentially cause me any extra problems with setup, chainline, front derailleur etc? or will it wind up being easier?
rear is staying the same for now. my main concern is that as things are, no front derailleur will pull the chain far enough in to shift to my granny/hill gear. i'm not really sure if this is true or not, and i realize a shift down from a compact 34t chainring isn't the best. but can someone help me identify the features i need in a front derailleur, and what extra setup i need to do? and if a more modern crankset would make this way easier, just say the word...
i've been using a top pull with a cable stop on my seat tube, but i'd use a bottom pull if it's possible (???) an extra factor however is that the front derailleur can cut down on my rear tire clearance, and i'd like to stick with a 32c.
also if anyone is curious, my gearing is 42-34-26 x 13 right now, but i'm really liking the sound of 42-32-24 x 12. my rear wheel was a 130mm spaced 9 speed, i spaced it down to 120mm ish by removing the cassette lockring and using the right sized seatpost clamp to keep my rear cog on.
Last edited by bike_galpal; 08-12-17 at 05:12 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,975
Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1299 Post(s)
Liked 739 Times
in
534 Posts
you may need a 127.5mm spindle BB.
how does the gap between the crank tips and chain stays look? Even? uneven? really close on both sides?
and get a better set-up on that freehub, bub.
spacers, cog, spacers, retainer ring. doing that correctly will help sort out your chain line, AFTER you sort out the front line.
you can rob some freehub cog spacers out of an old, trashed cassette, eh?
how does the gap between the crank tips and chain stays look? Even? uneven? really close on both sides?
and get a better set-up on that freehub, bub.
spacers, cog, spacers, retainer ring. doing that correctly will help sort out your chain line, AFTER you sort out the front line.
you can rob some freehub cog spacers out of an old, trashed cassette, eh?
Last edited by maddog34; 08-12-17 at 05:25 PM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,806
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
If I understand your 3x1 correctly, you have an 80's Takagi Tourney XT triple crank to a single 13t cog in the back. Your first step is to measure the chainline (google Sheldon Brown chainline) that is a measurement from the center of the seat tube to the middle cog. That will let you know if your spindle is too short. For mountain bike cranks, it is around 47.5mm (47.5-50). If it is road, it is 45mm, but the quick research I did has the Tourney crank as a touring crank.
As for your front derailleur problem, if your chainline is less than it should be (too short a spindle) you will have a problem and need a longer spindle. You can get bottom pull mountain bike front derailleurs. An older Shimano XT 737 might be a good choice for your setup.
John
Edit added: Yes a bottom pull will cut down on your tire width, especially with a mountain bike front derailleur. Also, the wider the bb spindle the more interference you would get because the cable attach arm will be pulled in more for the large chainring so top pull might be better. You can cheat a little on the chainline if you get a front derailleur for a larger diameter seat tube and offset the shims to bring it closer. I have also taken a file out judiciously to get a derailleur ever so slightly more travel when I just need a little bit.
As for your front derailleur problem, if your chainline is less than it should be (too short a spindle) you will have a problem and need a longer spindle. You can get bottom pull mountain bike front derailleurs. An older Shimano XT 737 might be a good choice for your setup.
John
Edit added: Yes a bottom pull will cut down on your tire width, especially with a mountain bike front derailleur. Also, the wider the bb spindle the more interference you would get because the cable attach arm will be pulled in more for the large chainring so top pull might be better. You can cheat a little on the chainline if you get a front derailleur for a larger diameter seat tube and offset the shims to bring it closer. I have also taken a file out judiciously to get a derailleur ever so slightly more travel when I just need a little bit.
Last edited by 70sSanO; 08-12-17 at 06:24 PM.
#4
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 398
Bikes: Swobo Sanchez 3x1
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
thank you!! what about the crankset, will that cause me any extra problems? i've heard chainline adjustment can have a few more limitations?
also unfortunately that front derailleur will still not clear my rear tire.
Edit added: Yes a bottom pull will cut down on your tire width, especially with a mountain bike front derailleur. Also, the wider the bb spindle the more interference you would get because the cable attach arm will be pulled in more for the large chainring so top pull might be better. You can cheat a little on the chainline if you get a front derailleur for a larger diameter seat tube and offset the shims to bring it closer. I have also taken a file out judiciously to get a derailleur ever so slightly more travel when I just need a little bit.
ahh ok, thats a really good tip, thanks! would it also increase the travel a little if i were to use a braze on adapter and direct mount derailleur?
also unfortunately that front derailleur will still not clear my rear tire.
Edit added: Yes a bottom pull will cut down on your tire width, especially with a mountain bike front derailleur. Also, the wider the bb spindle the more interference you would get because the cable attach arm will be pulled in more for the large chainring so top pull might be better. You can cheat a little on the chainline if you get a front derailleur for a larger diameter seat tube and offset the shims to bring it closer. I have also taken a file out judiciously to get a derailleur ever so slightly more travel when I just need a little bit.
#5
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
i have my bike set up as a 3x1 right now. i finally got it working fairly well with some parts bin stuff, except for the chain tensioner. i had mismatched crankarms for a while, then i got a 122 bottom bracket to fit all the gears on my Tourney XT triple (idk anything about these cranks, but like them!!)
...
also if anyone is curious, my gearing is 42-34-26 x 13 right now, but i'm really liking the sound of 42-32-24 x 12. my rear wheel was a 130mm spaced 9 speed, i spaced it down to 120mm ish by removing the cassette lockring and using the right sized seatpost clamp to keep my rear cog on.
...
also if anyone is curious, my gearing is 42-34-26 x 13 right now, but i'm really liking the sound of 42-32-24 x 12. my rear wheel was a 130mm spaced 9 speed, i spaced it down to 120mm ish by removing the cassette lockring and using the right sized seatpost clamp to keep my rear cog on.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,806
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
thank you!! what about the crankset, will that cause me any extra problems? i've heard chainline adjustment can have a few more limitations?
also unfortunately that front derailleur will still not clear my rear tire.
ahh ok, thats a really good tip, thanks! would it also increase the travel a little if i were to use a braze on adapter and direct mount derailleur?
also unfortunately that front derailleur will still not clear my rear tire.
ahh ok, thats a really good tip, thanks! would it also increase the travel a little if i were to use a braze on adapter and direct mount derailleur?
As for a braze-on, I don't think you can manipulate it enough laterally(?), in and out so to speak. Your issue is the seat tube.
I still think you need to address the spindle width to give you the right chainline and go from there. The only other reason you can't shift to the small chainring would be if your 13t is in the normal small position, and not centered on the freehub, because the angle is too severe. Same effect if you are running middle ring to small cog and want to shift to the small chainring.
John
Last edited by 70sSanO; 08-13-17 at 11:03 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fuji8
Bicycle Mechanics
9
06-06-13 12:39 AM