Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Rear wheel deflecting towards DS when tire is inflated

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Rear wheel deflecting towards DS when tire is inflated

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-24, 08:40 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Rear wheel deflecting towards DS when tire is inflated

the wheel is a 28 spoke, 3x both sides. White Ind. T11, cx-ray or aerolite (don't remember), Velocity Quill
the wheel is perfectly dished when the tire is off, or deflated. but once inflated (40mm tire), it deflects towards the drive side by about 2mm
i was thinking of rebuilding using DT competition (2.0-1.8) for the DS for their heavier gauge. since i have to replace some spokes anyway due to chain drop.
or just dish the wheel to the NDS to compensate?

Last edited by The_Snail; 01-23-24 at 08:48 PM.
The_Snail is offline  
Likes For The_Snail:
Old 01-23-24, 08:56 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,729

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,595 Times in 1,438 Posts
Inflating tires compresses the rim. The effect is related to the pressure x width, along with the rim's weight. (higher weight means greater cross section area, thus greater resistance to compression).

Since dished wheels are asymmetrical, the effect on tension is also, and the deflection is expected. If you plan on using these same tires at similar pressures, you can compensate so it moves to where you actually want it.

OTOH this has been going on forever, and the difference is probably meaningless in the scheme of things.
FBinNY is offline  
Likes For FBinNY:
Old 01-24-24, 09:25 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,100

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4212 Post(s)
Liked 3,883 Times in 2,318 Posts
Redish/tension the wheel/spokes with the tire on and pressured up. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
Old 01-24-24, 10:26 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,910

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,933 Times in 2,558 Posts
This has probably been happening on my bikes (well, not my fix gears) for the past 50 years. Never noticed. I build my wheels with dish for a centered wheel, no tire. Put the tires on. Blow up. Put wheels on bikes, centering the tire between the chainstays. Adjust the brakes to the rim; both the caliper and the pad heights. Ride.

So I guess I've been riding rear wheels askew by 2 mm forever. And unconsciously compensated every time I sat up and road no-hands. I guess all my geared bikes have rear ends that drift to the left. Funny. And I guess I've sorta noticed that the pads don't quite sit the same heights on the caliper arms.

And thinking more - yeah the tire has always wanted to sit closer to the DS chainstay on my ti custom with its vertical drops, 130 spacing and 9-speed wheels. I bet the stays on my rear fender aren't equal length (which I believe I've noticed putting on new ones). I think I'll try dishing my rear wheels 2mm less next build. Perhaps my bikes will ride a little straighter, a small burden may be lifted from my psyche and perhaps the Earth's rotation will be spared a little wobble.
79pmooney is offline  
Old 01-24-24, 10:50 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
grumpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,245
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 505 Post(s)
Liked 437 Times in 336 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
OTOH this has been going on forever, and the difference is probably meaningless in the scheme of things.
I've built plenty of wheels, trued/dished many more, I can't believe I've never even thought of this, it's so obvious. I'd expect that working to a tolerance of max 1.0 mm I'd have noticed the difference, at least with close clearance road frames, but I guess not.
grumpus is online now  
Old 01-24-24, 10:56 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
grumpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,245
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 505 Post(s)
Liked 437 Times in 336 Posts
Originally Posted by The_Snail
i was thinking of rebuilding using DT competition (2.0-1.8) for the DS for their heavier gauge.
That's lighter than the cx-ray, which is effectively 2.0 mm plain gauge.
grumpus is online now  
Old 01-24-24, 11:34 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,729

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,595 Times in 1,438 Posts
This is the problem when people start measuring stuff and suddenly discover how imprecise the real world is.

OTOH the deflection was less of an issue BITD, since we were riding narrower tires on wheels not dished over as far.

In any case, that nobody ever noticed an issue riding these "wrongly dished" wheels, is proof that that the working tolerances are greater than most believe.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Likes For FBinNY:
Old 01-24-24, 11:55 AM
  #8  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 282
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Liked 47 Times in 34 Posts
Wow, I never contemplated this! I think I only checked the dish a handful of times on the frame when I first started riding in my early teens. That was an old 5-speed clunker, and I simply turned the wheel around on the frame to get a general feel. I never had much luck trueing, rounding, and dishing on the frame, especially with the tire on. Luckily, by college, I had access to a trueing stand.
kcjc is offline  
Old 01-24-24, 02:55 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,890

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3245 Post(s)
Liked 2,093 Times in 1,185 Posts
This was fascinating. It occurred to me that I only and quickly check for true on a new wheel and only once on a mail order wheel have had to fix it. I've purchased 2 pairs of carbon wheels in the past year for my mt. bikes, made the (possibly stupid) assumption they were true out of the box so did not check, mounted the tubeless tires and put them on the bike. There's a bit more tolerance with 2.4" mt. bike tires, but when I spun the wheel to get sealant moved around, they looked true so left them alone. Haven't done a new road wheel in 5 years. After that if I noticed a road wheel running out of true after some use, I stuck it on the truing stand and fixed it, WHILE THE TIRE WAS ON THE WHEEL AND INFLATED. I would never bother removing a tire to re-true but as well, never had to deal with a wheel with no tire having a different position than a wheel with an inflated tire. Good info to know.
Steve B. is online now  
Old 01-24-24, 05:33 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
70sSanO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,809

Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,168 Times in 1,324 Posts
I had never heard of this before. But I had a similar strange phenomenon happen to me.

A few years ago I took a 130mm OLD and reduced it to sub 128mm with some creative manipulating on the DS. Put it on the stand without a tire, re-centered it, making sure it was dished properly and stressed relieved.

A couple months ago the RD cage looked a bit too close to the spokes, so I put the wheel with the tire on the stand and the dishing was off by over a mm toward the DS. My first thought was I must have done something stupid when I re-centered the rim years ago.

Now, maybe not.

John

Last edited by 70sSanO; 01-24-24 at 05:37 PM.
70sSanO is offline  
Old 01-24-24, 07:53 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,910

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,933 Times in 2,558 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
Redish/tension the wheel/spokes with the tire on and pressured up. Andy
Or ... ride wheels without dish! Yeah, yeah, dish allows lots of cogs, discs ... But wheels without (or with very little) are better wheels. Don't believe me? Take a hard right corner on a 130 OLD wheel with tons of cogs, then take the same corner on an identical wheel except single speed and no or very little dish. Bike simply feels more solid, even if you use the same light NDS spokes on the DS.

Derailleurs are great, But with dish, vulnerability to DS crashes and need to keep exposed chains in very good shape, not ideal. The ideal geared bike (maybe a century or two away) will be a different system entirely.

And another point. To keep your dish optimum riding gravel AND road, you need to re-true every time you change tire pressure! Get rid of those those derailleurs and make your bike a perfect dish!
79pmooney is offline  
Old 01-25-24, 10:31 AM
  #12  
Senior member
 
Dan Burkhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,119
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 659 Times in 372 Posts
Originally Posted by 79pmooney
Or ... ride wheels without dish! Yeah, yeah, dish allows lots of cogs, discs ... But wheels without (or with very little) are better wheels. Don't believe me? Take a hard right corner on a 130 OLD wheel with tons of cogs, then take the same corner on an identical wheel except single speed and no or very little dish. Bike simply feels more solid, even if you use the same light NDS spokes on the DS.

Derailleurs are great, But with dish, vulnerability to DS crashes and need to keep exposed chains in very good shape, not ideal. The ideal geared bike (maybe a century or two away) will be a different system entirely.

And another point. To keep your dish optimum riding gravel AND road, you need to re-true every time you change tire pressure! Get rid of those those derailleurs and make your bike a perfect dish!
(Channeling Fietsbob) A Rohloff is 100% symetrical. Just sayin
Dan Burkhart is offline  
Old 01-25-24, 11:20 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,910

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,933 Times in 2,558 Posts
I might simply start building my rear wheels with no dish - fix gear, 1mm short on dish - 7-speed 126 OLD wheels and 2mm short on dish on my 9-speed and more 130 wheels. Tired and aired - ought to be plenty close enough. Easier to build also.
79pmooney is offline  
Old 01-25-24, 11:24 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,910

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,933 Times in 2,558 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Burkhart
(Channeling Fietsbob) A Rohloff is 100% symetrical. Just sayin
Yes. But it is not the performance equal of modern derailleurs. We are still an "ah ha!" away from the ultimate.
79pmooney is offline  
Likes For 79pmooney:
Old 01-25-24, 06:09 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,729

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,595 Times in 1,438 Posts
I get that this is an OMG moment for many, but some perspective helps.

First of all, there's a big difference between an observed phenomenon, and a problem. That nobody's talked about this for however long as we've been riding dished wheels should be a clue to its (in)significance.

However, for those who obsess over stuff like this, a reminder ---- 90% of the time we're riding across a sloped surface, moving the bike's point of conract 1-3mm or so to the left. So, rather than "fix" the rear wheel, you might want to dish the front.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 01-26-24, 09:51 AM
  #16  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,369

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6222 Post(s)
Liked 4,222 Times in 2,368 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
This is the problem when people start measuring stuff and suddenly discover how imprecise the real world is.

OTOH the deflection was less of an issue BITD, since we were riding narrower tires on wheels not dished over as far.

In any case, that nobody ever noticed an issue riding these "wrongly dished" wheels, is proof that that the working tolerances are greater than most believe.
This is not a common problem no matter if people are measuring stuff or not. For decades we have had visual indicators of a centered wheel mounted on the bicycle, i.e. rim brake pads. Deflection of the rim to the drive side isn’t something that people have reported in the past. I have mounted many wheels without tires into a frame during buildups and used them to align the brakes. I’ve never observed a shift of the wheel center to either side after mounting a tire.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.