Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Switch to loose balls in headset

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Switch to loose balls in headset

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-05, 09:33 AM
  #1  
Car(e) Free!
Thread Starter
 
koine2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 851

Bikes: Homebuilt Nashbar Steel MTB; 1988 Schwinn Premis

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Switch to loose balls in headset

I'm considering switching to loose balls in my bicycles headsets. It's currently a retainer, and I just don't like those. Is this an acceptable thing to do? The headset on my KHS is a Marin labelled Tange aheadset. My Bridgestone RB-4, since the rest of the bike is Shimano 600, I'd assume is a 600 Threaded headset. It's really the Bridgestone I'd like to change out, since the original bearings are OE, based on how grimey and gellified they were (I bought it used), and even after a cleaning, they're pretty choppy unless I allow for some play. The races and cups look fine.
koine2002 is offline  
Old 12-07-05, 09:56 AM
  #2  
Chronic Tai Shan
 
ofofhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PHL/BAL
Posts: 1,118

Bikes: Pake Single Speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by koine2002
I'm considering switching to loose balls in my bicycles headsets. It's currently a retainer, and I just don't like those. Is this an acceptable thing to do? The headset on my KHS is a Marin labelled Tange aheadset. My Bridgestone RB-4, since the rest of the bike is Shimano 600, I'd assume is a 600 Threaded headset. It's really the Bridgestone I'd like to change out, since the original bearings are OE, based on how grimey and gellified they were (I bought it used), and even after a cleaning, they're pretty choppy unless I allow for some play. The races and cups look fine.
It will be one of the best things you can do for your headset. Use grade 25 bearing balls.
ofofhy is offline  
Old 12-07-05, 11:22 AM
  #3  
Listen to me
 
powers2b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lexus Texas
Posts: 2,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
By eliminating the bearing retainer you will be able to add more ball bearings.
More balls = less load for each ball = longer bearing life

Enjoy
powers2b is offline  
Old 12-07-05, 12:45 PM
  #4  
8speed DinoSORAs
 
Ed Holland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oxford, UK or Mountain View, Ca
Posts: 2,749
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Absolutely no pitfalls to this, go ahead with confidence.

I assembled one headset recently, supplied with bearing retainers to find that the retainer actually prevented free running of the headset - yes the retainer was inserted with the correct orientation. I reassembled without the retainers and extra bearing balls, leaving a silky smooth steering action....

Ed
__________________
Get a bicycle. You will certainly not regret it, if you live.
Ed Holland is offline  
Old 12-07-05, 01:27 PM
  #5  
Gone, but not forgotten
 
Sheldon Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,301

Bikes: See: https://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Ed Holland
Absolutely no pitfalls to this, go ahead with confidence.
If you have access to a work stand, this job is a lot easier if you mount the bike in the stand upside down.

Sheldon "Topsy Turvy" Brown
Code:
+----------------------------------------------+
|  Check out my wife's tale of her experience  |
|  in the 1975 Paris-Brest-Paris at:           |
|     https://harrietfell.com/PBP1975.html      |
+----------------------------------------------+
Sheldon Brown is offline  
Old 12-07-05, 03:19 PM
  #6  
Klaatu barada nikto
 
cascade168's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
BikeToolsEtc has a nice little reference cheat sheet in their catalog for replacing caged balls with loose. I will paste it up here:

" Component Loose Bearing Sizes (Exceptions Exist)
Components..................Size..........................Bearing Count

Bottom brackets.............1/4".........................11 each side
1" headset.....................5/32".......................25 per cup
1 1/8" headset................5/32 or 3/16"............20-28 per cup
1 1/4" headset................5/32 or 3/16"............26-31 per cup
front hub........................3/16"......................10 per side
rear hub.........................1/4"........................9 per side
pedals............................5/32 or 1/8".............10-15 per side
SPD pedals.....................3/32".......................lots
If in doubt, fill space with bearings and remove one.
It is possible to replace the balls in a bearing retainer that's in
good shape. Just pop 'em out and pop in new ones of the same
size. "


As they say, "exceptions exist", but I have yet to find one myself.
It's a pretty good list.
cascade168 is offline  
Old 12-07-05, 10:19 PM
  #7  
Car(e) Free!
Thread Starter
 
koine2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 851

Bikes: Homebuilt Nashbar Steel MTB; 1988 Schwinn Premis

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks everyone. I will do the switch as soon as I can get the LB's to put in. We're snowed in with 1/2 inch of snow! I don't dare trust the drivers here in Oklahoma with such things--even with only 1/2 inch--they stop for no apparent reason while driving up a snow/ice covered hill for pete's sake!
koine2002 is offline  
Old 12-08-05, 07:04 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
FLBandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 998
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was wondering about this for Bottom Brackets. My daughter has an older Schwinn that I just redid the BB on. It seemed like loose bearings would be better there also.
FLBandit is offline  
Old 12-08-05, 12:10 PM
  #9  
ride, paint, ride
 
simplify's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,204

Bikes: Cannondale R300 Caad2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by FLBandit
I was wondering about this for Bottom Brackets. My daughter has an older Schwinn that I just redid the BB on. It seemed like loose bearings would be better there also.
Absolutely true. I couldn't believe the difference when I tossed the retainers in my bottom bracket. In fact, I can't think of any application where loose balls wouldn't be superior to balls in retainers. Often allows room for more balls, always allows more freedom of movement. That's a good thing.
simplify is offline  
Old 12-08-05, 02:10 PM
  #10  
Unique Vintage Steel
 
cuda2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 11,586

Bikes: Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Surly Straggler

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times in 56 Posts
I agree that loose balls feels better, but dang was it a nightmare attempting to put the top race of my threaded headset back on my schwinn with loose balls. I never did get it right and eventually took the bike in for a new headset (it was about time anyways) at the LBS. Every time I screwed the top race down on the fork, as soon as the greased bearings made contact with the race they would move down near the fork tube and get wedged under the race instead of riding on the proper line. I agree that it's better, but for headsets - I'll stick with retainers and keep my sanity.
cuda2k is offline  
Old 12-08-05, 02:14 PM
  #11  
Chronic Tai Shan
 
ofofhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PHL/BAL
Posts: 1,118

Bikes: Pake Single Speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cuda2k
I agree that loose balls feels better, but dang was it a nightmare attempting to put the top race of my threaded headset back on my schwinn with loose balls. I never did get it right and eventually took the bike in for a new headset (it was about time anyways) at the LBS. Every time I screwed the top race down on the fork, as soon as the greased bearings made contact with the race they would move down near the fork tube and get wedged under the race instead of riding on the proper line. I agree that it's better, but for headsets - I'll stick with retainers and keep my sanity.
Had you followed Sheldon's advice, you might not have had this problem... See post #5
ofofhy is offline  
Old 12-08-05, 02:18 PM
  #12  
Unique Vintage Steel
 
cuda2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 11,586

Bikes: Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Surly Straggler

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by ofofhy
Had you followed Sheldon's advice, you might not have had this problem... See post #5
Tried that and every other imaginable idea. Turned it upside down, right side up, and was pondering how to turn it inside out by the end of it.
cuda2k is offline  
Old 12-08-05, 03:39 PM
  #13  
Chronic Tai Shan
 
ofofhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PHL/BAL
Posts: 1,118

Bikes: Pake Single Speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cuda2k
Tried that and every other imaginable idea. Turned it upside down, right side up, and was pondering how to turn it inside out by the end of it.
I've never had that problem when the cups are loaded with a good amount of grease prior to placing the bearing balls in them. It acts like glue and keeps the balls from shifting, kind of like jockey shorts.
ofofhy is offline  
Old 12-08-05, 03:57 PM
  #14  
Gone, but not forgotten
 
Sheldon Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,301

Bikes: See: https://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ofofhy
I've never had that problem when the cups are loaded with a good amount of grease prior to placing the bearing balls in them. It acts like glue and keeps the balls from shifting, kind of like jockey shorts.
Actually, there are some headsets that are a real bear to install with loose balls, because the balls have to be at a particular radius, neither too far in nor too far out.

Generally, headsets are the one place where I like caged bearings. It's not like a smoother rolling headset will make you any faster, after all.

Then again, I once tried building up a Sturmey-Archer 3-speed hub with loose balls, that was a SERIOUS P.I.T.A....never again!

Sheldon "Retainers Have Their Place" Brown
Code:
+------------------------------------+
|   To YOU I'm an atheist; to God,   |
|   I'm the Loyal Opposition.        |
|                   --Woody Allen    |
+------------------------------------+
Sheldon Brown is offline  
Old 12-09-05, 11:15 AM
  #15  
ride, paint, ride
 
simplify's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,204

Bikes: Cannondale R300 Caad2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
It's not like a smoother rolling headset will make you any faster, after all.
Of course not, but a greater number of bearing balls will disperse the load onto more surface area, to take the pounding without as much probability of pitting the races, no?
simplify is offline  
Old 12-09-05, 11:49 AM
  #16  
Gone, but not forgotten
 
Sheldon Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,301

Bikes: See: https://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by lawkd
Of course not, but a greater number of bearing balls will disperse the load onto more surface area, to take the pounding without as much probability of pitting the races, no?
Possibly. Since the heavy load is on the lower half of the headset, it sometimes makes sense to use loose balls on the bottom, with a cage on top.

However, generally I wouldn't switch to loose balls except as a way to repair a damaged headset, unless I couldn't find a suitable retainer to fit.

See: https://sheldonbrown.com/brandt/indexed-steering.html

Sheldon "Headsets And Seatposts Are The Least Interesting Of Bicycle Parts To Me" Brown
Code:
+-------------------------------------------------------+
|  Le beau est aussi utile que l'utile  --Victor Hugo   |
|  (The beautiful is as useful as the useful)           |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
Sheldon Brown is offline  
Old 12-09-05, 12:00 PM
  #17  
hobby-ist
 
peterbarson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago, Suburbs
Posts: 357

Bikes: Schwinn WorldSport, Schwinn LeTour, Jamis Crosscountry, Litespeed Saber,

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by ofofhy
It will be one of the best things you can do for your headset. Use grade 25 bearing balls.
I think that since I have my bike hanging up for it's winters nap, I will take your advice, I was thinking of this anyway.
thanks
peterbarson is offline  
Old 12-09-05, 12:05 PM
  #18  
Klaatu barada nikto
 
cascade168's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
However, generally I wouldn't switch to loose balls except as a way to repair a damaged headset, unless I couldn't find a suitable retainer to fit.
I just recently overhauled a bike that I had not touched in years. The cheap headset had caged bearings and the steering had become noticeably indexed. I thought, for sure, that I'd be buying a new headset but figured I'd try loose balls first. Replacing the caged bearings with loose balls almost completely eliminated the indexing. While I would not say the steering is "silky" smooth, it's now very good and the lumpiness you get from indexing is gone. So, for my beater winter bike, I now have nice steering for the price of 50 5/32" loose balls. Presumably, if I had loose balls in the headset in the first place, I never would have had the indexing (brinelling) problem in the first place. So, I'm a believer.

FWIW, I had no problem installing the bearings and having them behave. I just put a nice bead of grease in the top cup and on the crown race and then placed the bearings in the grease - one at a time -
and then carefully reinstalled the fork. I found that by placing the bearings on the crown race instead of up_in_the_bottom_cup it saves you from doing anything upside down. I just use tweezers to pick them up and place them in the grease. It takes a little patience and a couple of minutes.

With a half a foot of snow falling already today, even loose balls are not going to help me with that
Time to wax the snowboard.

Last edited by cascade168; 12-09-05 at 12:16 PM.
cascade168 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.