Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

34 vs. 26 chain ring

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

34 vs. 26 chain ring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-05, 03:31 PM
  #1  
Gambe di sparviero
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
34 vs. 26 chain ring

Hi. I'm getting a compact double on my next bicycle, and I'm trying to decide between a 34t and a 36t chainring; cogs will probably be 12-23 or 12-26 (only difference there is that the 23 has a 17 in place of the 26).

I've crunched the numbers (thank you, Sheldon Brown: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/), so I know what ratios each chainring provides. What I don't know is what they're like in everyday use. The 36 seems like it would be more practical, especially in that the jump down/up from/to the big ring would be less dramatic. But, most everyone seems to offer 34t (36t is rare), so perhaps there's some meaning to that.

Any observations based on experience you can provide are welcome.

Thanks, and have a happy new year.

David
DaveloMA is offline  
Old 12-31-05, 03:50 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
It really depends on what your climbing needs are. For me I would choose the 36 because is would offer closer ratios with a 50 big ring and the smaller differential should mean better shifting performance and less chain rub on the side of the big ring. With a 34 there is a greater tendency for the chain to rub the inside of the big ring when the chain is running on the smaller cassette cogs.

Al
Al1943 is offline  
Old 12-31-05, 05:05 PM
  #3  
barnfullagts
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: WI
Posts: 623

Bikes: GT BI Ti/BI Steel - Edge Ti and Steel Xizang Ti and Psyclone Steel

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Tell us more where do you live and how many hills/climbs. If you go with the 23, there may be times when you'd enjoy having the 34 for a little broader range for climbing. Me'd takes the 34.
gm1230126 is offline  
Old 12-31-05, 05:46 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
rufvelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just go with the stock compact - 34/50. Your fitness is the bigger factor, 2 teeth +/- don't really do anything unless you care too much about a specific cadence and/or wish to output a specific wattage on climbs of a mile or longer. In other words, just ride...and enjoy.
rufvelo is offline  
Old 12-31-05, 09:33 PM
  #5  
Chainring tattoos rule...
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 108

Bikes: Gunnar RockHound, Gunnar Roadie

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rufvelo
Your fitness is the bigger factor...
Agree wholeheartedly. In my first complete year of riding (2005), I jumped up at least 2 gears or more on the longer / steeper climbs on my routes, and dramatically improved cadence as well.

However, I'm still avoiding any "real" mountain routes here in CO because I just don't think I'm geared low enough to avoid leaving my knees in little pieces along the shoulder.

Personally, I think a 36 would be low enough for 99% of the riding I would do here in CO, but I realilze that doesn't mean anything to anyone else in any other place. You've just got to get some miles in to determine what feels good and what you think you'll be capable of spinning in the long term. Good luck.
Huffer is offline  
Old 01-01-06, 02:29 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Deanster04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 1,383

Bikes: Cinelli Supercoursa 69, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Mondonico Diamond Extra 05, Coors Light Greg Lemond (built by Scapin) 88, Scapin MTB, Stumpjumper 83, Specialized Stumpjumper M4, Lemond Poprad 2001

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Depends on the mountains/hills in your area. You can go with either and your rear cassette can be selected for the killer hills. If you are truly in the mountains like here in Boulder and an old fart like me you will be wisest to go triple. I have both double (39/53) and triple (30/40/50) and my cassettes are 13/29. I select the bike for the ride I am programming for that day. See if you can try both and select the one that feels best. I've tried the compact and couldn't get used to the large jumps but thats just me. Good luck.
Deanster04 is offline  
Old 01-01-06, 11:01 AM
  #7  
Gambe di sparviero
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for all the input. I'm a 40-something returning rider, in good fitness, but not exceptionally strong. This coming season (starting today, when I mount the rollers) will be my first full season of riding in quite a while. I live in very hilly terrain in the Nashoba Valley area of Massachusetts. My current setup is a 53/42 with a 14-28 6-speed (yes, it's old).

With a standard double (53/39) and either a 12-26 and 12-27 cassette, I can match the lowest gear that I ride today, and that's adequate, but not optimal: Like I said, I'm not that strong, so I find myself somewhere between spinning and mashing on longer/steep climbs (not sure what cadence).

Luckily, with fesh new year's snow on the ground, I have more time to contemplate the perfect setup. (There is such a thing, right?

Happy new year, all.

David
DaveloMA is offline  
Old 01-01-06, 01:41 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Deanster04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 1,383

Bikes: Cinelli Supercoursa 69, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Mondonico Diamond Extra 05, Coors Light Greg Lemond (built by Scapin) 88, Scapin MTB, Stumpjumper 83, Specialized Stumpjumper M4, Lemond Poprad 2001

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I'm 63yrs, weigh 225lbs, and find a triple the best choice. I ride in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains and like to ride in the high mountains. I'm not fast, but can ride up almost anything with the triple including Mt Evans and Trail ridge road, both over 12K ft. Ride what feels right for you. Take the time (and $) to find a LBS that will check out your riding position and help optimize it for you. If you have a local Serotta dealer they seem to do the best job. After 50 years of riding I took the time and was able to make some subtle changes that made my riding more comfortable and less stressful on my poor old joints. Good riding in 06.
Deanster04 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.