Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    me have long head tube TallRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    4,088
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    10-speed chainrings less durable than 8-speed?

    Now, I know that a 10-speed chain will fit on chainrings originally designed for an 8-speed system, etc. And I suspect this means that the actual chainring teeth are no narrower with cranks designed for a 10-speed system, and so there's no reason the chainring teeth should be less durable than chainrings originally designed for 8-speed drivetrains. Can anyone confirm on this?
    The reason I'm asking is that I like to run a singe chainring on my commuting bike and may be building up a fixed-gear soon as well, and I want to know if there's any downside to picking up a chainring designed for a 10-speed system. Thanks.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    24,797
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For a fixed gear or single chainring crank, you will do better with the older design "flat" chainrings. Newer chainrings have pins and shaped teeth intended to enhance shifting speed. That's the last thing you want with a single chainring.

  3. #3
    me have long head tube TallRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    4,088
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider
    For a fixed gear or single chainring crank, you will do better with the older design "flat" chainrings. Newer chainrings have pins and shaped teeth intended to enhance shifting speed. That's the last thing you want with a single chainring.
    True of most newer chainrings, but not really true of the small chainrings from double cranks - those 42-tooth guys that don't need help to be shifted into, because there's no chainring smaller than them. These will sometimes have symmetrical teeth, even in 10-speed versions.

    And my question remains: are the teeth on 10-speed chainrings narrower (and therefore less durable, all other things being equal) than 8-speed chainrings?

  4. #4
    Senior Member Matt Gaunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,211
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not really, it's just the chains that suffer more because of their width. Sprockets and chainrings should have equal durability regardless of the number of cogs there are. The only real difference is the spacing between them and that won't affect durability I shouldn't think.
    Matt
    2010 Kinesis Decade Convert2 Alloy fixie, Miche, Sora Pics soon...
    2008 Kinesis RC2 Scandium/Carbon Road, Ultegra, Ksyrium Elites Pics
    2007 Kinesis Pha5e Scandium hardtail, XT, Revelations, Rockets, M4s, Mavics Pics
    2005 Kinesis RC Scandium/Carbon Road, Ultegra, Ksyrium SLs Pics
    1996 Raleigh Max Steel, Deore XT, SRAM Attack shifters, homemade wheels Pics

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •