Trimming Weight on Rims
#1
...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trimming Weight on Rims
I'm sitting here looking at my Deep-V rims and thinking blasphemous rational thoughts, again, without a whole lot of information. The rims are quite heavy. There are already some access holes in the rim for spoke installation. Why not carefully drill some more holes to trim off some weight? You could use one of those really strong rim strips like the plastic Michelin ones so that you wouldn't have a problems with blowing through. I'm sure it's been done. I'm also quire sure there are diminishing returns and increasing risks. Anybody ever do this?
I'm not saying I'm going to do it, I'm just wondering. There was another thread where the guy was thinking of trimming off the braking surface of his clinchers with vice-grips to make tubular rims and this post is sort of in that vein.
I'm not saying I'm going to do it, I'm just wondering. There was another thread where the guy was thinking of trimming off the braking surface of his clinchers with vice-grips to make tubular rims and this post is sort of in that vein.
#3
Videre non videri
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
So, let's think about this for a moment...
How much weight can you realistically save?
50 g per rim? Or for both...
Let's say you're an average, fit rider, weighing 70 kg. Your bike weighs, say, 7.5 kg. With a couple of water bottles, shoes, clothes and stuff, we'll make it an even 80 kg.
80 kg is 80 000 g.
If we say you saved 50 g, then you've reduced the total mass by a factor of...
50 / 80 000 = 0.9994
Yep, that's a whopping 0.06% you've saved!
Which would make you 0.06% faster if you were cycling vertically in vacuum.
At typical race speeds, on a mixed hilly/flat course over 100 miles, such a reduction would save you no more than about 10 seconds.
Worth it?
How much weight can you realistically save?
50 g per rim? Or for both...
Let's say you're an average, fit rider, weighing 70 kg. Your bike weighs, say, 7.5 kg. With a couple of water bottles, shoes, clothes and stuff, we'll make it an even 80 kg.
80 kg is 80 000 g.
If we say you saved 50 g, then you've reduced the total mass by a factor of...
50 / 80 000 = 0.9994
Yep, that's a whopping 0.06% you've saved!
Which would make you 0.06% faster if you were cycling vertically in vacuum.
At typical race speeds, on a mixed hilly/flat course over 100 miles, such a reduction would save you no more than about 10 seconds.
Worth it?
#4
Klaatu barada nikto
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by CdCf
Which would make you 0.06% faster if you were cycling vertically in vacuum.
Cheers,
Bill
#5
Long haired freak.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Still stuck in hell.
Posts: 6,281
Bikes: 2011 SE Old Man Flyer.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trials riders do this all the time... and they take a hellovalot more of a beating.
tartybikes.co.uk/products.php?product=rims_26
tartybikes.co.uk/products.php?product=rims_26
#6
LF for the accentdeprived
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 3,549
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm sorry, CdCf, that calculation is idiotic. Or lets just say, incorrect. First of all, 1kg on the bike != 1 kg on you. To take a trivial example, when you start from a red light and stand on the pedals, the heavier you are, the bigger weight is pushing down on the pedals (the more weight you have to get moving as well, of course). Now if that extra weight is on the bike, you will have to get more total mass moving, but not more power to get it moving with. A heavier bike is more difficult to bunnyhop and generally move around as well.
Now, as we all now (khm...) the outer perimeter of the wheels is where weight matters most, as you ave to spin them up every time you accelerate. Lighter wheels do matter.
To OP: I wouldn't do it. You sort of gave up on weight when you bought those silly heavy rims, and there's no going back. Sorry.
Now, as we all now (khm...) the outer perimeter of the wheels is where weight matters most, as you ave to spin them up every time you accelerate. Lighter wheels do matter.
To OP: I wouldn't do it. You sort of gave up on weight when you bought those silly heavy rims, and there's no going back. Sorry.
#7
Videre non videri
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I'm sorry, but you're wrong.
A commuter isn't (or shouldn't be if he/she is fairly sane) concerned with extreme weight savings. No normal race has more than one start from standing still. They're the only ones who would be stopping and starting regularly (traffic, red lights). And while it's true you accelerate and decelerate throughout a ride, the changes are very small. Besides, the extra mass on the rims isn't as big a deal as some claim. The more constant the speed is throughout the race, the less of a problem it is. At some point, you should actually benefit from it, because speed doesn't fluctuate as much if you have a larger rotating mass.
And you don't get extra power from pushing down with a greater body weight. You still have to do the work yourself, so being able to push down with a greater body mass, you also have to lift that mass up first. That means you have to do the same work, no matter what. This is only a factor when you start, and the first 3-4 seconds of the start aren't really important in a race over any reasonable distance.
So, in the end, the difference wouldn't be much greater than what I calculated. Even if I'm off by a factor of ten, it's still very little. And I know I'm not.
A commuter isn't (or shouldn't be if he/she is fairly sane) concerned with extreme weight savings. No normal race has more than one start from standing still. They're the only ones who would be stopping and starting regularly (traffic, red lights). And while it's true you accelerate and decelerate throughout a ride, the changes are very small. Besides, the extra mass on the rims isn't as big a deal as some claim. The more constant the speed is throughout the race, the less of a problem it is. At some point, you should actually benefit from it, because speed doesn't fluctuate as much if you have a larger rotating mass.
And you don't get extra power from pushing down with a greater body weight. You still have to do the work yourself, so being able to push down with a greater body mass, you also have to lift that mass up first. That means you have to do the same work, no matter what. This is only a factor when you start, and the first 3-4 seconds of the start aren't really important in a race over any reasonable distance.
So, in the end, the difference wouldn't be much greater than what I calculated. Even if I'm off by a factor of ten, it's still very little. And I know I'm not.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Think of how much water your wheel is going to collect every time that you ride in the rain.
#9
...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LóFarkas
Lighter wheels do matter.
To OP: I wouldn't do it. You sort of gave up on weight when you bought those silly heavy rims, and there's no going back. Sorry.
To OP: I wouldn't do it. You sort of gave up on weight when you bought those silly heavy rims, and there's no going back. Sorry.