Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Senior Member firebolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    SF Bayarea
    Posts
    166
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What's the advantage of Sybil link rear suspension design

    I am wondering what's the advantage, if any, of the rear-suspension setup that uses Sybil Link (e.g. SCruz superlite and GF Sugar) over all the other designs?

  2. #2
    NCAA - DUAL CHAMPIONS! a2psyklnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
    My Bikes
    Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
    Posts
    7,972
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    To begin with, the Santa Cruz Superlight is a single pivot bike. The pivot is placed at a height approx equal to the small chainring. This is an uncomplicated design, yield lighter weight, but the drawbacks are some pedal induced bobbing when in the small chainring. Overall the effect is minimal and careful pedaling can all but eliminate the bobbing. See here: http://www.santacruzmtb.com/bicycles...superlight.asp

    Secondly, the sugar utilizes carbon fiber seatstays for their design. This design elinates a set of pivots and the carbon flexes as part of the design.http://www.fisherbikes.com/bikes/ser...p?series=sugar

    The Sybil, suspension is an adjustable link added to change the travel to 4.1 inches.

    I'm not really sure what you're asking since you're comparing a single pivot to an adjustable multi-pivot bike.

    My guess, is you want to know what the link does. The only thing it does is add a little weight and increases the travel. This helps GF bikes compete with other lightweight XC full suspension bikes in the marketplace that achieve 4" of suspension travel. It's a good design and works well. I've ridden the Sugar 2+ that we have in the shop as a demo bike. Just not my cup of tea. I want a burly bike that can handle my 225 lb self w/o complaint!

    L8R
    "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
    "Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger

  3. #3
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,082
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by firebolt
    I am wondering what's the advantage, if any, of the rear-suspension setup that uses Sybil Link
    Well If you like bikes with multiple personalities that you'd need to send to a shrink...........

  4. #4
    Senior Member firebolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    SF Bayarea
    Posts
    166
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the info. To my untrained eyes, sugar and superlite have similar rear-suspension setup (and kinda funky looking), so I though I could put them in the same category. And to me, the other FS bikes have more "conventional-looking" setup (e.g. Trek Fuel, Rocky Mountain)

    I am new, and addicted to MTB and overwhelmed by the number of selections out there. I am currently using a Fisher hardtail (love it to bit), and thinking about adding a full suspension to my collection in a year or two.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •