Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Senior Member Dinstee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Memphis, TN USA
    Posts
    331
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Computer/wheel question

    I have just gotten a Trek Incite 8I computer (wireless) and have a question regarding setting up the wheel size. The computer, as do just about all computers, has several preset wheel size configurations to choose from including a custom setting. I have a 26" 1.6 semi slick on my MTB but the closest preset is 26 1.5. The next size is 1.9. Is the difference between 1.5 & 1.6 too small for me to worry about or should look at using the custom wheel size setting? For now I am using the 1.5 setting.
    Yeah, I've been on your wheel for a good long time. I'll be more than happy to pull us all if you'd just slow down a bit. ;)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    24,766
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A custom setting of 201 cm or 2010 mm (or 79.2" if the calibration numbers are in inches) should be about right is the tire is close to the stated size.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Dinstee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Memphis, TN USA
    Posts
    331
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thanks. I see that 2010 mm is corresponding to the 26x 1.5- so i'm going to just leave it alone. (Or put my 26x1.9 back on)
    Last edited by Dinstee; 05-02-06 at 09:27 AM.
    Yeah, I've been on your wheel for a good long time. I'll be more than happy to pull us all if you'd just slow down a bit. ;)

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cheshire (home), Loughborough (uni). [UK]
    My Bikes
    04 Hardrock Pro Disk
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get a tapemeasure, prerfably a fabric one, and mesure around the circuforence of the actaul wheel in question.
    - Or put the valve at the bottom of the wheel, mark the ground, roll it round and back to the valve at the bottom, mark the ground again. Then mesure that distance!

    Also, random fact of the day.
    - If you see the circufrence to 1667mm and set the computer to display Kh/h it will count tens of revs (Ie, 32.5Km/h = 325rpm)


    Daniel

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 510, Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dhutch
    Get a tapemeasure, prerfably a fabric one, and mesure around the circuforence of the actaul wheel in question.

    Daniel
    That will give you a number too large because it does not account for the loaded weight.

    Al

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    24,766
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "Rollout" measured with the correct tire pressure and your weight on the bike is, theoretically, the most accurate way to determine the true wheel circumference but it has to be done properly or it's no better than the calculated value. You will be right within a fraction of 1% if you use the calculated value.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 510, Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider
    "Rollout" measured with the correct tire pressure and your weight on the bike is, theoretically, the most accurate way to determine the true wheel circumference but it has to be done properly or it's no better than the calculated value. You will be right within a fraction of 1% if you use the calculated value.
    The discrepancy is more if the sensor works off of the rear wheel, less if off of the front wheel. I tend to forget that because I've always run rear wheel pickup computers.

  8. #8
    In beaurocratic limbo urbanknight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez, K2 Razorback
    Posts
    22,459
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought most computer instructions also included a method for measuring it yourself. Something like marking off 20' and measuring the distance for one full wheel rotation. It's supposed to be more accurate too, since tires can vary (especially mtb tires).

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 510, Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by urbanknight
    I thought most computer instructions also included a method for measuring it yourself. Something like marking off 20' and measuring the distance for one full wheel rotation. It's supposed to be more accurate too, since tires can vary (especially mtb tires).
    You can mark of several rotations on the floor and take the average but this needs to be done with the tires fully inflated and the bike with the full weight of the rider and gear.

    Al

  10. #10
    In beaurocratic limbo urbanknight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez, K2 Razorback
    Posts
    22,459
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Al1943
    You can mark of several rotations on the floor and take the average but this needs to be done with the tires fully inflated and the bike with the full weight of the rider and gear.

    Al
    Sorry, forgot to mention that. I would do this with someone holding me, riding the bike backwards. Just like the rollout for junior gear restrictions.

  11. #11
    Last one to the top... Little Darwin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Wilkes-Barre, PA
    My Bikes
    Many
    Posts
    6,785
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If your computer measures in millimeters:

    If you want to be relatively accurate and still impress people with how far you ride, or your speed as recorded on your computer, pick one size larger than your tire and/or round up to the next increment of 10.

    If you want to be relatively accurate and still make sure that you don't say 100 miles unless you are absolutely sure you rode at least 100 miles, pick one size smaller than your tire and/or round down to the next increment of 10.

    Either way, the two numbers (high and low) are likely to be within 2%... A difference between 2000 and 2020 millimeter circumference is 1%.

    If the difference between 30.0 mph and 30.3 mph is critical to you, then you should do a roll-out test... otherwise, an estimate based on closest match in the computer's ducumentation should be fine for most people.
    Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA

    People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
    - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •