Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 79
  1. #1
    we are 138 Philatio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    676
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What is the advantage of a threadless headset vs a threaded?

    Just curious, I figure there has gotta be one. Thanks

  2. #2
    Senior Curmudgeon
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Directly above the center of the earth
    My Bikes
    Electra Townie 1-speed with basket & fenders
    Posts
    3,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Absolutely none at all. Both threaded and threadless do the job just fine. Threadless forks are less expensive to manufacture. IMHO that is why threadless has become standard.

  3. #3
    Svr
    Svr is offline
    Senior Member Svr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,223
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Threadless advantages - lighter, easier to maintain. Disadvantages - stem height adjustment range depends on steerer length, although there are adapters to overcome this.

  4. #4
    sch
    sch is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Birmingham. AL
    Posts
    2,586
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They are transplants from the ATB world, which nearly took over biking in the pre triathlon/pre Lance era.
    In the early '90s ATB were outselling roadbikes 9:1. Manufactureres discovered that slant top tube bikes
    were easier to stock as 3-4 sizes cover the market, where parallel top tube frames needed 6-8 sizes to cover the market. The threadless fork is one size fits all frames, just chop the head tube to size and use a few spacers to fit it to the bike, whereas threaded forks must be very close to the right length and shortening one risks buggering the threads hence are made to fit the frame So now you know why slant top tube frames are taking over the road bike world: so shops and frame makers can get by with smaller numbers of frame sizes and simplify their stocking.

    Of course it helps that riders buy a lot of them as well. I will eventually get used to their look, but still
    prefer the classic DF, parallel top tube bike. Slant top tube makes me think of gnus.
    Steve
    Last edited by sch; 05-23-06 at 11:03 AM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member barba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,086
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have both. I think that the threadless system is a bit lighter and maybe a bit stiffer. Changing out the length of the stem can be a bit easier with threadless, and I like the ability to flip the stem to get the bars lower as my fitness improves over a season.

    All that said, I like the look of a quill better.

  6. #6
    biked well well biked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,712
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree that the "innovation" of threadless was more an issue of manufacturers looking to be more efficient as far as the manufacturing process. I also agree that it was the mtb market that drove it, particularly with the suspension fork. And the fact that it became clear that aftermarket suspension forks would create more aftermarket fork business than had been present before. Makes more manufacturing sense to build forks with a long steerer tube that can be cut to size instead of making a whole bunch of different threaded lengths. And it is a very strong design (threadless fork/stem), so it does have merit as far as mtb's are concerned. Once the threadless thing caught on, it became obvious to the road bike sector it was the way to go, too, in terms of manufacturing efficiency. Just my .02

  7. #7
    My bikes became Vintage OLDYELLR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,090
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Still owning a bike I bought 25 years ago, I'm afraid threadless headsets are totally foreign to me, as is most of the stuff that's spilled over from the SUV, I mean MTB, world. How are these things adjusted with the same degree of precision you would adjust a threaded headset? Do they use ball bearings or tapered rollers?
    1981 Nishiki Ultimate
    1977 Nishiki Landau
    1967 Jeunet Captivante track bike
    1951 Claud Butler New Allrounder under construction
    "index shifters = frets on a fiddle"

  8. #8
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OLDYELLR
    How are these things adjusted with the same degree of precision you would adjust a threaded headset?
    One nice thing is these things do not require much precision to preload the bearings.....an allen wrench is all that's required.....no more huge headset wrenches..........especially on those very rare occassion where your headset loosens up while on the road...
    Last edited by roadfix; 05-22-06 at 07:36 PM.
    .cinelli.olympic.surly.long.haul.trucker.kona.ku.surly.steamroller.
    .litespeed.classic.litespeed.firenze.bianchi.pista.dean.colonel.plus.more.

  9. #9
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,496
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Philatio
    Just curious, I figure there has gotta be one. Thanks
    Typically you can save about 1/4-lb by removing the quill and bolt that goes down into the steerer tube when going from threaded to threadless. Also clamping on the outside of the steerer gives you a larger diameter interface with more contact surface-area, leading to a stiffer joint with less flex. Try flexing the bars by standing facing the bike with your legs straddling the front-tyre. Grab both bar-ends and yank one up and push the other down. With a traditional 100mm Cinelli-type quill-stem, you'll be able to flex the bar-ends 2" up and down. With the stiffer threadless design, this flex will be about 1/2 of that or just 1".
    Last edited by DannoXYZ; 05-23-06 at 03:29 PM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member bernmart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Roubaix Pro
    Posts
    806
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I own one of each--that is, a newer bike with a threadless stem, and an older bike with a quill stem. Adjusting the quill couldn't be easier, and it looks great, IMHO. The trouble with threadless is that most are cut so low that riders are forced into a more radical position than makes sense for them. So it's not so much the technology, though I see little real advantage to the rider in it, as the range of adjustment that manufacturers provide when they cut the steerer.
    Specialized Roubaix Pro
    Specialized Sequoia Elite

  11. #11
    Senior Member Cactus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    My Bikes
    Normal Ones
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Some silliness in some posts above.

    Threadless headsets allow cost reductions in bicycle manufacturing. One fork (cut to length by the LBS) works for all frame sizes, and never needs to go through a threading operation.

    Quill stems are easier to set up and adjust to the rider. They also allow the handlebar to be higher (yes there are cludges to make threadless stems higher).

    Headset/stem weight is a red herring. You really have to consider how much difference it will make in your ride. Generally, the honest answer is none.

    As to twisting a handlebar so that either end shifts 2", well that's just not goinjg to happen unless something is broken. And, that might be the rider. There is no way, standing in front of a bike, that anyone can stablize the steerer tube enough to tell of motion is caused by the stem bending, or the more likely culprits of the whole bike moving, or worst case, the front wheel being soft and bending.

    There is so much silliness of stiffness that is just so much marketing brainwashing.

    So, either headset type and stem works just fine.

  12. #12
    bike rider jimmythefly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    My Bikes
    83 Trek 500, 2x 90s Novara Randonee, Zion 737, Specialized Rockhopper, Nishiki Colorado, Univega Specialissima
    Posts
    282
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Threadless, as someone has mentioned, are much easier to adjust in the field as they do not require two largeish wrenches. I just put an adapter on my bike, so that I still have the threaded headset, but now use a threadless-type stem. It is noticeabley stiffer (same bar, fork, wheels, etc).

    I haven't quantified it scientifically, but you know how when you walk in sand or snow you feel like you're losing some energy to slippage? That's the kind of difference I noticed, like I had been walking in sand and now with the stiffer stem I am on firm ground and when I stand up to hammer up a short hill more of my energy is being used to move me forward.

  13. #13
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,496
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cactus
    As to twisting a handlebar so that either end shifts 2", well that's just not goinjg to happen unless something is broken. And, that might be the rider. There is no way, standing in front of a bike, that anyone can stablize the steerer tube enough to tell of motion is caused by the stem bending, or the more likely culprits of the whole bike moving, or worst case, the front wheel being soft and bending.
    Just because you've never experienced something, does not mean it doesn't happen. Because I've never gotten into a wreck in a Volvo, I'm not going to make any comments one way or the other about their relative safety in relation to Mercedes or BMW.

    You can hook your toes around two spokes at the bottom of the rim, squeeze your knees on both sides of the wheel to keep the front-end stable and yank one bar-end up and push the other down. This is just with my arm strength, imagine an all-out sprint with the muscles from the legs and back being brought into this scenario:



    The fact is, there's such a thing known as engineering, using terms like modulus-of-elasticity and equations that depict the polar moment-of-inertia (radial stiffness) of tubing. For any given design and material, you can calculate the amount of deflection based upon the loads (or just pull out a ruler and measure the distance from each bar-end to the fork-crown in those photos). There's a reason bikes aren't made from 3/4" diameter tubing and why softer materials like titanium or aluminium are made in larger diameters than steel.

    In the 10-years I've worked at a shop, I must've seen over 50 snapped stems, all of them quill stems, never a threadless. Although I have seen a few threadless stems with stripped-out clamp bolts. I've snapped two quill-stems in finishing sprints at races and an SR handlebar too. Refer to Kirichenko's 1989 World Championship event... and you'll know why track guys use steel handlebars and stems...

    There's a difference between facts and rationalization. It doesn't matter WHY something is designed or WHY it's used, you can come up with an infinite numbers of reasons on both sides. Here are just the general facts, regardless of "why":

    QUILL STEMS
    - heavier
    - more flexible
    - easier to twist in fork
    - easier to adjust for height
    - one-piece wrapping clamp tends to be quieter, although tougher to change bars
    - looks cooler when horizontal without too much of a handlebar-drop

    THREADLESS STEMS
    - lighter
    - stiffer
    - harder to twist on fork (due to larger clamping area)
    - tough to adjust for height without future planning during installatoin
    - might not look as cool when adjusted for comfortable handlebar-drop
    - easier to change bars, but 4-bolt clamp can squeak
    - pretty much the only way to install a stem on an aluminium or CF steerer tube

    There are pros and cons to both, you just have to pick a list of criteria that's important to you and find the system that best fits those criteria.

    Quote Originally Posted by OLDYELLR
    How are these things adjusted with the same degree of precision you would adjust a threaded headset? Do they use ball bearings or tapered rollers?
    Yes, you can adjust them with the same amount of precision as threaded headsets. They also come in both ball-bearing and roller-bearing versions. I like the roller-bearings since they can withstand more load and lasts longer. Notice that on my bike above, I have the roller-bearing Stronglight threaded headset (62gm) and I've left enough extra steerer tube to use with a threadless stem if I wanted to...
    Last edited by DannoXYZ; 05-23-06 at 05:24 AM.

  14. #14
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
    QUILL STEMS
    - heavier
    - more flexible
    - easier to twist in fork
    - easier to adjust for height
    - one-piece wrapping clamp tends to be quieter, although tougher to change bars
    - looks cooler when horizontal without too much of a handlebar-drop

    THREADLESS STEMS
    - lighter
    - stiffer
    - harder to twist on fork (due to larger clamping area)
    - tough to adjust for height without future planning during installatoin
    - might not look as cool when adjusted for comfortable handlebar-drop
    - easier to change bars, but 4-bolt clamp can squeak
    - pretty much the only way to install a stem on an aluminium or CF steerer tube

    There are pros and cons to both, you just have to pick a list of criteria that's important to you and find the system that best fits those criteria.
    That is the best summary I've heard to date anywhere. Good job.

    Tim
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  15. #15
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,298
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    And here i'll quote the most important attribute that makes threaded superior to threadless:

    - looks cooler when horizontal without too much of a handlebar-drop

    Threadless is just ugly as hell.
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For tourists, the issue of weight saving in the tool departmant are the biggest difference. You can adjust and service threadless systems using standard carry-along allen keys.

  17. #17
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,298
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Uh what.
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  18. #18
    Last one to the top... Little Darwin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Wilkes-Barre, PA
    My Bikes
    Many
    Posts
    6,798
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelW
    For tourists, the issue of weight saving in the tool departmant are the biggest difference. You can adjust and service threadless systems using standard carry-along allen keys.
    Just pulled the last one in the thread, but really asking about a point I saw mentioned several times.

    I have never had a threaded headset that needed adjustment... is it actually a weakness of threadless that they require occasional adjustment?

    The only time I have ever adjusted a threaded headset is when I was repacking the bearings.
    Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA

    People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
    - Ralph Waldo Emerson

  19. #19
    me have long head tube TallRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    4,088
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Danno, great run-down.
    -
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelW
    For tourists, the issue of weight saving in the tool departmant are the biggest difference. You can adjust and service threadless systems using standard carry-along allen keys.
    This is actually a good point. I've got a 32mm combo headset/pedal wrench from Park that weighs very little (about twice the thickness of a cone wrench), but it's still an extra thing to carry b/c threaded headset.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    24,782
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dgregory57
    I have never had a threaded headset that needed adjustment... is it actually a weakness of threadless that they require occasional adjustment?

    The only time I have ever adjusted a threaded headset is when I was repacking the bearings.
    Unfortunately, I have. I have an S&S coupled travel bike that the headset loosened on while I was on a business trip and I didn't have a headset wrench. I wound up borrowing a 32 mm open end wrench from the plant where I was working to readjust it.

    Since then I have always carried the Park travel headset/pedal wrench Tim describes above. It is a neat tool and very light. But, yes you are correct that this is a very rare problem.

    However, if the stem is properly installed and tightened, threadless headsets very rarely need adjustment until they are disassembled intentionally so neither type is at a disadvantage here.

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    My Bikes
    Specialized Sirrus Sport, Specialized Stumpjumper Comp, Brompton, Trek 1500
    Posts
    379
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dgregory57
    Just pulled the last one in the thread, but really asking about a point I saw mentioned several times.

    I have never had a threaded headset that needed adjustment... is it actually a weakness of threadless that they require occasional adjustment?

    The only time I have ever adjusted a threaded headset is when I was repacking the bearings.
    What about turning the handlebars when you are travelling how do you do this.

  22. #22
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,496
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by motorhommmer
    What about turning the handlebars when you are travelling how do you do this.
    Take the front-wheel off and turn the bars & fork 90-degrees?

  23. #23
    Last one to the top... Little Darwin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Wilkes-Barre, PA
    My Bikes
    Many
    Posts
    6,798
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider
    Unfortunately, I have. I have an S&S coupled travel bike that the headset loosened on while I was on a business trip and I didn't have a headset wrench. I wound up borrowing a 32 mm open end wrench from the plant where I was working to readjust it.

    Since then I have always carried the Park travel headset/pedal wrench Tim describes above. It is a neat tool and very light. But, yes you are correct that this is a very rare problem.

    However, if the stem is properly installed and tightened, threadless headsets very rarely need adjustment until they are disassembled intentionally so neither type is at a disadvantage here.
    Good points. Just because it hasn't happened to me doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. But since I have never owned a threadless, I was curious.

    Now I have another tool to buy and make sure that I have with me, just in case.

    Thanks!
    Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA

    People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
    - Ralph Waldo Emerson

  24. #24
    Senior Curmudgeon
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Directly above the center of the earth
    My Bikes
    Electra Townie 1-speed with basket & fenders
    Posts
    3,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
    ...There are pros and cons to both, you just have to pick a list of criteria that's important to you and find the system that best fits those criteria...
    Best summary I've seen, too, DannoXYZ! Thanks!

  25. #25
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by operator
    And here i'll quote the most important attribute that makes threaded superior to threadless:

    - looks cooler when horizontal without too much of a handlebar-drop

    Threadless is just ugly as hell.

    Not exactly scientific, but true. Nothing beats a really nice quill stem for sheer beauty.


    Tim
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •