Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-12-06, 04:10 PM   #1
Pe4er
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Pe4er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London, UK
Bikes:
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
26" wheels on a 700c frame?

Hello People. Is there any reason why 26" mtb wheels shouldn't be used on a 700c frame? Having bought a 700c hybrid frame (135mm spacing) with disc brake only mounts I'm finding it difficult to find cheap 700c disc hub wheels. I calculate that the difference in the height of the bike will only change by about 2cm. I'll be fitting reasonably chuncky tyres for city communting. Cheers, Pete.
Pe4er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-06, 04:28 PM   #2
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Rans Rockst (Retro rocket) Rans Enduro Sport (Retro racket) Catrike 559, Merin Bear Valley (beater bike).
Posts: 26,744
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)
So how far above ground level is your pedal at it's lowest point? I'm thinking that you might find yourself adding the cost of a 26" wheelset onto the price of whatever other wheels you eventually decide to buy.
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-06, 04:28 PM   #3
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Bikes: Some silver ones, a black one, a red one, an orange one and a couple of titanium ones
Posts: 18,064
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pe4er
Hello People. Is there any reason why 26" mtb wheels shouldn't be used on a 700c frame? Having bought a 700c hybrid frame (135mm spacing) with disc brake only mounts I'm finding it difficult to find cheap 700c disc hub wheels. I calculate that the difference in the height of the bike will only change by about 2cm. I'll be fitting reasonably chuncky tyres for city communting. Cheers, Pete.
You may want to recalculate. Neglecting tires, the rim of a 26" mountain bike wheel has a diameter 559mm while a 700C wheel has a 622 mm diameter. That's a difference of 63mm or 6.3 cm (2.4"). That means that your bottom bracket is 2.4" closer to the pavement. Pedal strike could become a problem unless you are very careful going around corners. If the bike has a low bottom bracket to begin with, it could be even more problematic. 2.4" lower could also affect handling negatively. You could try it or you could just build the proper wheels. Wheel building isn't that difficult and it gives you a sense of accomplishment.
__________________
Stuart Black
New! Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
New! Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
An Good Ol' Fashion Appalachian Butt Whoopin'.
cyccommute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-06, 04:35 PM   #4
Pe4er
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Pe4er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London, UK
Bikes:
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Shows how much I know!

I though that 700c referred to a 700mm diameter. Perhaps it's time to give wheelbuilding a try. Thanks for your responses. Pete
Pe4er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-06, 05:04 PM   #5
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Posts: 9,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pe4er
I though that 700c referred to a 700mm diameter.
It does, but it's a generality.
Al1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-06, 05:06 PM   #6
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Posts: 9,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al1943
It does, but it's a generality.
And includes the tire. (I can't get my edit function to work.)
Al1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-06, 05:12 PM   #7
wroomwroomoops
Sir Fallalot
 
wroomwroomoops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Bikes:
Posts: 5,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pe4er
I though that 700c referred to a 700mm diameter. Perhaps it's time to give wheelbuilding a try. Thanks for your responses. Pete
If you really thought that, your calculation must have been even more off, that is, you must have noticed an even greater difference in wheel sizes, and therefore, an even stronger case for making a wheel instead of putting a 26" on a 700c frame.

I am a bit confused by your train of thoughts.
wroomwroomoops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-06, 05:13 PM   #8
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Posts: 9,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyccommute
You may want to recalculate. Neglecting tires, the rim of a 26" mountain bike wheel has a diameter 559mm while a 700C wheel has a 622 mm diameter. That's a difference of 63mm or 6.3 cm (2.4"). That means that your bottom bracket is 2.4" closer to the pavement. Pedal strike could become a problem unless you are very careful going around corners. If the bike has a low bottom bracket to begin with, it could be even more problematic. 2.4" lower could also affect handling negatively. You could try it or you could just build the proper wheels. Wheel building isn't that difficult and it gives you a sense of accomplishment.
Your math is a bit off. The wheel difference is approximately (700 - 650)/2 = 25mm, about one inch. The axle height is a function of the difference in 1/2 of the diameter or the radius. This can also be divided by 2 a second time because the rear wheel is not changing, only the front. So a good estimate of the drop in the bottom bracket and pedals would be about 1/2 inch.

I would be more concerned with what happens with the change in steering trail.

Al
Al1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-06, 06:05 PM   #9
well biked 
biked well
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,088
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
700c/disc wheelsets are becoming more popular because of the increasing popularity of 29" mountain bikes, so you might keep shopping around. But you said "cheap wheels" so that might be the catch for you.........I don't know how fat a tire you're currently running on the hybrid, or how fat you could go as to the clearances on the frame and fork, but if you're currently running, say, a 32c tire and you could go to something like a 26" x 1.75", you'd offset some of the ground clearance issue. As for that: 622mm (diameter of 700c rim) minus 559mm (diameter of 26" rim) equals 63mm. Divide difference by two for the difference in radius, which is the applicable measurement for the difference in ground clearance: 31.5mm, or 3.15 cm, which is what, about an inch and a half?

edit: I looked it up, 3.15cm equals 1.24 inches.

Last edited by well biked; 07-12-06 at 07:29 PM.
well biked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-06, 07:44 PM   #10
wb 86
beam and bikes
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Blacksburg VA
Bikes:
Posts: 87
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Shop around for some reasonably priced disc mtb hubs and 700c wheels and build them up, or have an LBS do it. A buddy/wrench at my LBS has a Karate Monkey set up w/ mechanical discs and 2 sets of disc wheels. One gets a set of 2.3" WTB 29er mtb tires while the set used for commuting to campus/work has a set of 700/25 Contis on them. Both sets are disc only and he laced them up on the cheap. Less than a machine built pre assembled pair from the catalog even after his shop discount.
wb 86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-06, 12:45 PM   #11
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Bikes: Some silver ones, a black one, a red one, an orange one and a couple of titanium ones
Posts: 18,064
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al1943
Your math is a bit off. The wheel difference is approximately (700 - 650)/2 = 25mm, about one inch. The axle height is a function of the difference in 1/2 of the diameter or the radius. This can also be divided by 2 a second time because the rear wheel is not changing, only the front. So a good estimate of the drop in the bottom bracket and pedals would be about 1/2 inch.

I would be more concerned with what happens with the change in steering trail.

Al
D'oh! But I did say that I was neglecting tires because tire height is rather variable. Pe4er is looking at both wheels so the front and rear would change and the 'rim' difference would still be 1.2" which can be a lot in terms of lowering a bottom bracket...depending on the terrain being ridden and the geometry of the bike, of course.

650C wheels, by the way, have a diameter of 571mm, he says, muddying the waters even more.
__________________
Stuart Black
New! Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
New! Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
An Good Ol' Fashion Appalachian Butt Whoopin'.
cyccommute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-06, 02:42 PM   #12
Gonzo Bob
cycles per second
 
Gonzo Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: Vitus Aluminum, DiamondBack Apex, Softride Powerwing 700, "Generic" Ishiwata 022, Trek OCLV 110
Posts: 1,790
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
2cm is OK. My MTB is nearly 2cm lower when I swap from 26x2.1 to 26x1.4 -- (2.1-1.4)*2.54 = 1.8cm. As long as the frame has enough clearance for the tires, I say go for it.
Gonzo Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-06, 02:54 PM   #13
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Posts: 9,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by well biked
700c/disc wheelsets are becoming more popular because of the increasing popularity of 29" mountain bikes, so you might keep shopping around. But you said "cheap wheels" so that might be the catch for you.........I don't know how fat a tire you're currently running on the hybrid, or how fat you could go as to the clearances on the frame and fork, but if you're currently running, say, a 32c tire and you could go to something like a 26" x 1.75", you'd offset some of the ground clearance issue. As for that: 622mm (diameter of 700c rim) minus 559mm (diameter of 26" rim) equals 63mm. Divide difference by two for the difference in radius, which is the applicable measurement for the difference in ground clearance: 31.5mm, or 3.15 cm, which is what, about an inch and a half?

edit: I looked it up, 3.15cm equals 1.24 inches.
Ok, but the OP is lowering only the front half of the bike, so the bottom bracket and pedals will be lowered only about 1/2 of the 1.24 inches, or about 0.63 inches which is the number is asking for. A larger tire on the front would help compensate for the drop, but only a small amount.

Al
Al1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-06, 03:02 PM   #14
well biked 
biked well
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,088
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al1943
Ok, but the OP is lowering only the front half of the bike, so the bottom bracket and pedals will be lowered only about 1/2 of the 1.24 inches, or about 0.63 inches which is the number is asking for. A larger tire on the front would help compensate for the drop, but only a small amount.

Al
I had the impression he was looking for a wheelset, not just the rear wheel.
well biked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-06, 06:41 PM   #15
cerewa
put our Heads Together
 
cerewa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: southeast pennsylvania
Bikes: a mountain bike with a cargo box on the back and aero bars on the front. an old well-worn dahon folding bike
Posts: 3,155
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
I had the impression he was looking for a wheelset, not just the rear wheel.
I had that impression too.

Which, by the way, means that there should be essentially no difference in handling. If you drastically change the height of the front relative to the rear, you'll change the handling of the bike, but otherwise handling will be basically the same (aside from changes due to different tire/wheel weights.)
cerewa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-06, 08:18 AM   #16
Ziemas
Senior Member
 
Ziemas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riga, Latvia
Bikes:
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Here are some inexpensive disc wheels from a German online site. I've ordered many times from this company and am quite happy with them. Their prices are excelent and they have very good Englsih speaking customer service.

http://www.bike-components.de/catalo...da481ee0948c8e
Ziemas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-06, 01:51 PM   #17
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Posts: 9,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by well biked
I had the impression he was looking for a wheelset, not just the rear wheel.
Ok, sorry, I got two different threads mixed up.
Al1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-08, 04:00 PM   #18
wroomwroomoops
Sir Fallalot
 
wroomwroomoops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Bikes:
Posts: 5,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thank goodness for this thread! It (+ a little research and a lot of measuring) just answered a question I had. I'll be doing something similar to the OP, at least temporarily.I'll be using a Surly Instigator fork, which has a crown higher than most 700C forks, so I might not even have my frame lower than it was originally supposed to - or at least, it will be just a little bit lower, a few mm at most.

Excellent thread!
wroomwroomoops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-09, 01:28 PM   #19
NormanF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 5,370
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
You could go with Fat Franks or Big Apples. Otherwise, I wouldn't bother. Half the fun of a 26" bike conversion is rolling along on balloon tires, which can be as fast as a skinny one and more comfortable.
NormanF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-09, 01:38 PM   #20
CCrew
Older than dirt
 
CCrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winchester, VA
Bikes: Too darn many.. latest count is 11
Posts: 5,343
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Buy a cheap set of 29er wheels. They're just 700c's (622mm). I priced out a set of Bontrager Super Sport disc wheels (was researching a CL price) and the set was $225. (front was $99) I'm sure there are other wheels out there at that price point or lower..

-Roger
CCrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-09, 02:05 PM   #21
Hawaiiwrench
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oahu, HI
Bikes: '94 DB Apex, '07 SBC Allez Elite
Posts: 126
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A 26x2.1 installed has almost the same o.d. as a 700x23, Mavic Speedcitys are often used like this...
A hybrid should handle at least 700x 35, but frame clearance may still be an issue with something really wide.
Hawaiiwrench is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-09, 02:55 PM   #22
LarDasse74
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Posts: 3,769
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cerewa View Post
...If you drastically change the height of the front relative to the rear, you'll change the handling of the bike, but otherwise handling will be basically the same (aside from changes due to different tire/wheel weights.)
This is not true. Handling changes most drastically due to a change in the 'trail' of the bike. Generally speaking, more 'trail' makes a bike more stable and difficult to turn. Less 'trail' makes a bike less stable and easier to turn.

"Trail" is basically the distance from the intersection point of the ground and an imaginary line drawn down the centre of the head-tube, and the point where the front tire touches the ground. The dimansions that affect trail are head angle, fork rake, and wheel diamter. If you change the wheel diameter you change the handling.
LarDasse74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-09, 03:04 PM   #23
adaminlc
Senior Member
 
adaminlc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Bikes: 2007 Surly Cross Check, 199? Novara Alpine
Posts: 328
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CCrew View Post
Buy a cheap set of 29er wheels. They're just 700c's (622mm). I priced out a set of Bontrager Super Sport disc wheels (was researching a CL price) and the set was $225. (front was $99) I'm sure there are other wheels out there at that price point or lower..

-Roger
+1 I'm building up a set of 29'r wheels for my cross check (no disk brake) so as to a more mtb like experience. There is 29'r stuff for anything you could want.
adaminlc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-09, 06:49 PM   #24
jccaclimber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Terre Haute, Lafayette, or Indianapolis, IN, depending on the day
Bikes: n, I would like n+1
Posts: 1,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The common conversion if you just want wider tires (assuming they will even fit in your frame/fork/brakes) is 650B. It provides wide tires. You will however need long reach brakes.
jccaclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:29 AM.