Threadless Stem Adaptor
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Threadless Stem Adaptor
I would like to upgrade my bike to a threadless fork. However, I now see there is a "threadless stem adaptor" setup. Question: Is it safe? Alignment problems? It sure is cheaper than getting a new threadless fork. Would appreciate any qualified opinions. Thanks in advance.
#2
Ferrous wheel
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,388
Bikes: 2004 Gunnar Rock Hound MTB; 1988 Gitane Team Pro road bike; 1986-ish Raleigh USA Grand Prix; mid-'80s Univega Gran Tourismo with Xtracycle Free Radical
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Threadless adaptors have been around for quite some time. I put one on a customer bike once, and it is fine. It is not prone to alignment problems any more than a threadless stem on a threadless fork would be. It is going to add some weight, I suspect, in comparision to a threadless fork setup.
If it were my bike, I would question the wisdom of the "upgrade" unless something is wrong with your current fork. Threadless forks certainly make an older bike look worse, in my opinion, and unless you are swapping stems and bars frequently, I wonder what the advantages would be.
If it were my bike, I would question the wisdom of the "upgrade" unless something is wrong with your current fork. Threadless forks certainly make an older bike look worse, in my opinion, and unless you are swapping stems and bars frequently, I wonder what the advantages would be.
#3
is slower than you
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: WI
Posts: 1,486
Bikes: Gunnar Sport, Marin Pine Mountain, Gunnar Ruffian, Gunnar Roadie, BMC Fourstroke, Salsa Vaya
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I used an adaptor on my previous road bike. It worked flawlessly. The only drawback was weight, but the bike was no feather, so it didn't matter much.
#4
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Threadless Stem Adaptor
Thank you for your reply and advice. I have a 1997 Merlin Extralight The threaded Time fork and stem look quite nice actually, but as a typical biking nut, I like to keep up with the latest. I may just try out one of these adaptors just to see what it looks like.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 142
Bikes: several!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I use an adaptor because I needed a different bar and stem for hand numbness issues, and its too hard to find the right quill stem these days. If your riding position is fine, I would not bother with the upgrade. It won't save any weight.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Quahog, RI
Posts: 1,509
Bikes: Giant TCR Comps, Cdale R5000, Klein Q-Pro, Litespeed Siena, Piasano 105, Redline Conquest Pro, Voodoo Bizango, Fuji Aloha
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I used one on an older tri bike because I wanted to go with a longer stem. They can be had from many online retailers for under $20. Never had a problem with them. Once it's in, everything (except for headset adjustment) works just like a threadless.