Maybe I just don't understand what integrated headsets are...
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Maybe I just don't understand what integrated headsets are...
My new bike was shipped to my place yesterday. I'll have to install the headset so I was going through it to make sure everything was there and to check it out since I've never seen an integrated headset outside of the frame.
I was surprised to see that (at least this model) had races much like any other headset I've seen. The only difference is that the entire cup fit entirely inside of the head tube (please correct me if I'm using the wrong terminology). Then the sealed bearings rest on/in these.
I had always thought that with integrated headsets, the races were actually a part of the frame. So what the hell am I missing?
Side question: I noticed there was a small amount of paint on the inside of the headtube. Is this going to cause a problem for when I install the cups? Should I have it reamed?
Thanks.
I was surprised to see that (at least this model) had races much like any other headset I've seen. The only difference is that the entire cup fit entirely inside of the head tube (please correct me if I'm using the wrong terminology). Then the sealed bearings rest on/in these.
I had always thought that with integrated headsets, the races were actually a part of the frame. So what the hell am I missing?
Side question: I noticed there was a small amount of paint on the inside of the headtube. Is this going to cause a problem for when I install the cups? Should I have it reamed?
Thanks.
#2
Life is short Ride hard
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Posts: 1,114
Bikes: not enough
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
sounds like you have a semi-integrated headset. Integrated headsets can damage frames
#3
Life is short Ride hard
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Posts: 1,114
Bikes: not enough
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,735
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
1 Post
Parktool has a section on headsets that should give you an idea of what parts make up a headset. Hopefully, with some figurin' on your part you'll understand how it all works.
Paint on the steerer tube is not an issue. The surface of the steerer should NEVER touch the head tube. Thats what the headset does. It keeps the forks firmly attached and freely rotating on one axis. It is the only structural contact between your forks and your frame.
Paint on the steerer tube is not an issue. The surface of the steerer should NEVER touch the head tube. Thats what the headset does. It keeps the forks firmly attached and freely rotating on one axis. It is the only structural contact between your forks and your frame.
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Thanks for the links. Yes, it's a semi-integrated headset.
The paint is on the inside of the headtube, exactly where the cups will be pressed in.
Originally Posted by masiman
Paint on the steerer tube is not an issue. The surface of the steerer should NEVER touch the head tube. Thats what the headset does. It keeps the forks firmly attached and freely rotating on one axis. It is the only structural contact between your forks and your frame.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,735
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
1 Post
I have not installed alot of headsets so I would have to defer to someone else's more experienced opinion. Even more so I have not worked with integrated headsets.
My guess would be that if it is overspray it would be fine. If the paint has some thickness, it may need to be sanded some.
My guess would be that if it is overspray it would be fine. If the paint has some thickness, it may need to be sanded some.
#7
Team Beer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 6,339
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times
in
104 Posts
That park page on headsets rocks. I had no idea there were that many types of headsets.
__________________
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,735
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Cynikal
That park page on headsets rocks. I had no idea there were that many types of headsets.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I believe the type of headset you are describing is formally called a "Zero-Stack". The frame has the ends of the headtube flaired to accept press in cups (sort of like conventional headset cups but without the short cylindrical stubs) that then hold the bearing cartridges.
True integrated headsets have the bearing seats machined directly into the headtube ends.
True integrated headsets have the bearing seats machined directly into the headtube ends.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,735
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
1 Post
Hijack -- but a good discussion.
HillRider,
Did these come out of the low profile craze? I remember reading about them, but like biopace, I did not want to adopt early, . My impression of the early write ups is that they went through alot of complexities to fix a minor problem. And apparently from the King website, they did not do a whole lot. Anyone still specing these on frames? I just have not noticed them. If so, what types of bikes and reasons for using them?
HillRider,
Did these come out of the low profile craze? I remember reading about them, but like biopace, I did not want to adopt early, . My impression of the early write ups is that they went through alot of complexities to fix a minor problem. And apparently from the King website, they did not do a whole lot. Anyone still specing these on frames? I just have not noticed them. If so, what types of bikes and reasons for using them?
#11
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
They seem to be found on a fair number of triathlon / TT bikes....Felt, QR, Cervelo, Kuota to name a few. I think that aerodynamics of the head tube region is one reason for them--smooths out that region to not have cups 'protruding.' Another reason I think is that it allows for a "shorter" headtube area (which of course relates to frame geometry and fit....but I won't even try to speculate on HOW ).
Originally Posted by masiman
Hijack -- but a good discussion.
HillRider,
Did these come out of the low profile craze? I remember reading about them, but like biopace, I did not want to adopt early, . My impression of the early write ups is that they went through alot of complexities to fix a minor problem. And apparently from the King website, they did not do a whole lot. Anyone still specing these on frames? I just have not noticed them. If so, what types of bikes and reasons for using them?
HillRider,
Did these come out of the low profile craze? I remember reading about them, but like biopace, I did not want to adopt early, . My impression of the early write ups is that they went through alot of complexities to fix a minor problem. And apparently from the King website, they did not do a whole lot. Anyone still specing these on frames? I just have not noticed them. If so, what types of bikes and reasons for using them?
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I was always convinced that integrated/zero stack headsets were a Marketing and cosmetic gimmick that had no functional value over conventional headsets. They weren't inherently flawed but didn't bring anything uuseful to the party either and many of the early installations had real problems.
The fad seems to be fading as some makers (Litespeed for one) have abandoned them and gone back to the older type. They aren't gone completely but they don't appear to taking over the world either.
Chris King's web site has a pretty strong condemnation of them but considering he never made either type and didn't want to tool up his motives are suspect. King did finally introduce a proprietary form of integrated headset that doesn't fit any standard frame but I don't think he sold more than a handful.
I managed to wait them out and my new Litespeed had a standard press in headset.
The fad seems to be fading as some makers (Litespeed for one) have abandoned them and gone back to the older type. They aren't gone completely but they don't appear to taking over the world either.
Chris King's web site has a pretty strong condemnation of them but considering he never made either type and didn't want to tool up his motives are suspect. King did finally introduce a proprietary form of integrated headset that doesn't fit any standard frame but I don't think he sold more than a handful.
I managed to wait them out and my new Litespeed had a standard press in headset.
#13
la vache fantôme
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 6,266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't really understand the reasoning for these integrated headsets either. I have not had any problem with my integrated headset for my homegrown, but I did not like pressing those bearings right into the frame. I also used a Zero stack for a while, I liked that more. Still, I don't understand why not just use the regular type. It's just one more machining operation to get the bore in the head tube. You really rely on the manufacturer boring these accurately, or else you will have problem. Then you squeeze the outer race of the radial bearing in and what a not so smooth setup you may have...