Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Senior Member billallbritten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Murray, KY
    My Bikes
    Trek 7500 FX (2005)
    Posts
    780
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    KMC 10sp chain seems to be lasting longer than expected, am I checking it wrong?

    12" steel rule, link pin center to pin center is still dead on after 2,000 miles (can't believe I've put more miles on the bike than the car since July). I've measured with the chain tight with the help of a second person and loose, laid along the straight edge and get the same thing, no discernable wear re: 12" measurement. My Shimano chains on my 9sp Trek are usually measurably elongated by this time.

    I did switch to Prolink ProGold with the KMC on the Veloce from the dry lubes I'd used on the Trek so that's a new variable. On-bike cleaning with a chain cleaner every 600, 700 miles (3 times since purchase).

    Just a bit surprised, pleasantly.

    Bill
    His: Trek 7500FX
    Bianchi Veloce
    Spouse: Trek 7.5FX
    Daughter's: GT Slipstream (nice steel campus bike, step through frame)

  2. #2
    me have long head tube TallRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've never been confident with ruler-measuring compared to a chain checker device (which you can get for $5). But it sounds as if your'e doing it right, with the chain pulled tight.

    I think ProLink is a "dry" lube, btw.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    9,209
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not sure why you are surprised, I've got 4100 miles on my 10-speed Campy chain with no measureable extension. One of my riding buds has about the same.

    Al

  4. #4
    Senior Member billallbritten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Murray, KY
    My Bikes
    Trek 7500 FX (2005)
    Posts
    780
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by timcupery
    I've never been confident with ruler-measuring compared to a chain checker device (which you can get for $5). But it sounds as if your'e doing it right, with the chain pulled tight.

    I think ProLink is a "dry" lube, btw.
    Pedro's wax was what I had been using and was thinking of as a dry lube. I've got one of the Park checkers with the swinging arm - never seems to give consistent readings on any chain,new or used.
    His: Trek 7500FX
    Bianchi Veloce
    Spouse: Trek 7.5FX
    Daughter's: GT Slipstream (nice steel campus bike, step through frame)

  5. #5
    me have long head tube TallRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Gotcha about dry lube and chain checker. I've got the one-piece chain checker, like this Park model. No if, and or but with this.

    Anyway, on your maintenance schedule, no need to be surprised that your chain is lasting well.

  6. #6
    Has opinion, will express
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    13,032
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by billallbritten
    Pedro's wax was what I had been using and was thinking of as a dry lube. I've got one of the Park checkers with the swinging arm - never seems to give consistent readings on any chain,new or used.
    Yep, I had someone with one of those measure the chain on one of my bikes and tell me it was worn out. The chain had only about 500km on it. The Park tool can only measure what really is a very tiny variation, whereas at least the ruler will measure it across 12-times that variation. Of course, the ruler has to be accurately marked in the first place, but if the same one is used for all measurements, then no real problem.

    I'd say the OP's maintenance and lube routines are working fine.
    Dream. Dare. Do.

  7. #7
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by timcupery
    I've never been confident with ruler-measuring compared to a chain checker device (which you can get for $5). But it sounds as if your'e doing it right, with the chain pulled tight.

    I think ProLink is a "dry" lube, btw.
    So it's a $5 ruler.

    ...
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    26,180
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Actually ruler measurement is far more accurate than most of the "chain checker" tools, Park's or any one elses.

  9. #9
    weirdo
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    My Bikes
    Viner Pro Carbon,Fat Chance Yo-Eddie, Specialized S-Works (epic), Voodoo Rada, Trek 830 setup SS for commuting.
    Posts
    97
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    And with the chain checkers, you need to be very careful not to bend the pins. i.e. don't just throw it in your tool box.

  10. #10
    Senior Member billallbritten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Murray, KY
    My Bikes
    Trek 7500 FX (2005)
    Posts
    780
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the replies, I'm comfortable that I'm not missing something. I'm "old school" in my shifting, too, always backing off a bit before moving the lever. That seems to prevent some of the double-cogging and clattering that I've noticed when some riders shift.
    His: Trek 7500FX
    Bianchi Veloce
    Spouse: Trek 7.5FX
    Daughter's: GT Slipstream (nice steel campus bike, step through frame)

  11. #11
    Life is short Ride hard
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    In the middle of nowhere
    My Bikes
    not enough
    Posts
    1,114
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Digital calipers would that be more exacting?
    The Ferrari ('05 Bianchi Forza) had a flat (Stupid Glass) the Japanese wagon ('77 Nishiki with Arkel Utility Basket) was in the body shop (On my bench being repainted...repent ye rust)
    so I took the SUV ( Cannondale V2000 Active 100SL)

  12. #12
    ride, paint, ride simplify's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    My Bikes
    Cannondale R300 Caad2
    Posts
    1,202
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider
    Actually ruler measurement is far more accurate than most of the "chain checker" tools, Park's or any one elses.
    The one exception is when the rollers are what's wearing out, and not the pins and plates. I thought my chain was showing no wear at 2000 miles, because according to the ruler, it was spot on at 12 inches. However, the rollers were wearing such that they allowed significantly more space between the rollers. That does not impact the length of the chain, because the length is determined by the pins connecting the plates and the pseudo-bushings of the plates. The rollers can wear independently of those, and the ruler won't show you that.
    No car. No TV. Three bikes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •