Biopace chainrings / ritchey logic cranks
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Biopace chainrings / ritchey logic cranks
Hello all,
I'm building up a new crankset, and I have a set of Ritchey Logic Sugino cranks. I have some biopace chainrings which I'd like to put on them. Here's the problem. The crankset that I removed the rings from did not have an integrated 5th arm spider. My Ritchey's do, so the pin on the chain ring which sticks out is no longer behind the crank arm, I can only get it above or below. Does this matter? I assume that it does...
TIA,
Richard
I'm building up a new crankset, and I have a set of Ritchey Logic Sugino cranks. I have some biopace chainrings which I'd like to put on them. Here's the problem. The crankset that I removed the rings from did not have an integrated 5th arm spider. My Ritchey's do, so the pin on the chain ring which sticks out is no longer behind the crank arm, I can only get it above or below. Does this matter? I assume that it does...
TIA,
Richard
#2
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
To the best of my knowledge, that only matters in that it keeps the chain from getting stuch between the crank and the bottom bracket should it come off the chainring. So as long as your derailleurs are adjusted properly, you should be fine.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Besides preventing the chain from wedging between the chainring and the crank arm, the pin also indicates the correct "phase" of the Biopace rings. So if you can't install it in the preferred orientation, you will compromise the enormous benefit Biopace was supposed to have.
#4
ride, paint, ride
^^^right, although there are many people who turn them deliberately to get a different effect.
The other solution is to pull out that pin from the chainring. I did this when I used my Biopace on a crankarm that had an integral pin of its own. The pin on the chainring comes right out with a pair of pliers and little effort--wobble it back and forth, and be sure the chainring is kept flat so you don't accidentally bend the chainring. Then you can install the chainring in the intended orientation, instead of having to turn it.
The other solution is to pull out that pin from the chainring. I did this when I used my Biopace on a crankarm that had an integral pin of its own. The pin on the chainring comes right out with a pair of pliers and little effort--wobble it back and forth, and be sure the chainring is kept flat so you don't accidentally bend the chainring. Then you can install the chainring in the intended orientation, instead of having to turn it.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Originally Posted by lawkd
^^^right, although there are many people who turn them deliberately to get a different effect.
Then you can install the chainring in the intended orientation, instead of having to turn it.
Then you can install the chainring in the intended orientation, instead of having to turn it.
The old crank had all 5 arms oriented around the crank arm so no chainring retaining bolt actually went into the crank arm.
#6
Gone, but not forgotten
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,301
Bikes: See: https://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by int19
Hello all,
I'm building up a new crankset, and I have a set of Ritchey Logic Sugino cranks. I have some biopace chainrings which I'd like to put on them. Here's the problem. The crankset that I removed the rings from did not have an integrated 5th arm spider. My Ritchey's do, so the pin on the chain ring which sticks out is no longer behind the crank arm, I can only get it above or below. Does this matter? I assume that it does...
I'm building up a new crankset, and I have a set of Ritchey Logic Sugino cranks. I have some biopace chainrings which I'd like to put on them. Here's the problem. The crankset that I removed the rings from did not have an integrated 5th arm spider. My Ritchey's do, so the pin on the chain ring which sticks out is no longer behind the crank arm, I can only get it above or below. Does this matter? I assume that it does...
Sheldon "The Last Biopace Fan" Brown
Code:
+------------------------------------------------------+ | When a thing ceases to be a subject of controversy, | | it ceases to be a subject of interest. | | - William Hazlitt | +------------------------------------------------------+
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
Normally, the pin and the index marks on Biopace chainrings are supposed to go behind the arm. For cranks like yours, however, you can't do that, so the rings should be installed 180 degrees from the normal orientation, so that the index marks are _opposite_ the right arm.
I would recommend pulling the pin out. I've had this issue with using Campy Record chainrings (designed for Record crank with integrated 5th spider-arm) on non-Record cranksets. However, since these cranks aren't ovalized, it doesn't matter so much what orientation. But it still does matter since ramps and pins in the chainrings are designed to aid shifting at specific points along the the pedaling stroke, so even in that case I've mounted the chainrings with the pin opposite the crankarm.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#8
Si Senior
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Naperville, Illinois
Posts: 2,669
Bikes: Too Numerous (not)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
8 Posts
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
Normally, the pin and the index marks on Biopace chainrings are supposed to go behind the arm. For cranks like yours, however, you can't do that, so the rings should be installed 180 degrees from the normal orientation, so that the index marks are _opposite_ the right arm.
Sheldon "The Last Biopace Fan" Brown
Sheldon "The Last Biopace Fan" Brown
Code:
+------------------------------------------------------+ | When a thing ceases to be a subject of controversy, | | it ceases to be a subject of interest. | | - William Hazlitt | +------------------------------------------------------+
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Originally Posted by dbg
Sounds like a good idea... So if I may hijack the thread breifly... I'm considering trying out biopace on a recumbent and it seems like the relationship of the leg power output and the chainring are about 90 degrees away from that of an upright bike. Do you think it makes sense to shift the biopace oval back by 90 degrees?
If you rotated them 90 degrees (actually 72 degrees, presuming a 5-arm spider which is the only sort of crank for which biopace rings were ever manufactured) you'd be doing the opposite of what Biopace was intended for, and you'd be maximizing pressure on your knees during the power phase of the pedal stroke.
#10
Si Senior
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Naperville, Illinois
Posts: 2,669
Bikes: Too Numerous (not)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
8 Posts
So I'm thinking I actually want to shift them forward by 90 degrees so that the interaction with the oval on the chain is in the same place during my power stroke as it would be on an upright.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Originally Posted by dbg
So I'm thinking I actually want to shift them forward by 90 degrees so that the interaction with the oval on the chain is in the same place during my power stroke as it would be on an upright.
Secondly, the point of biopace is not to have the largest chainring diameter at the power phase of the stroke - it's the opposite. (There are ovalized chainrings, including those used by Bobby Julich in time trialing, that are ovalized with the wider section in line with the power phase. But these have historically been hard on people's knees. See Sheldon's article on Biopace for more info here.)
#12
Gone, but not forgotten
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,301
Bikes: See: https://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by dbg
Sounds like a good idea... So if I may hijack the thread breifly... I'm considering trying out biopace on a recumbent and it seems like the relationship of the leg power output and the chainring are about 90 degrees away from that of an upright bike. Do you think it makes sense to shift the biopace oval back by 90 degrees?
Sheldon "That's How It Is On My Greenspeed" Brown
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi Sheldon,
Thanks a bunch, I was thinking the 180 degrees; same thing late last night and will mount them that way when I get home. I can't wait to try them out and see what they are like!
Richard
Thanks a bunch, I was thinking the 180 degrees; same thing late last night and will mount them that way when I get home. I can't wait to try them out and see what they are like!
Richard
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
Normally, the pin and the index marks on Biopace chainrings are supposed to go behind the arm. For cranks like yours, however, you can't do that, so the rings should be installed 180 degrees from the normal orientation, so that the index marks are _opposite_ the right arm.
Sheldon "The Last Biopace Fan" Brown
Sheldon "The Last Biopace Fan" Brown
Code:
+------------------------------------------------------+ | When a thing ceases to be a subject of controversy, | | it ceases to be a subject of interest. | | - William Hazlitt | +------------------------------------------------------+