Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-24-06, 12:02 AM   #1
int19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Biopace chainrings / ritchey logic cranks

Hello all,

I'm building up a new crankset, and I have a set of Ritchey Logic Sugino cranks. I have some biopace chainrings which I'd like to put on them. Here's the problem. The crankset that I removed the rings from did not have an integrated 5th arm spider. My Ritchey's do, so the pin on the chain ring which sticks out is no longer behind the crank arm, I can only get it above or below. Does this matter? I assume that it does...

TIA,
Richard
int19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 12:04 AM   #2
urbanknight
In beaurocratic limbo
 
urbanknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Bikes: Specialized Allez, K2 Razorback
Posts: 22,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
To the best of my knowledge, that only matters in that it keeps the chain from getting stuch between the crank and the bottom bracket should it come off the chainring. So as long as your derailleurs are adjusted properly, you should be fine.
urbanknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 03:41 AM   #3
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,917
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Besides preventing the chain from wedging between the chainring and the crank arm, the pin also indicates the correct "phase" of the Biopace rings. So if you can't install it in the preferred orientation, you will compromise the enormous benefit Biopace was supposed to have.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 06:51 AM   #4
simplify
ride, paint, ride
 
simplify's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego
Bikes: Cannondale R300 Caad2
Posts: 1,204
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
^^^right, although there are many people who turn them deliberately to get a different effect.

The other solution is to pull out that pin from the chainring. I did this when I used my Biopace on a crankarm that had an integral pin of its own. The pin on the chainring comes right out with a pair of pliers and little effort--wobble it back and forth, and be sure the chainring is kept flat so you don't accidentally bend the chainring. Then you can install the chainring in the intended orientation, instead of having to turn it.
simplify is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 08:58 AM   #5
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,917
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawkd
^^^right, although there are many people who turn them deliberately to get a different effect.

Then you can install the chainring in the intended orientation, instead of having to turn it.
If I interpret the problem, the pin isn't an obstruction. The problem is the new crank has the crank arm as the "5th-arm" of the spider like Campy does with some of their cranks. One chainring retaining bolt threads into the crank arm.

The old crank had all 5 arms oriented around the crank arm so no chainring retaining bolt actually went into the crank arm.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 09:11 AM   #6
Sheldon Brown
Gone, but not forgotten
 
Sheldon Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Bikes: See: http://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Posts: 2,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by int19
Hello all,

I'm building up a new crankset, and I have a set of Ritchey Logic Sugino cranks. I have some biopace chainrings which I'd like to put on them. Here's the problem. The crankset that I removed the rings from did not have an integrated 5th arm spider. My Ritchey's do, so the pin on the chain ring which sticks out is no longer behind the crank arm, I can only get it above or below. Does this matter? I assume that it does...
Normally, the pin and the index marks on Biopace chainrings are supposed to go behind the arm. For cranks like yours, however, you can't do that, so the rings should be installed 180 degrees from the normal orientation, so that the index marks are _opposite_ the right arm.

Sheldon "The Last Biopace Fan" Brown
Code:
+------------------------------------------------------+
|  When a thing ceases to be a subject of controversy, |
|  it ceases to be a subject of interest.              |
|                                   - William Hazlitt  |
+------------------------------------------------------+
Sheldon Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 09:55 AM   #7
TallRider
me have long head tube
 
TallRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
Normally, the pin and the index marks on Biopace chainrings are supposed to go behind the arm. For cranks like yours, however, you can't do that, so the rings should be installed 180 degrees from the normal orientation, so that the index marks are _opposite_ the right arm.
Yup, just what I was thinking. Biopace rings were designed to be in specific ovalized orientation with respect to the crankarms, and if you installed it with the pin just to the left or right of the crankarm, that orientation would be 36 degrees off what it's supposed to be. However, by flipping the ring around (so the pin is exactly opposite the crankarm) the ovalization is lined up as it's supposed to be because Biopace rings are symmetrical.

I would recommend pulling the pin out. I've had this issue with using Campy Record chainrings (designed for Record crank with integrated 5th spider-arm) on non-Record cranksets. However, since these cranks aren't ovalized, it doesn't matter so much what orientation. But it still does matter since ramps and pins in the chainrings are designed to aid shifting at specific points along the the pedaling stroke, so even in that case I've mounted the chainrings with the pin opposite the crankarm.
TallRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 10:05 AM   #8
dbg
Si Senior
 
dbg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Naperville, Illinois
Bikes: Too Numerous (not)
Posts: 2,612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
Normally, the pin and the index marks on Biopace chainrings are supposed to go behind the arm. For cranks like yours, however, you can't do that, so the rings should be installed 180 degrees from the normal orientation, so that the index marks are _opposite_ the right arm.

Sheldon "The Last Biopace Fan" Brown
Code:
+------------------------------------------------------+
|  When a thing ceases to be a subject of controversy, |
|  it ceases to be a subject of interest.              |
|                                   - William Hazlitt  |
+------------------------------------------------------+
Sounds like a good idea... So if I may hijack the thread breifly... I'm considering trying out biopace on a recumbent and it seems like the relationship of the leg power output and the chainring are about 90 degrees away from that of an upright bike. Do you think it makes sense to shift the biopace oval back by 90 degrees?
dbg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 10:09 AM   #9
TallRider
me have long head tube
 
TallRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbg
Sounds like a good idea... So if I may hijack the thread breifly... I'm considering trying out biopace on a recumbent and it seems like the relationship of the leg power output and the chainring are about 90 degrees away from that of an upright bike. Do you think it makes sense to shift the biopace oval back by 90 degrees?
No, because your legs will be pushing from a 90-degree diff angle than on a regular bike, but at the point when your legs are pushing the most, the cranks are also rotated 90 degrees from what they are on a regular bike. So it cancels out.
If you rotated them 90 degrees (actually 72 degrees, presuming a 5-arm spider which is the only sort of crank for which biopace rings were ever manufactured) you'd be doing the opposite of what Biopace was intended for, and you'd be maximizing pressure on your knees during the power phase of the pedal stroke.
TallRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 10:31 AM   #10
dbg
Si Senior
 
dbg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Naperville, Illinois
Bikes: Too Numerous (not)
Posts: 2,612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
So I'm thinking I actually want to shift them forward by 90 degrees so that the interaction with the oval on the chain is in the same place during my power stroke as it would be on an upright.
dbg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 11:02 AM   #11
TallRider
me have long head tube
 
TallRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbg
So I'm thinking I actually want to shift them forward by 90 degrees so that the interaction with the oval on the chain is in the same place during my power stroke as it would be on an upright.
Well, first you can't shift them 90 degrees - you could only do that if you had a 4-bolt spider on your crank and chainrings. With a 5-bolt spider, you have to work with 72 degree increments.

Secondly, the point of biopace is not to have the largest chainring diameter at the power phase of the stroke - it's the opposite. (There are ovalized chainrings, including those used by Bobby Julich in time trialing, that are ovalized with the wider section in line with the power phase. But these have historically been hard on people's knees. See Sheldon's article on Biopace for more info here.)
TallRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 11:30 AM   #12
Sheldon Brown
Gone, but not forgotten
 
Sheldon Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Bikes: See: http://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Posts: 2,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbg
Sounds like a good idea... So if I may hijack the thread breifly... I'm considering trying out biopace on a recumbent and it seems like the relationship of the leg power output and the chainring are about 90 degrees away from that of an upright bike. Do you think it makes sense to shift the biopace oval back by 90 degrees?
No, it isn't as much as 90 degrees. For recumbent use, you want to move the chainring forward by one bolt, i.e. 72 degrees.

Sheldon "That's How It Is On My Greenspeed" Brown
Sheldon Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-06, 11:49 AM   #13
int19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi Sheldon,

Thanks a bunch, I was thinking the 180 degrees; same thing late last night and will mount them that way when I get home. I can't wait to try them out and see what they are like!

Richard

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
Normally, the pin and the index marks on Biopace chainrings are supposed to go behind the arm. For cranks like yours, however, you can't do that, so the rings should be installed 180 degrees from the normal orientation, so that the index marks are _opposite_ the right arm.

Sheldon "The Last Biopace Fan" Brown
Code:
+------------------------------------------------------+
|  When a thing ceases to be a subject of controversy, |
|  it ceases to be a subject of interest.              |
|                                   - William Hazlitt  |
+------------------------------------------------------+
int19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:33 PM.