Measuring a chain for chain stretch
#1
weirdo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 98
Bikes: Viner Pro Carbon,Fat Chance Yo-Eddie, Specialized S-Works (epic), Voodoo Rada, Trek 830 setup SS for commuting.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Measuring a chain for chain stretch
OK, I'll admit it, I am a chain checker guy, but I am trying to remember the formula for measuring the chain with a ruler to tell if it is worn out. How many links to measure, and what value is good, and when it should be replaced. Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
The normal recommendation is to accurately measure the distance between 24 pins (technically 12 full links) which should be exactly 12.0" for a new chain. If the distance has increased to 12-1/16" (0.5% elongation) the chain is marginal and should be replaced if you are planning to use the same cassette/freewheel with the new chain. If the chain measures 12-1/8" (1% "stretch) replace the cassette/freewheel along with it.
#3
weirdo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 98
Bikes: Viner Pro Carbon,Fat Chance Yo-Eddie, Specialized S-Works (epic), Voodoo Rada, Trek 830 setup SS for commuting.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks, That was what I was looking for.
#5
as seen on crimewatch
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 211
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
check different sections of the chain too. chains don't strecth uniformly, they tend to stretch in just one area of the change.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In a cardboard box by Alki beach.
Posts: 343
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have one of those chain checkers and I don't like it.
As Hillrider says, if the chain is 0.5% elongated, it should be changed if you want to use the same chainrings and cassette with the new chain. The Nashbar and Park chain checkers won't register less than .75% elongation, at which point you could very well need to replace the cassette and chainrings also.
I just changed a chain that had not worn enough to register on the Park chain checker, but it was worn enough that the other parts needed changing.
As Hillrider says, if the chain is 0.5% elongated, it should be changed if you want to use the same chainrings and cassette with the new chain. The Nashbar and Park chain checkers won't register less than .75% elongation, at which point you could very well need to replace the cassette and chainrings also.
I just changed a chain that had not worn enough to register on the Park chain checker, but it was worn enough that the other parts needed changing.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Originally Posted by Old_Fart
I just changed a chain that had not worn enough to register on the Park chain checker, but it was worn enough that the other parts needed changing.
My recommendation is that a good ruler is cheaper and more accurate than any of the chain checker tools.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,082
Bikes: Trek, Cannondale Tandem, Surly LHT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
RoadBikeRider's (a weekly e-magazine) technical guru had an article on "chain checkers" today. His conclusion was that the Park version isn't sensitive enough to give good numbers until way too late.
My recommendation is that a good ruler is cheaper and more accurate than any of the chain checker tools.
My recommendation is that a good ruler is cheaper and more accurate than any of the chain checker tools.
#9
ride, paint, ride
Originally Posted by HillRider
RoadBikeRider's (a weekly e-magazine) technical guru had an article on "chain checkers" today. His conclusion was that the Park version isn't sensitive enough to give good numbers until way too late.
My recommendation is that a good ruler is cheaper and more accurate than any of the chain checker tools.
My recommendation is that a good ruler is cheaper and more accurate than any of the chain checker tools.
#10
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Old Hammer Boy
+1. Get a good 12" quality metal ruler and use it often. It's easy, and one of the few times a non-metric tool is appropriate for a modern bicycle.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,007
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I often have a spare, unused chain handy which I use to check wear on a used chain. Hang both chains on a nail and pull them tight. You can easily see 3/16" wear over 3' of chain.