Wheelbuilding question in 2 parts
11-18-06, 04:21 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wheelbuilding question in 2 parts
I've decided to give wheelbuilding a go.....i figure by the time i retire i will have mastered it and it'll give me something to do in my old age (i have about 35yrs to do that).
So first question is.......is building your own wheels cheaper? or is it more a personal satisfaction of doing the job yourself.
Second.....Tension meters. my LBS stocks a range....from an $800 DT digital to the Park TM-1. I'm looking at the park because its cheapest. Any reason to go with something else? The guy at the shop while helpful uses the high end one.....but as he said "its a business expense"........so i suspect the top of the line model would be overkill for me.
Any other tips from experienced wheelbuilders are always welcome. thanks in advance guys
So first question is.......is building your own wheels cheaper? or is it more a personal satisfaction of doing the job yourself.
Second.....Tension meters. my LBS stocks a range....from an $800 DT digital to the Park TM-1. I'm looking at the park because its cheapest. Any reason to go with something else? The guy at the shop while helpful uses the high end one.....but as he said "its a business expense"........so i suspect the top of the line model would be overkill for me.
Any other tips from experienced wheelbuilders are always welcome. thanks in advance guys
11-18-06, 05:58 AM
#2
Boomer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,214
Bikes: Diamondback Clarity II frame homebuilt.
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16098 Post(s)
Liked 1,457 Times
in
1,064 Posts
Is it cheaper than a machine built wheel? No. (This would be a comparison between apples and oranges) Is it cheaper than a professionally hand built wheel? Maybe or maybe not because of the bulk prices that they pay for material.
Is there a degree of satisfaction froming doing the job yourself? Absolutely.
There is no need to buy the high end tension meter for a low volumn builder.
The money saved here could be used to buy a book or 2 on the art of wheelbuilding.
You will be able to build wheels for special purposes that are not available on the market. (Clydsdales for example can benefit from custom handbuilt wheels).
Is there a degree of satisfaction froming doing the job yourself? Absolutely.
There is no need to buy the high end tension meter for a low volumn builder.
The money saved here could be used to buy a book or 2 on the art of wheelbuilding.
You will be able to build wheels for special purposes that are not available on the market. (Clydsdales for example can benefit from custom handbuilt wheels).
11-18-06, 06:53 AM
#3
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
Personal satisfaction and the ability to use my choice of parts...try a 1972 S-A dynohub on a 1978 Fiamme Redlabel
Also for whatever reason the LBSes in this area don't want to build up a wheel using old parts.
The Park tension meter works fine, the main thing is to use one.
For an online wheel building course go to the one and only Sheldon Brown I have printed off his directions and refer to them on a regular basis. I had build a couple of wheels before but apparently was doing it the hard way
Aaron
Also for whatever reason the LBSes in this area don't want to build up a wheel using old parts. The Park tension meter works fine, the main thing is to use one.
For an online wheel building course go to the one and only Sheldon Brown I have printed off his directions and refer to them on a regular basis. I had build a couple of wheels before but apparently was doing it the hard way
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
11-18-06, 08:34 AM
#4
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
Building them costs more than machine built wheels, but you get to choose the specs of your wheels, and the satisfaction of a job well done, like you said.
The Park tension meter should be fine. They make great tools. I have built many wheels and have never used a tension meter, though. I use pitch, which seems to have built many strong wheels for me. The only exception is when I used really thin spokes, and didn't realize the tension would seem different. Just don't try to do some super duper lightweight spoke, it's not worth the risk... says my shoulder.
The Park tension meter should be fine. They make great tools. I have built many wheels and have never used a tension meter, though. I use pitch, which seems to have built many strong wheels for me. The only exception is when I used really thin spokes, and didn't realize the tension would seem different. Just don't try to do some super duper lightweight spoke, it's not worth the risk... says my shoulder.
