Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

New crank help

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

New crank help

Old 12-10-06, 04:24 PM
  #1  
Duathlete
Thread Starter
 
indygreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
New crank help

All,
I am new to road biking. I have a new bike - it was a very good deal . . . but I want to make a change. It is full DA, including crank. It is too much crank for me - I want to go with a compact.
This post is not seeking advice on if I should do this or not. It is not seeking any advice telling me that compacts are fads, not needed, or that anyone should be able to ride a full size double. I respect all that information but do not care.

I am looking at compacts. I plan on buying one and selling my DA to recoup some or all of my costs. I am looking at some FSA carbon or shimano Ultegra.

#1 any advice on cranks I am looking at or what I should be looking at

#2 what all will I need to get and how much to change it out. I am okay with some stuff so far (have done my own derailer adjustments, brakes, cable routing, etc - but this is probably more than I want to do. Should I get a new BB and sell my DA complete? I think as long as crank is shimano 10 speed compatible I should be okay as far as my derailers, etc.
indygreg is offline  
Old 12-10-06, 09:36 PM
  #2  
Over the hill
 
urbanknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,366

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 995 Post(s)
Liked 1,203 Times in 689 Posts
I'm pretty happy with my Nashbar compact, although the chainrings that came with it are crap, so after about 1000 miles I'm spending the money I saved on new chainrings anyway, so FSA might be a better choice for only $60-70 more.

As for installing it yourself, it's not all that hard. You'll need a crank puller and the right size allen wrench (I think 6mm but not sure). You might need to shorten the chain but try it out first (if the rear derailleur doesn't bind up, you're probably fine).

If the new crank is a different type than your old one (square drive, ISIS, etc.) you will need a new bottom bracket, which means you'll also need the correct bottom bracket tool(s) and a large crescent wrench. I also recommend a torque wrench to avoid putting the bb on too loose or too tight. But ff they're the same drive, I would just keep the original bottom bracket to make the switch easier.

last and finally (I know you didn't really want this), I didn't get as much extra gearing out of my compact as I had hoped, so be prepared to look for a larger cassette too if you want to climb. Man or mouse, my knees can't handle the 34/23 up these hills! I will find out next week if a 29 fits on my derailleur.
urbanknight is offline  
Old 12-10-06, 11:22 PM
  #3  
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925

Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It's potentially a lot cheaper and more effective to change the cassette than the crankset/BB.

Or do it right and go to a triple.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers
DMF is offline  
Old 12-10-06, 11:26 PM
  #4  
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Going to a compact from the newer Dura Ace crank is easy. If you stick with Shimano Ultegra, you can use your existing derailleur. FSA recommends using their compact specific front derailleur with their compact crank. The Shimano compact works with a standard Shimano road derailleur. You also won't need a new bottom bracket if you stick with either FSA or Shimano, as they both use Hollowtech II bottom brackets. Personally, I think Shimano cranks are outstanding and would go with an Ultegra, as it is not a noticeable downgrade from Dura Ace and would save you a front derailleur.
seely is offline  
Old 12-11-06, 12:42 AM
  #5  
Over the hill
 
urbanknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,366

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 995 Post(s)
Liked 1,203 Times in 689 Posts
Originally Posted by DMF
It's potentially a lot cheaper and more effective to change the cassette than the crankset/BB.

Or do it right and go to a triple.
The only problem with a triple is you need a new brifter, front derailleur, bottom bracket, and sometimes even a long cage rear derailleur. Too expensive, which is why I haven't switched. But I understand your opinion, as I would get a triple if I could go back in time and purchase my bike over again.
urbanknight is offline  
Old 12-11-06, 07:18 AM
  #6  
Duathlete
Thread Starter
 
indygreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Triple is not an option. Not becuase I am against them or having one - I am just not about to replace that much DA equipment to get there.
Sounds like Ultegra is the way to go . . . keep most of my stuff and keep it simple. I will still look a little at FSA and how much a front D would cost me.
indygreg is offline  
Old 12-11-06, 09:33 AM
  #7  
Over the hill
 
urbanknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,366

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 995 Post(s)
Liked 1,203 Times in 689 Posts
I doubt you'll need a new FD with the FSA. I ran compacts as a junior because of gear restrictions and never thought the change the FD. Same with my current compact which is similar to the FSA. But the Ultegra is nice stuff as well.
urbanknight is offline  
Old 12-11-06, 10:30 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As someone already said, changing the cassette might be an easier option. You can get a 12-27 cassette, which would give you gearing almost as low as a compact.

The FC-R700 (ultegra-level compact) is a pretty good deal at about $200 on eBay. It weighs a bit more than the Dura Ace, but should be a pretty good crank.
Phoible is offline  
Old 12-11-06, 11:49 AM
  #9  
Duathlete
Thread Starter
 
indygreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a 12-27 cassette. Before you laugh, let me explain. I am a n00b and know I will get stonger (I am a runner and a swimmer, just not in bike shape yet). On my rides so far, which included some uphill into wind miles late on a ride this weekend when I was about totally spent) I have been okay with the bottom gears . . . but I used the 25 and 27 cogs with the little ring on the front. I have only gone into my big ring 'just to do it' at this point. My thought is that I am using my lowest gears now and not getting close to my tops . . . shouldn't I look to something more in the middle? In other words - I would rather not use my lowest gear on a ride. I know I am a long ways away from not having enough on the top end . . . just do not see me getting to that point - My focus is Triathlon.
indygreg is offline  
Old 12-11-06, 12:55 PM
  #10  
Over the hill
 
urbanknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,366

Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 995 Post(s)
Liked 1,203 Times in 689 Posts
No shame in what gearing you choose. I used to compete nationally, and have now been back on the bike for 8 months, and I am about to add a 13-29 cassette to my compact 50/34. I am going with these gears because I have started doing a lot of climbing, and sustained climbs at steep grades are murder on the knees unless you can keep the cadence up.

Anybody who argues your choice of gearing without knowing your strength, the grades of the hills you climb, your personal goals, etc. is a macho fool.
urbanknight is offline  
Old 12-11-06, 01:19 PM
  #11  
Mmmmm potatoes
 
idcruiserman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,921
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I bought a new Shimano R700 compact crank on craig's list and installed it on my cross bike. It replaced a CODA 53/39 crankset. I installed new cables and housings, and I moved the front derailleur (105 9x2) down to compensate. No problems with shifting at all, and I'm happy with the gearing.
idcruiserman is offline  
Old 12-11-06, 03:13 PM
  #12  
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925

Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by indygreg
In other words - I would rather not use my lowest gear on a ride. I know I am a long ways away from not having enough on the top end . . . just do not see me getting to that point - My focus is Triathlon.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't most triathlon courses pretty flat? For tri, then, you'd want tall gearing, even if you're not there now. Why not look at a compact now and keep the DA crank for later?

You can get a Ritchey for $70 on eBay, but it needs an Octalink BB ($30-60 or so). All your other options seem to be in the $200 range.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers
DMF is offline  
Old 12-11-06, 03:35 PM
  #13  
Banned.
 
Turboem1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 883

Bikes: Lemond Reno

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
whats the difference between a compact double and a regular double?
Turboem1 is offline  
Old 12-11-06, 03:42 PM
  #14  
Duathlete
Thread Starter
 
indygreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Good point on keeping the DA crank if I get a compact.

The difference is 5 teeth on the small ring (5 teeth smaller) and like 2 on the big. The info is out there, I am just not able to grab it at this second
indygreg is offline  
Old 12-11-06, 04:32 PM
  #15  
Mmmmm potatoes
 
idcruiserman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,921
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
53/39 std versus 50/34 R700.

I wouldn't sell the spare parts, especially DA stuff.
idcruiserman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.