Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-01-07, 12:01 PM   #1
bfloyd
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ohio
Bikes: vintage Raleigh
Posts: 654
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
96er front end question

I posted this in the mtb forum but perhaps it would be better here. I am converting to a 96er using my GT Zum mtb and was wondering if I should use a 26in. rigid fork with the 700c wheel (with disk brake) or if I would need to use a 700c rigid fork. I would be using a cross wheel and tire (700 x 32) so the width would not be too much of an issue, pending it will fit in the 26in. rigid fork (I tried and it fit into the stock 26in. 50mm suspension fork but I think that the suspension fork has more width clearance?). I would think that if possible I should try to keep the front end as low and as close to original geometry as possible? Thanks.
bfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 01:53 PM   #2
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Rans Rockst (Retro rocket) Rans Enduro Sport (Retro racket) Catrike 559, Merin Bear Valley (beater bike).
Posts: 26,739
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Can't say for sure about your particular fork and tire combination but, when I built my fixed gear, I used 700 X 23 wheels and tires with a 26" fork. Standard drop caliper brake works fine for me and I have sufficient clearance for some larger tires if I choose.
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 06:31 PM   #3
bfloyd
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ohio
Bikes: vintage Raleigh
Posts: 654
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the reply.
bfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 06:49 PM   #4
seely
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 5,088
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I would use a Surly 1x1 26" fork with a 29" wheel. Should be no clearance issues since it is designed to clear a 3" tire. You will have to use a disc brake, but no problem since the 1x1 fork has a disc option. The 29er forks are significantly longer than a 26" wheel fork. The ZUM, as I recall, is pre-suspension correction or designed around short travel forks. Adding a longer fork + a taller wheel will make the bike handle horribly in my experience.
seely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-07, 07:04 AM   #5
bfloyd
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ohio
Bikes: vintage Raleigh
Posts: 654
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by seely
I would use a Surly 1x1 26" fork with a 29" wheel. Should be no clearance issues since it is designed to clear a 3" tire. You will have to use a disc brake, but no problem since the 1x1 fork has a disc option. The 29er forks are significantly longer than a 26" wheel fork. The ZUM, as I recall, is pre-suspension correction or designed around short travel forks. Adding a longer fork + a taller wheel will make the bike handle horribly in my experience.
Thanks, yes the fork is a 50mm, short travel. Though isn't the suspension mtb fork longer than a 700c rigid fork?
bfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:47 AM.