Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Ciclista paolo666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Santa Barbara, California
    My Bikes
    2005 Specialized Sequoia, Specialized Crossroad Commuting bike, 70s Bianchi Singlespeed/Fixie (built by me), Giant "shopping" bike, 70s Rossin (custom built), and a few more "projects"
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    "Compacting" a triple

    I have a 2005 specialized Sequoia, currently with a Shimano Sora triple. As it turns out, I _never_ use the 30 chainring. So, I was wondering, why not getting rid of it. My questions for the experts would be:
    1) Am I thinking of doing something really dumb?
    2) How can I rig the Sora front derailer to “click” just twice?

    Thank you in advance,

  2. #2
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In other words, you want to limit the crank to just the 53 and 42 rings?
    .cinelli.olympic.surly.long.haul.trucker.kona.ku.surly.steamroller.
    .litespeed.classic.litespeed.firenze.bianchi.pista.dean.colonel.plus.more.

  3. #3
    Ciclista paolo666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Santa Barbara, California
    My Bikes
    2005 Specialized Sequoia, Specialized Crossroad Commuting bike, 70s Bianchi Singlespeed/Fixie (built by me), Giant "shopping" bike, 70s Rossin (custom built), and a few more "projects"
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by The Fixer
    In other words, you want to limit the crank to just the 53 and 42 rings?
    As a first step... I also would not mind losing the 42 ring (steel in the Sora) in favor of an aluminum one (maybe a 39-40T? I guess I'd have to figure out if I'd have "gaps" when shifting from one chainring to the other)...

  4. #4
    Senior Member gpelpel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Lafayette, CA
    My Bikes
    Time VXRS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR
    Posts
    2,498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, you can put a 39 instead in the 42 and get rid of the 30. You will have to adjust the internal limit screw of the derailleur to prevent it to move the chain down from the 39 ring. That's easy to do.
    Another option would be to buy a new crankset (Ultegra double) and sell the Sora triple.

  5. #5
    Senior Member MrCjolsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Davis CA
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-Check, '85 Giant road bike (unrecogizable fixed-gear conversion
    Posts
    3,954
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Your Sora shifter will always click three times. If you set the limit screw on your front derailleur to only drop to the middle ring, the third click just won't do anything.

    IMHO, the advantages of a compact double are as follows:

    1. Less weight. But with the Sequoia, you have a virtual smorgasbord of possible upgrades to save weight if that's your fetish.

    2. A double does shift a little smoother than a triple. But this doesn't really become a reality until you switch to a short cage derailleur in the back and move the chainline in. If you still use the Sora shifters, you could still be running into trim issues.

    3. Compact doubles are great if you already are running a 53-39 double and want better gears for climbing but don't want the expense of "upgrading" to a triple. Not your situation.

    I'd keep the triple. You can put a smaller middle ring on the bike. You'll use granny ring even less but your ratios will be closer. I had Sora with the same gearing as you have on my Trek 1000. When I swapped the 42t for a 39t I found I didn't have a big gap right where I liked to ride.

  6. #6
    In beaurocratic limbo urbanknight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez, K2 Razorback
    Posts
    22,457
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Unless you're changing to a shorter bottom bracket spindle, you won't be gaining anything by removing the inner ring, just losing the ability to use it. If you want the benefit of a triple, you'll want to at least change the bottom bracket, and as mentioned above, maybe the cranks.

  7. #7
    Ciclista paolo666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Santa Barbara, California
    My Bikes
    2005 Specialized Sequoia, Specialized Crossroad Commuting bike, 70s Bianchi Singlespeed/Fixie (built by me), Giant "shopping" bike, 70s Rossin (custom built), and a few more "projects"
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks to all for the great responses. I wonder if this is indeed worth the trouble (I'm not a weight fetishist but I do like to, ahem, "improve" things

    Happy New Year to all!

  8. #8
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    My Bikes
    03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
    Posts
    6,887
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    IMO, it's not worth doing.
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •