Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-30-07, 04:09 PM   #1
Autobus
Commuting Fool
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Bikes: Raleigh Rush Hour (SS/fixie)
Posts: 342
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Does a 130 bcd chainring preferred over a 110 bcd?

Looking for a track ring and I see these two bcds offered.

Does the 130 mm bcd provide more leverage or some other advantage over a 110 mm bcd chainring?
Autobus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 04:12 PM   #2
barba
Senior Member
 
barba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Do you already have a crank? If so get the one that matches the BCD of your crank. If you are starting from scratch, you will find different ranges on sizes more common in one standard or the other. There is also 144BCD.
barba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 04:15 PM   #3
jjciiijs
Senior Member
 
jjciiijs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: CO....Hetchins MO, Merlin XL, Trek, Klien, Specialized, Kestral, Bataglin, Guerciotti, Bianchi, Schwinn, Colnago Geo, Miele, Contini, Feggin, Cannondale, Lemond, Ciocc, Giant, Rossin
Bikes: Hetchins MO, Merlin XL, Trek, Klien, Specialized, Bataglin, Guerciotti, Bianchi, Schwinn C19, Colnago Geo, Miele, Contini, Feggin,Cannondale, Lemond,Ciocc, Giant, Rossin
Posts: 386
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
130mm offers less flex.
jjciiijs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 04:15 PM   #4
roadfix
hello
 
roadfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes:
Posts: 18,570
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Do you have a crankset yet? Is this for a street fixie/track or for a mountain single speed?
roadfix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 06:35 PM   #5
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The advantrage is that 130bcd rings are everywhere since they are road standard. 110 bcd is garbage.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 06:40 PM   #6
jim-bob
hateful little monkey
 
jim-bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: oakland, ca
Bikes:
Posts: 5,274
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator
The advantrage is that 130bcd rings are everywhere since they are road standard. 110 bcd is garbage.
Garbage? How do you figure?
jim-bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 06:43 PM   #7
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Because it's hard to find rings in any shop?

Where are you going to find a 1/8 110 bcd ring? Eh?
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 06:47 PM   #8
jim-bob
hateful little monkey
 
jim-bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: oakland, ca
Bikes:
Posts: 5,274
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't bother with 1/8". 3/32" 110bcd rings are pretty ubiquitous, and are available all the way from 33t to 60t or so.
jim-bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 06:54 PM   #9
fiver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Eugene OR
Bikes: VooDoo Limba, 2000 GF Kai Tai, old lugged fixies
Posts: 130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
110 is a fairly popular size actually. Especially since the compact crank revolution lately. If you ever want to run as low as a 34T chainring, up to a 50T, then go with 110. If you only want big rings up front, go for the 130.
Quote:
Where are you going to find a 1/8 110 bcd ring? Eh?
This is how I've always set up my track bike, normal chain rings work fine.
fiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 08:27 PM   #10
urbanknight
In beaurocratic limbo
 
urbanknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Bikes: Specialized Allez, K2 Razorback
Posts: 22,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Normal chainrings may work for the average joe, but 1/8 rings flex less and seem to hold a better chainline (imo) on real track bikes, plus iirc chainring bolts sometimes bottom out on the thinner rings, requiring washers to make them work.
urbanknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 09:26 PM   #11
jim-bob
hateful little monkey
 
jim-bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: oakland, ca
Bikes:
Posts: 5,274
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If they're posting on bikeforums asking for equipment advice, it's a pretty good bet that they're 'the average joe' and not some monster-thighed track crusher.
jim-bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-07, 09:21 PM   #12
Sincitycycler
Senior Member
 
Sincitycycler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
Posts: 3,219
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jim-bob
I don't bother with 1/8". 3/32" 110bcd rings are pretty ubiquitous, and are available all the way from 33t to 60t or so.
What is the advantage of a 3/32 over a 1/8" chain?
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
Sincitycycler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-07, 11:58 PM   #13
urbanknight
In beaurocratic limbo
 
urbanknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Bikes: Specialized Allez, K2 Razorback
Posts: 22,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sincitycycler
What is the advantage of a 3/32 over a 1/8" chain?
Thicker chain is less likely to break, but this is only really applicable with elite and pro track sprinters with massive thighs who put a lot of force on their drivetrain. Most people wouldn't care, but that's the reason single speeds come with 1/8 chains. They will work with 3/32 chainrings and cogs, which explains the argument above on why it shouldn't matter.
__________________
"Well, I guess you can cut the arts as much as you want... Sooner or later, these kids aren't going to have anything to read or write about." (Richard Dreyfus as Glenn Holland)
urbanknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-07, 07:20 AM   #14
Boss Moniker
It's an old photo
 
Boss Moniker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Entropia
Bikes: Cannondale R500, Specialized Hardrock
Posts: 774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sincitycycler
What is the advantage of a 3/32 over a 1/8" chain?
Most have bushings between the rollers and plates so it's slightly smoother. They tend to wear longer because more surface area is contacted. Also, they're pretty ubiquitous for track, so you could swap parts easier on the 'drome. Disadvantages include running louder and slightly more weight.
Boss Moniker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-07, 07:49 AM   #15
wroomwroomoops
Sir Fallalot
 
wroomwroomoops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Bikes:
Posts: 5,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Although I don't have monster thighs (but they're decent, IMHO), I still prefere 1/8" drivetrains, because practice has shown that the 1/8" chainring will outlast several times the 3/32" chainring of similar size and equal material.

1/8" cogs also seem to last longer. This is harder for me to tell exactly, because I haven't paid as much attention as with the chainrings, but the ratio seems about the same.

I can say that a 1/8" chainring can probably outlive 3 3/32" chainrings subjected to the same force and stresses. This is purely my own experience. YMMV.

EDIT: and no, I don't have a clear scientific explanation for this. Such a huge difference is hard to explain.
wroomwroomoops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-07, 07:56 AM   #16
wroomwroomoops
Sir Fallalot
 
wroomwroomoops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Bikes:
Posts: 5,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator
Where are you going to find a 1/8 110 bcd ring? Eh?
Sugino used to make 1/8" chainrings with both 110 and 130 mm BCD holes. God bless them for that.

Noone else, as far as I know.
wroomwroomoops is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 PM.