Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

variation in Sun CR18 rims eyelet construction?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

variation in Sun CR18 rims eyelet construction?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-07, 03:14 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TallRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
variation in Sun CR18 rims eyelet construction?

So the Sun CR18 is a good basic rim: double-walled, pinned/sleeved construction, brushed sidewalls but not machined, and because of these construction methods it's relatively inexpensive. Comes in a bunch of sizes, for BMX, MTB, road and 27" old-school road - it's one of the few "nice" rims (double-wall, eyelets) still made in the 27" (630mm) size.

Anyway, I just saw that Nashbar had 700c CR18 rims for cheap ($13 last week) and ordered one. Sadly, it doesn't have reinforced. Which will be fine for a front wheel (where I intend to use it, built with an LX hub). But it leads me to wonder about the variation in Sun CR18 rims. The CR18 is pictured multiple times (in different categories) on the sun-ringle.com website but all show the same diagram - double-wall rim with eyelets.

On construction method, should I expect the CR18 without reinforced eyelets to be equivalent to the standard CR18, except with smaller spoke-holes drilled? Or would the CR18 without reinforced eyelets also have a thicker outer wall, to be strong enough to not crack despite not having reinforced eyelets.

It's pretty annoying that Nashbar didn't note that this was an atypical CR18 in their description, although it's not bad b/c I'm only out $13.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
TallRider is offline  
Old 04-25-07, 03:25 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times in 741 Posts
I have had three pair of wheels built with Sun "Mistral" 700c semi-aero rims that do not have eyelets. So far these rims have held up well and the two rims that failed did so by cracking through the brake track from abrasive wear, not from any failure at the spoke holes. Yours should be ok despite the poor description.
HillRider is offline  
Old 04-25-07, 04:25 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TallRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
It's funny b/c I've only seen Sun Mistral rims (single-wall rims if I remember correctly) with reinforced eyelets.

I'm figuring the rim will make for a plenty durable wheel, esp. on the front wheel.
But I'm curious if the construction of my rim varies at all from the version with reinforced eyelets, beyond punching wider holes to make room for the reinforcement. Or does my CR18 without reinforced eyelets have a thicker outer wall to make up for the lack of reinforcement, thus making it heavier than the CR18 with reinforced eyelets? Nashbar didn't give a weight for this...
TallRider is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.