feet touching front wheel
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 204
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
feet touching front wheel
My feet touches the front wheel by a decent amount and its really annoying when I'm at a stop where I'm leaning and i turn the wheel in. It doesn't affect my ride because I don't do any sharp turns but i think if i had to ever do an emergency manuever, I may knock myself off the bike.
How can I fix this? My tire is 700x26c. Will getting a smaller wheel (650) help? I hope thats not the solution because that would be expensive. This is an XS Giant OCR1 road bike. I probably should've gone for the SM frame instead of the smallest but I figured I'm pretty short (5'4) and the XS felt better.
How can I fix this? My tire is 700x26c. Will getting a smaller wheel (650) help? I hope thats not the solution because that would be expensive. This is an XS Giant OCR1 road bike. I probably should've gone for the SM frame instead of the smallest but I figured I'm pretty short (5'4) and the XS felt better.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Toe overlap is a pretty common issue. It is usually only an issue at slow speed making tight turns. You will likely get used to it and learn to time your pedal stroke so it is less of an issue.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
too bad,didn't the salesperson try to sell you the correct frame? Answer that first,along with how possible is it to get an exchange,even if it costs you? XS is just TOOOO small for you.You're not THAT short. XS frames are for men UNDER 5',ACTUALLY very short folke(NOT you) ought not to buy that brand and model anyway,I'd explain why for the bennefit of you and others,I don't need to though,the answer to that question's obvious.Can you make an arrangement to off-the-bike??
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by barba
Toe overlap is a pretty common issue. It is usually only an issue at slow speed making tight turns. You will likely get used to it and learn to time your pedal stroke so it is less of an issue.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 204
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The LBS actually recommended that I went with the SM frame but I had a SM before from Giant and felt it was somewhat big on me. I think the frame is right for me. I feel very comfortable on it and have gone on 4-5 hour rides and done close to a century a few times already. Its been very comfortable. Would getting the next bigger frame (SM) solve this problem? I could pass this bike onto my tiny gf who is shorter then me.
#7
hello
In a couple weeks, your toe overlap "problem" won't even be an issue. You'll do just fine....guaranteed.
BTW, all my standard road bikes exhibit toe overlap and my frames average about 53cm.
BTW, all my standard road bikes exhibit toe overlap and my frames average about 53cm.
Last edited by roadfix; 05-03-07 at 08:56 PM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
you MAY want to consider that.I could come-up with Ideas,dudes in this forum could do so as well,some better than I ,I'm sure.I say what I did out of respect.You,anyone deserves the right fit.I have a long history of too small bikes.Not enough for the toe over-lap but smallish none the less.The toe-thing isn't the end of the world,riders DEAL with it,why though?In a way,you may be lucky in that such an obvious problem shows both the flaws in size and design. I spotted that the bike's frame is too small.Even if you needed a frame that small,which you don't, a rider requiring a very small frame can buy a Terry or other female specific or NON fem. specific bikes that suit.I really believe that Giant screwed-up by making that bike period. 650c IS in fact what some COs use,why didn't Giant?.Anyway that point's moot.You ought to have a bigger frame. A smaller wheel will pitch you down,unless a fork can do it.You only need an inch and a half clearence WITH your shoes on,it maybe border-line but I think the next size will fit well.It's only in the smallest sizes that the toe overlap occurs,52 sometimes,MOST of the time UNDER 50cm warrants the use of a smaller front wheel,this is in the "race geometry" which MOST road bikes have
#9
Señor Cardgage Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 349
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am also 5'4" and 145lbs. I have an OCR1 & 2 - both in small and they are perfect ...you really need to get a bike that fits you. My feet are also quite large for my size (44s) and I still don't touch the wheels (700x23). Stand over height was also a big consideration but at 5'4" you too can easily clear the top tube (even without shoes) with a small frame. If you really like the brand, go for the small - "old & new) is right ...a none of us should have to "deal" or "put up" with bikes that we spend good money on and can't enjoy without compromise. I'm done now...let us know how you decide.
Also, How long are your cranks...I use 170 Dura-Ace. you may want to consider shorter cranks...just a suggestion. Good luck!
Also, How long are your cranks...I use 170 Dura-Ace. you may want to consider shorter cranks...just a suggestion. Good luck!
Last edited by 55-11; 05-03-07 at 08:51 PM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Toe overlap isn't limited to very small frames. I have a 55 cm Litespeed and a 56 cm Co-Motion single road bikes, both with a normal (43 mm) rake fork and 700x23 tires. I wear an average shoe size (43) with the cleats positioned about mid-range and I have toe overlap problems with both of them. A friend has the same problem with a 59 cm Litespeed but he wears extrordinarily large shoes (50+).
You have to be aware of the potential for interference when doing tight U-turns but that's about the only time it's an issue.
You have to be aware of the potential for interference when doing tight U-turns but that's about the only time it's an issue.
#11
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
My toe overlaps. Aside from the rub marks on my shoe from waiting at red lights, it has never been a problem.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by HillRider
Toe overlap isn't limited to very small frames. I have a 55 cm Litespeed and a 56 cm Co-Motion single road bikes, both with a normal (43 mm) rake fork and 700x23 tires. I wear an average shoe size (43) with the cleats positioned about mid-range and I have toe overlap problems with both of them. A friend has the same problem with a 59 cm Litespeed but he wears extrordinarily large shoes (50+).
You have to be aware of the potential for interference when doing tight U-turns but that's about the only time it's an issue.
You have to be aware of the potential for interference when doing tight U-turns but that's about the only time it's an issue.
#13
hello
Even on my fixed gear, you instinctively avoid overlapping your toe....and I have major toe overlap and it's never been a problem for me.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by roadfix
Even on my fixed gear, you instinctively avoid overlapping your toe....and I have major toe overlap and it's never been a problem for me.
#15
hello
Originally Posted by old and new
OK,but it's "normal" for it to happen on tightly designed frame like fixed or crit, not road/race bike,this guy does centuries. I'm not being radical here.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 204
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Its a compact geometry frame so would that mean I would have the same problem even if I went to the next size (SM) ? I'm going to stop at the bike shop and whine a little. Most likely they won't have a SM Giant for me to try on at the shop. Would the shop be responsible for the cost of the swap, me, or the mfg Giant if I do decide to change the frame out. It was I that made the decision to go with the XS. The shop did recommend I go with a SM but also said an XS would fit me too b/c I was in between sizes.
I'm more like 5'3.6 (i just like to consider myself 5'4 so i don't feel so short). I previously posted this about 3 months ago when I was going back and forth on the sizes
Original thread about bike size
I'm more like 5'3.6 (i just like to consider myself 5'4 so i don't feel so short). I previously posted this about 3 months ago when I was going back and forth on the sizes
Originally Posted by supertj
I pulled the trigger and ordered an XS. My inseam is a 29.5 and the Small is 29.6 meaning the bar goes right into my crotch. Based on that, I decided to go with XS. Seriously They said I have short legs and longer upper body.
I was at the LBS and we kept on going back and forth on SM and XS. They said either one would probably work for me. I sat on a couple of comparable bikes but that didn't make anything conclusive. Since I already had a SM previously and thought it didn't fit well, its time to try the XS as much as I think it'll look like a kiddie bike, but it'll be a better fit.
I was at the LBS and we kept on going back and forth on SM and XS. They said either one would probably work for me. I sat on a couple of comparable bikes but that didn't make anything conclusive. Since I already had a SM previously and thought it didn't fit well, its time to try the XS as much as I think it'll look like a kiddie bike, but it'll be a better fit.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by supertj
Its a compact geometry frame so would that mean I would have the same problem even if I went to the next size (SM) ? I'm going to stop at the bike shop and whine a little. Most likely they won't have a SM Giant for me to try on at the shop. Would the shop be responsible for the cost of the swap, me, or the mfg Giant if I do decide to change the frame out. It was I that made the decision to go with the XS. The shop did recommend I go with a SM but also said an XS would fit me too b/c I was in between sizes.
I'm more like 5'3.6 (i just like to consider myself 5'4 so i don't feel so short). I previously posted this about 3 months ago when I was going back and forth on the sizes
Original thread about bike size
I'm more like 5'3.6 (i just like to consider myself 5'4 so i don't feel so short). I previously posted this about 3 months ago when I was going back and forth on the sizes
Original thread about bike size
#18
hello
Yes, 650 should be spec'ed on most small frames to keep the geometry in check, plus minimizing toe overlap in some cases.
Last edited by roadfix; 05-04-07 at 10:30 AM.
#19
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
Old and New, toe overlap doesn't necessarily mean the frame is too small. I have rather short legs but average or slightly large feet. Add that to a race geometry and toe overlap happens. I used to race velodrome, in which the frames have even shorter geometry and fork rakes. I still never had a problem despite you not being able to control where your pedals are.
It's important to remember that (1) toe overlap isn't a bad thing in itself. It may or may not be the result from a too small frame, and (2) getting a smaller front wheel (or both wheels) isn't that simple. Bikes are made for a specific size, so if someone decides s/he is small enough to need smaller wheels, a bike built for smaller wheels is needed.
It's important to remember that (1) toe overlap isn't a bad thing in itself. It may or may not be the result from a too small frame, and (2) getting a smaller front wheel (or both wheels) isn't that simple. Bikes are made for a specific size, so if someone decides s/he is small enough to need smaller wheels, a bike built for smaller wheels is needed.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#20
Senior Member
Big frames also have toe-overlap. It's due to having a fairly constant wheelbase with bikes. Learn to have your cranks vertical when turning or slowing to a stop. Optimum cornering form has you putting all your weight on the outside leg which has the pedal at the bottom of the stroke. And having the cranks vertical as you're slowing allows you to have all your weight on the lower pedal while you unclip and step out of the upper one.
#21
:)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: duluth
Posts: 3,391
Bikes: '07 Pista, '09 Fantom Cross Uno, '8? Miyata, '67 Stingray, '0? Zoo mod trials, Tallbike, Chopper, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '67 Triumph Chopper, '69 CB350, '58 BSA Spitfire, '73 CB450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
All of my road bikes have toe-overlap, I've never had an issue with it, even when running a fixed wheel. I was under the assumption that this was the norm.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
A frame size fit should never be based on toe overlap. Effective top tube length to torso is most important.
Toe overlap isn't worth worrying about, it's only possible at speeds of about one mph.
Al
Toe overlap isn't worth worrying about, it's only possible at speeds of about one mph.
Al
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 2,369
Bikes: 2003 Giant OCR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by supertj
My feet touches the front wheel by a decent amount and its really annoying when I'm at a stop where I'm leaning and i turn the wheel in. It doesn't affect my ride because I don't do any sharp turns but i think if i had to ever do an emergency manuever, I may knock myself off the bike.
#24
Señor Cardgage Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 349
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just in case you missed this...
JUST IN CASE YOU MISSED THIS THE FIRST TIME...
Dude... I am nearly or exactly your height, and I have the same model frame -BUT IN SMALL- I can't stress it enough - The SMALL Size OCR1 (not the X-Small) should fit you near perfectly as it does me. Just a side note - my in-seam is 29.5 and my torso fits perfectly on the 53 cm top tube.
I am also 5'4" and 145lbs. I have an OCR1 & 2 - both in small and they are perfect ...you really need to get a bike that fits you. My feet are also quite large for my size (44s) and I still don't touch the wheels (700x23). Stand over height was also a big consideration but at 5'4" you too can easily clear the top tube (even without shoes) with a SMALL frame. If you really like the brand, go for the SMALL - "old & new" is right ...and none of us should have to "deal" or "put up" with bikes that we spend good money on and can't enjoy without compromise. I'm done now...let us know how you decide.
Also, How long are your cranks...I use 170 Dura-Ace. you may want to consider shorter cranks...just a suggestion. Good luck!
Dude... I am nearly or exactly your height, and I have the same model frame -BUT IN SMALL- I can't stress it enough - The SMALL Size OCR1 (not the X-Small) should fit you near perfectly as it does me. Just a side note - my in-seam is 29.5 and my torso fits perfectly on the 53 cm top tube.
I am also 5'4" and 145lbs. I have an OCR1 & 2 - both in small and they are perfect ...you really need to get a bike that fits you. My feet are also quite large for my size (44s) and I still don't touch the wheels (700x23). Stand over height was also a big consideration but at 5'4" you too can easily clear the top tube (even without shoes) with a SMALL frame. If you really like the brand, go for the SMALL - "old & new" is right ...and none of us should have to "deal" or "put up" with bikes that we spend good money on and can't enjoy without compromise. I'm done now...let us know how you decide.
Also, How long are your cranks...I use 170 Dura-Ace. you may want to consider shorter cranks...just a suggestion. Good luck!
#25
Senior Member
So I guess the SMALL OCR1 has just slightly longer wheelbase and just slightly longer top-tube and front-centre that the toes don't overlap compared to the XS? Just 1cm longer top-tube can make the difference.