Brooks B17 Saddle?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 175
Bikes: 90' Trek 1000, Trek 700 cyclocross conversion, Legnano, 54 Indian Scout, 1980 Trek 412, Zeus Professional?, Raleigh Team USA, Raleigh Technium, Scott Spark 60,...
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Brooks B17 Saddle?
Probably the wrong sub-forum, but I spend all my time in this one so....
My 1990 Trek 1000 came (bought it used) with a Ritchie Logic saddle, and I hate it. It's too hard! I am looking at buying a new saddle. I have read that Brooks saddles are supposed to be the most comfortable after they are broken in. I found a Brooks B17 Standard online for $52. Is this the way to go. Or would I be better off getting a different modle of Brooks seat? Or better off buying different seat altogether?
I intend to use the bike for longer distances rides (centurys...), not touring or racing or anything like that.
Thanks,
RJ
My 1990 Trek 1000 came (bought it used) with a Ritchie Logic saddle, and I hate it. It's too hard! I am looking at buying a new saddle. I have read that Brooks saddles are supposed to be the most comfortable after they are broken in. I found a Brooks B17 Standard online for $52. Is this the way to go. Or would I be better off getting a different modle of Brooks seat? Or better off buying different seat altogether?
I intend to use the bike for longer distances rides (centurys...), not touring or racing or anything like that.
Thanks,
RJ
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
You'll never know for sure if a Brooks saddle is for you until you try one. The B17 is their best selling model so I'd say that would be the one to try.
My personal experience has been that the long break in period stories are significantly overstated. 100 miles should be enough to shape it to you.
My personal experience has been that the long break in period stories are significantly overstated. 100 miles should be enough to shape it to you.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Recommending saddles is an exercise in futility. The fit and comfort are so subjective that a saddle that one rider loves is torture to another.
Brooks saddles do have their fans and the only question is does the saddle "break in" to you or do you "break in" to the saddle. In either case it seems to take a lot of riding time. A B17 for $52 sounds very good (assuming it's new) as even Nashbar wants $70 for the lowest cost version.
My favorite saddle is the Avocet 02 Mens and I have them on all my bikes. They are getting hard to find and Avocet seems shaky so when the last ones dies I'm going to have the same problem you do.
Specialized has a saddle fitting concept that seems to work fairly well so a trip to a Specialized dealer may be worth while.
Brooks saddles do have their fans and the only question is does the saddle "break in" to you or do you "break in" to the saddle. In either case it seems to take a lot of riding time. A B17 for $52 sounds very good (assuming it's new) as even Nashbar wants $70 for the lowest cost version.
My favorite saddle is the Avocet 02 Mens and I have them on all my bikes. They are getting hard to find and Avocet seems shaky so when the last ones dies I'm going to have the same problem you do.
Specialized has a saddle fitting concept that seems to work fairly well so a trip to a Specialized dealer may be worth while.
#4
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Posts: 6,017
Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The Brooks saddles hold their value very well and also you can buy from wallbike.com and he has a 6 month satisfaction guarantee. That said, none of us here can tell you if you will like it, we can only speak for ourselves. I own 4 of those saddles and love them.
Search this forum and the web for Brooks B17 and you'll find that most of the world agrees.
Search this forum and the web for Brooks B17 and you'll find that most of the world agrees.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,845
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,822 Times
in
1,541 Posts
My experience, YMMV. I have a B-17 that i found to be comfortable from day one. my caveats: I have always preferred "non-cushy" saddles (tried a gel once....didn't like), I have not put many mile on the saddle yet and no long rides (It is on my jump on and do the errand bike). I did proofride it and than it sat for several months before the build was done don't know is this made a difference. But all in all I was surprised at how comfortable the saddle was...non broken in.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
The Brooks leather saddles are pretty hard - it's thick, full-grain leather. If you want a soft and padded saddle, it's not for you. But it may actually work for you even if you want a soft and padded saddle (in which case you'd simply be misinformed about which saddle works best for you.
The Brooks saddles break in to fit your rear, and most of the comfort action is from the "hammock" effect of the leather being suspended between front and rear attachment points, and the broken-in fit.
For some people, the Brooks shape is comfortable right away and only gets better with break-in (see my experience below). Other people have to tough it through break-in and then have a comfy saddle. A minority never get comfortable with the saddle.
I've got a Brooks B17 on my Centurion Comp TA (see link in my sig) and found the shape fits me well even prior to break-in. Now that I've got 850 miles on the saddle, it's even more comfortable. Especially comfortable for more upright riding posture, although I don't mind mine even when I'm hammering in the drops. But the B17 isn't ideal for a really low, aerodynamic riding posture. Brooks makes some other saddles (the Professional and the Swallow) which are designed more for that function.
I've used Brooks Proofide to break in my saddle, but other stuff can help breakin happen more quickly. This voids the warranty, but works fine and it's not as if many people end up sending their saddle back to Brooks so voiding the warranty is unlikely to be much of a risk.
The Brooks saddles break in to fit your rear, and most of the comfort action is from the "hammock" effect of the leather being suspended between front and rear attachment points, and the broken-in fit.
For some people, the Brooks shape is comfortable right away and only gets better with break-in (see my experience below). Other people have to tough it through break-in and then have a comfy saddle. A minority never get comfortable with the saddle.
I've got a Brooks B17 on my Centurion Comp TA (see link in my sig) and found the shape fits me well even prior to break-in. Now that I've got 850 miles on the saddle, it's even more comfortable. Especially comfortable for more upright riding posture, although I don't mind mine even when I'm hammering in the drops. But the B17 isn't ideal for a really low, aerodynamic riding posture. Brooks makes some other saddles (the Professional and the Swallow) which are designed more for that function.
I've used Brooks Proofide to break in my saddle, but other stuff can help breakin happen more quickly. This voids the warranty, but works fine and it's not as if many people end up sending their saddle back to Brooks so voiding the warranty is unlikely to be much of a risk.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
89 Posts
Originally Posted by timcupery
I've got a Brooks B17........... and found the shape fits me well even prior to break-in.
#8
"Purgatory Central"
Join Date: May 2005
Location: beautiful "Cypress Gardens" florida
Posts: 1,757
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
[QUOTE]
same here. Also a big "plus one" for what 'tincuppery' said.
My Brooks 'Pro' was comfortable straight out of the green box, and it seems even more comfortable without padded shorts. Clearly the most comfortable saddle I've ever owned. I dont even have to 'suit up' either, just hop on the bike with whatever knock around shorts I'm wearing and ride.
love my brooks
Originally Posted by well biked
+1.......my Brooks B17 was comfortable enough right out of the box for me to not need padded shorts. Keep in mind, "comfortable" does not mean soft, however.
same here. Also a big "plus one" for what 'tincuppery' said.
My Brooks 'Pro' was comfortable straight out of the green box, and it seems even more comfortable without padded shorts. Clearly the most comfortable saddle I've ever owned. I dont even have to 'suit up' either, just hop on the bike with whatever knock around shorts I'm wearing and ride.
love my brooks
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Clinton Hill, Brooklyn
Posts: 508
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by rjacob
I hate it. It's too hard!
Just to throw in my 2c, I would also recommend the San Marco Rolls - it has proved tremendously comfortable for me on century-length rides.
My next saddle is a Brooks though - I need to experience the magic for myself...
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 175
Bikes: 90' Trek 1000, Trek 700 cyclocross conversion, Legnano, 54 Indian Scout, 1980 Trek 412, Zeus Professional?, Raleigh Team USA, Raleigh Technium, Scott Spark 60,...
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
A B17 for $52 sounds very good (assuming it's new) as even Nashbar wants $70 for the lowest cost version.
https://www.lickbike.com/productpage.asp?PART_NUM_SUB='0906-05'
I went ahead and ordered one along with the Proofride and the seat wrench. I am looking forward to trying out.
As far as my current seat being too hard, it is hard plastic covered by only a thin padding. I think it is the only saddle I have ever really disliked.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
89 Posts
Originally Posted by rjacob
I went ahead and ordered one along with the Proofride and the seat wrench.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 175
Bikes: 90' Trek 1000, Trek 700 cyclocross conversion, Legnano, 54 Indian Scout, 1980 Trek 412, Zeus Professional?, Raleigh Team USA, Raleigh Technium, Scott Spark 60,...
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by well biked
Don't use the wrench unless the saddle is stretched noticeably, which will likely be a long, long time if it happens at all-
#13
Junior Member
Originally Posted by well biked
Don't use the wrench unless the saddle is stretched noticeably, which will likely be a long, long time if it happens at all-
__________________
“He's all over his machine” - Phil Liggett
“He's all over his machine” - Phil Liggett
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 263
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So what's the difference between a B17 Narrow and the Team Professional? Thicker leather and bigger rivets on the Pro, or is there a shape difference too?