Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-25-07, 08:40 PM   #1
Jed19 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Will this Work? If so, How?

I have a Cannondale CAAD8 Optimo 1 Triple with a Shimano Ultegra FC-6603, 10-Speed, 52-39-30 crank. I upgraded to the Shimano from the stock TruVativ Elita 3.2 crank.

I am thinking of swapping the 39t middle chainring with a 42t middle chainring. By the way, the front derailleur is a Shimano 105.

My questions are these:

1) I can't, for the life of me, find a 42t, 10-Speed, FC-6603 Shimano Ultegra chainring on the web;

2) Can I make this work, If I can find the chainring?;

3) Am I setting myself up for shifting problems? I mean, am I going to have problems with either the shift from the 30t ring to the 42t ring, or vice versa; or are there gonna be problems with the 42t ring shift to the 52t or vice versa?

4) If I do get my hands on an appropriate 42t, 10-Speed chainring, am I gonna have to lengthen my present chain to cover all my gear shiftings, or can I keep my present chain-length?

5) Can somebody hook me up with a link to where I can find the appropriate 42t chainring?

I am thinking the sweet spot for my cycling is gonna be found with a 42t 10-Speed middle chainring. I may be wrong, but I am willing to try and find out, especially if it's not gonna cost me my first-born child.

I am currently a little over half-way recovered from a badly-broken femur, hence my experiment. The 39t is too easy, the 52t is hard, and the 30t is exclusively reserved for hills. I still cannot stand up and pedal up hills, but things are getting better each day.

Thanks for all responses.

Regards,
__________________
Regards,

Jed
Jed19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-07, 08:52 PM   #2
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,852
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 66 Post(s)
1. Try Shimano's web site. If they don't list it they don't make it.

2. Sure but the front derailleur won't be ideal

3. The shift from the 30 to the middle probably won't change. The fd might have interference problems with the larger 42T middle and you may have to raise it to clear. That will make the shifting worse.

4. No. Chain length is determined by the largest chainring and largest cog. The smaller ones don't matter.

5. No clue. Try a 9-speed ring?
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-07, 09:09 PM   #3
cascade168
Klaatu barada nikto
 
cascade168's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern NH
Bikes:
Posts: 1,453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
QBP carries a 5/130 42t Ultegra FC6503 chainring. They don't show a 105 42t ring.

Talk to your LBS to order.
cascade168 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-07, 09:10 PM   #4
Sheldon Brown
Gone, but not forgotten
 
Sheldon Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Bikes: See: http://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Posts: 2,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUCAS
I have a Cannondale CAAD8 Optimo 1 Triple with a Shimano Ultegra FC-6603, 10-Speed, 52-39-30 crank. I upgraded to the Shimano from the stock TruVativ Elita 3.2 crank.

I am thinking of swapping the 39t middle chainring with a 42t middle chainring. By the way, the front derailleur is a Shimano 105.

My questions are these:

1) I can't, for the life of me, find a 42t, 10-Speed, FC-6603 Shimano Ultegra chainring on the web;

2) Can I make this work, If I can find the chainring?;

3) Am I setting myself up for shifting problems? I mean, am I going to have problems with either the shift from the 30t ring to the 42t ring, or vice versa; or are there gonna be problems with the 42t ring shift to the 52t or vice versa?

4) If I do get my hands on an appropriate 42t, 10-Speed chainring, am I gonna have to lengthen my present chain to cover all my gear shiftings, or can I keep my present chain-length?

5) Can somebody hook me up with a link to where I can find the appropriate 42t chainring?

I am thinking the sweet spot for my cycling is gonna be found with a 42t 10-Speed middle chainring. I may be wrong, but I am willing to try and find out, especially if it's not gonna cost me my first-born child.

I am currently a little over half-way recovered from a badly-broken femur, hence my experiment. The 39t is too easy, the 52t is hard, and the 30t is exclusively reserved for hills. I still cannot stand up and pedal up hills, but things are getting better each day.
The stuff about "n-speed" chainrings is mostly marketing hype, don't worry about it.

You do want a "middle" 42 so it will have the ramps and pins to help upshift from the 30 (or other small ring, if you wind up upgrading your bottom end.)

For the front derailer, ideally you want a "9-speed" model, not the "10-speed" version. This actually isn't about the chain width, it's about the 39-52 jump vs the 42-52 jump.

The "10-speed" model has a deeper inner cage plate. To use it with a 42, you will need to raise it up to keep the inner plate from bumping into the teeth of the 42. The higher mounting will degrade shifting to the 52.

Maybe you should consider going to a tighter cassette instead.

See: http://sheldonbrown.com/gears and run some numbers.

You don't need to change the chain, because chain length is set to the _big_ ring, and you're not changing that.

Sheldon "Gears" Brown
Sheldon Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-07, 09:14 PM   #5
Banzai
Jet Jockey
 
Banzai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD9, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Nashbar X-frame bike.
Posts: 4,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
30-39-52 is actually a much more even progression than 30-42-52. I think that's why Shimano has started making them that way.

I agree with Mr. Brown...perhaps look at tightening up your rear cassette. Or loosening it to make the 52t "easier".
__________________
Good night...and good luck
Banzai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-07, 01:20 AM   #6
Jed19 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thank you all for the practical responses. I think I'll take Mr. Brown's advice, run some numbers on his gear calculator, and start playing around with different cassettes to see what I can come up with.

The problem I do foresee is cost. I have Dura-Ace FH-7800, 10-Speed rear hubs, and they just do not work with cheap cassettes.

Once again, thanks to all that responded.

Regards,
__________________
Regards,

Jed
Jed19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 11:13 AM   #7
Jed19 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The tightest Ultegra cassette Shimano makes is (11-23)t. Am I gonna notice much difference between this cassette and my currently installed (12-25)t cassette?

Also, I assume my present chainlength does not need any shortening in going to a (11-23)t from a (12-25)t.

Assumption correct?

Regards,
__________________
Regards,

Jed
Jed19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 11:18 AM   #8
DMF 
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Posts: 6,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yes.

Maybe. Measure it.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers
DMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 12:29 PM   #9
Sheldon Brown
Gone, but not forgotten
 
Sheldon Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Bikes: See: http://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Posts: 2,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUCAS
The tightest Ultegra cassette Shimano makes is (11-23)t. Am I gonna notice much difference between this cassette and my currently installed (12-25)t cassette?

Also, I assume my present chainlength does not need any shortening in going to a (11-23)t from a (12-25)t.
Basically, you'll be giving up your lowest gear, for no benefit. If you live in the flatlands, that's no problem, but you wont have any use for the 11 if you're running full sized wheels and a typical "road" chainwheel set.

The chain length won't be an issue, but if your present chain has more than a few hundred miles on it you should replace it anyway...generally good practice to replace the chain when installing a new cluster.

Sheldon "11? Why?" Brown
Sheldon Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 01:56 PM   #10
Jed19 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
Basically, you'll be giving up your lowest gear, for no benefit. If you live in the flatlands, that's no problem, but you wont have any use for the 11 if you're running full sized wheels and a typical "road" chainwheel set.

The chain length won't be an issue, but if your present chain has more than a few hundred miles on it you should replace it anyway...generally good practice to replace the chain when installing a new cluster.

Sheldon "11? Why?" Brown
Thanks Sheldon. Point well-taken. I'll stick with my (12-25)t cassette. I just wish there is a way I can finagle a higher range of gears with my 39t mid-ring and some of the back clusters.

Regards,
__________________
Regards,

Jed
Jed19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 04:10 PM   #11
DMF 
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Posts: 6,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Try using the big ring. That's what it's for.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers
DMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 05:51 PM   #12
Jed19 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMF
Try using the big ring. That's what it's for.
Well, if you had taken the time to read my original post carefully, you would have seen my mentioning the fact that "I am a little past half-way" in recovering from a broken femur.

I do like the big ring, and look forward to the day I can really crank that 52t monster, but for now, I've got to make do with my 39t ring most of the time. I was just hoping for a little more taller gears from a "possible" cassette range that could work in combination with my 39t ring in giving me slightly more challenging rides.

Regards,
__________________
Regards,

Jed
Jed19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 05:59 PM   #13
serpico7
Senior Member
 
serpico7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Bikes:
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUCAS
Well, if you had taken the time to read my original post carefully, you would have seen my mentioning the fact that "I am a little past half-way" in recovering from a broken femur.

I do like the big ring, and look forward to the day I can really crank that 52t monster, but for now, I've got to make do with my 39t ring most of the time. I was just hoping for a little more taller gears from a "possible" cassette range that could work in combination with my 39t ring in giving me slightly more challenging rides.

Regards,
This doesn't make any sense. A bigger gear is a bigger gear. Your femur can't tell if it's the big ring/bigger cog or middle ring/smaller cog.
serpico7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 06:36 PM   #14
Sheldon Brown
Gone, but not forgotten
 
Sheldon Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Bikes: See: http://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Posts: 2,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUCAS
Thanks Sheldon. Point well-taken. I'll stick with my (12-25)t cassette. I just wish there is a way I can finagle a higher range of gears with my 39t mid-ring and some of the back clusters.
Not sure exactly what you're trying to do, but it sounds to me as if all you need is a bigger middle ring, maybe the ubiquitous 42 tooth size? For optimal shifting you would want a different (so-called "9-speed") front derailer. Try your existing one first though, it will probably work well enough.

Sheldon "Life, The Universe And Everything" Brown
Code:
+----------------------------------------------------+
|  I admit that reason is a small and feeble flame,  |
|  a flickering torch by stumblers carried in the    |
|  star-less night, -- blown and flared by passion's |
|  storm, -- and yet, it is the only light.          |
|  Extinguish that, and nought remains.              |
|                        -- Robert Green Ingersoll   |
+----------------------------------------------------+
Sheldon Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 06:37 PM   #15
Jed19 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serpico7
This doesn't make any sense. A bigger gear is a bigger gear. Your femur can't tell if it's the big ring/bigger cog or middle ring/smaller cog.
I currently find the 52t ring hard, and the 39t ring not challenging enough. I was actually looking for a 42t ring to replace the 39t with, but alas, I can't find a 10-Speed, 42t, Shimano Ultegra ring.

The next best thing is thus to see if I can find a Shimano 10-Speed cassette that can give me gears that are a bit taller than what I currently get at 39 x (12-25). But it looks like I am out of luck.

I can assure you that my femur certainly likes the 39t ring at present very very much. I can spin forever in 39 x 15 at present.

A 42 x 15 would be nice, not to talk of being more challenging, hence my original search for a 42t, 10-Speed ring.

Regards,
__________________
Regards,

Jed
Jed19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 06:40 PM   #16
serpico7
Senior Member
 
serpico7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Bikes:
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ummm, get a clue: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/

Quote:
Originally Posted by LUCAS
A 42 x 15 would be nice, not to talk of being more challenging, hence my original search for a 42t, 10-Speed ring.
Shift into your big ring and 19t cog on back. That's an even smaller gear than 42x15. You can thank me later.

Last edited by serpico7; 06-28-07 at 06:45 PM.
serpico7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 07:37 PM   #17
DMF 
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Posts: 6,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serpico7
This doesn't make any sense. A bigger gear is a bigger gear. Your femur can't tell if it's the big ring/bigger cog or middle ring/smaller cog.
+1
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers
DMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 08:31 PM   #18
Sheldon Brown
Gone, but not forgotten
 
Sheldon Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Bikes: See: http://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Posts: 2,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUCAS
I currently find the 52t ring hard, and the 39t ring not challenging enough. I was actually looking for a 42t ring to replace the 39t with, but alas, I can't find a 10-Speed, 42t, Shimano Ultegra ring.

The next best thing is thus to see if I can find a Shimano 10-Speed cassette that can give me gears that are a bit taller than what I currently get at 39 x (12-25). But it looks like I am out of luck.
There's no need for it to be a Shimano ring, any 130 ring designed for the middle position will work with your crank. In addition to Shimano, we carry the excellent TA rings from France.

The stuff about chainrings being "n-speed" specific is basically marketing hype. Pay no attention to such designations.

Sheldon "130" Brown
Sheldon Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 PM.