Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    What? Carbon Based's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    1980s Pinarello Treviso
    Posts
    167
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Carbon fork damage-is this significant?

    I just purchased a Serotta Ti frame with EMS carbon fork that I'm starting to build up. I'm a little worried about the fork though, as there seems to be some damage to its top layer. Is this damage potentially dangerous? Should I replace the fork? I'm hoping its mainly cosmetic, as the project is stretching my budget as it is.

    Pictures here:
    (click for larger)

  2. #2
    cyclist/gearhead/cycli... moxfyre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    DC / Maryland suburbs
    My Bikes
    Homebuilt tourer/commuter, modified-beyond-recognition 1990 Trek 1100, reasonably stock 2002-ish Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo
    Posts
    4,172
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hard to be SURE from the photo, but that does look purely cosmetic to me. You may want to find out the thickness of the fork tubing and compare that to the depth of the scratch.
    My bikes | Linux and Python stuff | Photo gallery

    Sheldon Brown, I miss you. Thanks for the advice, ideas, humor, and infectious enthusiasm for everything bikes...

  3. #3
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    My Bikes
    03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
    Posts
    6,896
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looks like a long split running the full diagonal of the picture frame. If it's not a trick of the pic, yeah, I'd say it's significant. Try contacting EMS.
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    910
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looks like the clear coat got chipped off from the picture, with partial clear-coat delimination. Do the tap test to make sure the under-layers are not delaminated.

  5. #5
    What? Carbon Based's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    1980s Pinarello Treviso
    Posts
    167
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DMF
    Looks like a long split running the full diagonal of the picture frame. If it's not a trick of the pic, yeah, I'd say it's significant. Try contacting EMS.
    I think this is just some sort of join line from manufacturing, as it runs the full length of the fork on both sides and the inside and outside. I'm more worried about the scratching/"peeling"

  6. #6
    In beaurocratic limbo urbanknight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez, K2 Razorback
    Posts
    22,457
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you're 100% SURE it's just the lamination, you're fine. If you're 99.9% of less, I wouldn't risk it. I have a fork sitting next to my computer right now because I'm not sure (the front wheel failed and struck the legs). It's only here so I can take measurements and ask ebay sellers to measure the same, and hopefully find a fork with the same dimensions. I went over the bars once, and don't plan on risking it again.

  7. #7
    Hammer Time C_LOGAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Australia
    My Bikes
    Paconi, Hillman, Sun Tourer + Mongoose Tetra SX
    Posts
    258
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In regards to the picture - it appears that the layer underneath is a little rippled - is the carbon dented at all?? I am no expert, but it looks like more damage than just a scratch, or maybe just bad lighting?

    I would like to suggest that you buy a cro-mo fork. A lot more reliable - never really have to worry about them snapping like twigs.

    I would never ride bike with any carbon on it. I don't even trust aluminium - except my Mongoose Tetra SX Mountain bike which has thick tubing with big welds and reinforcements.

  8. #8
    cyclist/gearhead/cycli... moxfyre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    DC / Maryland suburbs
    My Bikes
    Homebuilt tourer/commuter, modified-beyond-recognition 1990 Trek 1100, reasonably stock 2002-ish Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo
    Posts
    4,172
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by C_LOGAN
    I would never ride bike with any carbon on it. I don't even trust aluminium - except my Mongoose Tetra SX Mountain bike which has thick tubing with big welds and reinforcements.
    Big welds and reinforcements may look comforting, but they're not really the issue here!

    Carbon fiber is VERY STRONG when done right. Aluminum is strong too (about as strong as steel per unit weight).

    The issues with CF and Al are their failure modes. Steel is pretty forgiving, it usually bends a lot before it breaks. Al and CF have been observed to fail in more catastrophic and sudden ways. Big welds and thick tubing may make a frame stronger in the first place, but it's doubtful that they'll affect how it ultimately fails. (I, for one, will ride just about anything )
    My bikes | Linux and Python stuff | Photo gallery

    Sheldon Brown, I miss you. Thanks for the advice, ideas, humor, and infectious enthusiasm for everything bikes...

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,523
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by C_LOGAN
    ...

    I would never ride bike with any carbon on it. I don't even trust aluminium - except my Mongoose Tetra SX Mountain bike which has thick tubing with big welds and reinforcements.
    Are there really stastically significant problems with the materials? Yes, we've all hear stories - or in my case, I've not actually heard stories, but heard "of" stories. But geeze, there's so many people using these components, are they dangerous on a statistically significant level? Especially aluminum, but carbon also.

  10. #10
    What? Carbon Based's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    1980s Pinarello Treviso
    Posts
    167
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm pretty sure now that it's just the top lamination. The weave below isn't dented or marked, so hopefully it'll be ok. I tried the "tap test", which didn't indicate any damage to the fork. I've heard this isn't so effective, though. Well, now I'll change the fork from an immediate task to long-term, when I decide to upgrade to a modern headset. I'll probably get a modern CF fork when I do replace it. Experience with automotive uses of carbon fiber makes me a little skeptical of the "carbon fiber is fragile and you will kill yourself if any part on your bike is made of it" crowd. Do agree about the failure modes, though. Thanks everyone

  11. #11
    Hammer Time C_LOGAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Australia
    My Bikes
    Paconi, Hillman, Sun Tourer + Mongoose Tetra SX
    Posts
    258
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by moxfyre
    Big welds and reinforcements may look comforting, but they're not really the issue here!

    Carbon fiber is VERY STRONG when done right. Aluminum is strong too (about as strong as steel per unit weight).

    The issues with CF and Al are their failure modes. Steel is pretty forgiving, it usually bends a lot before it breaks. Al and CF have been observed to fail in more catastrophic and sudden ways. Big welds and thick tubing may make a frame stronger in the first place, but it's doubtful that they'll affect how it ultimately fails. (I, for one, will ride just about anything )
    I know they are strong materials - I was referring to the failure mode when I said that you don't have to worry about steel forks snapping like twigs.

    I just don't like the idea that a bike can fail in an instant without any obvious signs.

  12. #12
    Hammer Time C_LOGAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Australia
    My Bikes
    Paconi, Hillman, Sun Tourer + Mongoose Tetra SX
    Posts
    258
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Camilo
    Are there really stastically significant problems with the materials? Yes, we've all hear stories - or in my case, I've not actually heard stories, but heard "of" stories. But geeze, there's so many people using these components, are they dangerous on a statistically significant level? Especially aluminum, but carbon also.
    It all comes down to what can happen. Carbon and Aluminium can fail in an instant, whilst steel fails over a longer time period with clear signs that a failure is occurring in most cases. This is what I have read and I would rather be safe than sorry..

    I would probably exceed the weight limit of any carbon fibre bike anyhow.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by moxfyre
    I, for one, will ride just about anything
    If it feels good to ride, I will ride most anything, also.

    Caruso

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •