Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-28-07, 10:09 PM   #1
exas
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
exas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
gear ratio question

is there a difference between say 40/20 and 60/30? is one easier to pedal than the others?
exas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 10:17 PM   #2
roadfix
hello
 
roadfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes:
Posts: 18,589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Difference in efficiency, if any, is probably insignificant, but your drivetrain components will last a little longer with the 60/30.
roadfix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 10:24 PM   #3
urbanknight
In beaurocratic limbo
 
urbanknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Bikes: Specialized Allez, K2 Razorback
Posts: 22,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've heard it said that larger gears are more efficient, but it's probably a minimal difference.
urbanknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-07, 06:45 AM   #4
cyqlist
Senior Member
 
cyqlist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Bikes: Mobiky, PBW, Jim Redcay, old Chicago Schwinns
Posts: 169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The smaller the cogs, the more the difference in efficiency and wear. The difference between 30/15 and 40/20 would be more than the difference between 40/20 and 60/30. Also higher stresses on the chain and cogs, and on the frame too with smaller cogs. When I set up the drivetrain on my PBW with Rohloff hub and 20" wheels I opted to go with 52/15 rather than 45/13 partly for these reasons (there is no 14 tooth cog for Rohloff).
cyqlist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-07, 02:07 PM   #5
exas
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
exas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
does someone have a definite answer here?
exas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-07, 02:14 PM   #6
caloso
Packfodding 3
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Bikes: Ridley Excalibur, Gazelle Champion Mondial, On-One Pompino, Specialized Rock Hopper
Posts: 34,105
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 246 Post(s)
According to Sheldon's gear calculator

60 x 30 = 52.6 gear inches
40 x 20 = 52.6 gear inches

Obviously the ratio is the same, 2x1, for each. There is a theory that the greater number of teeth spreads the wear and is mechanically more efficient. I don't doubt the theory but I think in practice, the difference would be too small to notice.
caloso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-07, 04:17 PM   #7
CdCf
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Posts: 3,208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The tighter the bend for the chain (i.e. the smaller the sprockets), the larger the angle each link has to rotate. Rotating any chain link means working against friction within the link, wasting energy. The less rotation, the less energy wasted, I would think.
CdCf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-07, 04:41 PM   #8
San Rensho 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,559
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
If you were blindfolded and pedalled one then the other (and didn't crash), there is absolutely no way you could tell if you were riding the 40 or the 60.

Efficiency would be based on which one has the most friction loss, I'm not going to speculate.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
San Rensho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-07, 07:20 PM   #9
rhenning
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,554
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
You bike will be heavier with the 60 as you need a longer chain to operate that gear set. Other than it is insignificant and almost impossible to measure the difference. Not even sure the weight would be measurable. Roger
rhenning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-07, 07:45 PM   #10
JanMM
rebmeM roineS
 
JanMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In Central IN
Bikes: RANS V3, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Posts: 13,519
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Wallet will be lighter with 60T versus 40T.
JanMM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:25 PM.