Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Tire Rotation

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Tire Rotation

Old 10-31-07, 07:09 AM
  #1  
Strob
Thread Starter
 
sjs731's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 77

Bikes: Trek 4300 and Redline D460 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tire Rotation

I just bought a Redline D460 29er and it has Maxxis Ignitor tires on it. There is a rotation arrow on them. The back tire is rotating the way the arrow points, the front is not. I have Panaracers on another bike and they have opposite rotation arrows for front and rear. My question: Is the Maxxis front supposed to follow the rotation arrow since there is nothing saying it should rotate opposite of the rear?
sjs731 is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 08:59 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
digger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Likely North of you.
Posts: 2,267
Mentioned: 213 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1295 Post(s)
Liked 157 Times in 132 Posts
Originally Posted by sjs731
I just bought a Redline D460 29er and it has Maxxis Ignitor tires on it. There is a rotation arrow on them. The back tire is rotating the way the arrow points, the front is not. I have Panaracers on another bike and they have opposite rotation arrows for front and rear. My question: Is the Maxxis front supposed to follow the rotation arrow since there is nothing saying it should rotate opposite of the rear?
In my experience the rotation arrow, regardless of front or rear, should follow the rotation of the wheels.

Just a question though, you're not looking at the arrow when it is near the ground hence pointing towards the REAR of the bike (not trying to say yer a dummy or anything)
digger is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 09:12 AM
  #3  
Strob
Thread Starter
 
sjs731's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 77

Bikes: Trek 4300 and Redline D460 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks. That's exactly what I thought myself. Just wanted another opinion. When the arrow is at the top it is pointing backwards. Just a factory mistake I guess. I'll take it off and turn it around.
sjs731 is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 09:26 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 68
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Obviously the "safe/proper" thing is to follow the manufacturer's directions.

However I wonder if tire rotation direction is a scientific fact or just another marketing gimmick? Any one have credible DATA (not anecdotes!) on tread life/traction/noise versus rotation direction?
bikingbrit is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 09:35 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,820
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times in 91 Posts
Originally Posted by bikingbrit
Obviously the "safe/proper" thing is to follow the manufacturer's directions.

However I wonder if tire rotation direction is a scientific fact or just another marketing gimmick? Any one have credible DATA (not anecdotes!) on tread life/traction/noise versus rotation direction?
WARNING-ANECDOTE! On cars and motorcycles, I've read that the reason for directional tires is because they are designed for maximum shedding of water in only one direction. Don't know about bicycles.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
San Rensho is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 09:39 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301

Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
One school of thought is for off-road use they should be exactly as your Redline came.

The idea is to provide maximum traction for acceleration in the rear and braking in the front, actions that occur in opposite directions.

I don't ride in the dirt anymore, but when I did we played with all sorts of tire combinations & configurations and I still crashed alot.
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...

Last edited by rmfnla; 10-31-07 at 10:07 AM.
rmfnla is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 10:05 AM
  #7  
Strob
Thread Starter
 
sjs731's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 77

Bikes: Trek 4300 and Redline D460 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Braking is why the Panaracers on my other bike specify a different rotation on the front than the rear. I have e-mailed Maxxis also and will post what I find out from them.
sjs731 is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 10:29 AM
  #8  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by bikingbrit
Obviously the "safe/proper" thing is to follow the manufacturer's directions.

However I wonder if tire rotation direction is a scientific fact or just another marketing gimmick? Any one have credible DATA (not anecdotes!) on tread life/traction/noise versus rotation direction?
It is scientific fact, check sheldobrown. Bicycles don't go fast enough to hydroplane so tread direction compared to motor vehciles will do nothing on pavement.

There is no water to shed thus direction is important. And if you're riding on pavement, even in rain the 100% slick tires will always give more grip. Tread is another marketing gimmick for tires that are supposed to be ridden on paved roads.
operator is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 10:35 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
digger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Likely North of you.
Posts: 2,267
Mentioned: 213 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1295 Post(s)
Liked 157 Times in 132 Posts
Originally Posted by San Rensho
WARNING-ANECDOTE! On cars and motorcycles, I've read that the reason for directional tires is because they are designed for maximum shedding of water in only one direction. Don't know about bicycles.
That's what I understand.....from what I have read when purchasing tires for my car.

On MY MTB bike I have Panaracer Smoke and Dart tires. The front has a tread pattern that is in the same direction of the tire and the rear has a tread pattern that runs laterally with the tire.

From what I have read, is that the front tire, when compressed on the ground, forces the tread to close together thereby...'pinching' the dirt in between the tread for better traction. Then as the tire rotates and the weight comes off that section of tire the tread or knobs open forcing out any mud. Also, it has side knobs for cornering that are supposed to do the same thing.

I think I read that on Sheldons website - https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tires.html#tread

The rear has a 'paddle' type tread or knobs to help push the bike forward.

On my commutter bike I have Tioga City Slickers which have a inverted tread pattern or triangular shaped lines or groves, these tires have a rotation arrow. One day I had the front tire on backwards (just had a flat and I was in a rush to get home) and had stopped off at the LBS. The mechanic noticed that I had the tire on backwards and said as much, as well as it would NOT shed the water as well, plus there is an aerodynamic drag with the....grooves in the tire pointing the wrong way.

My road bike tires have grooves that are about 0.25mm thick and they have rotation arrows. They are worn off the rear tire after about 500km.

I
Attached Images
digger is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 10:35 AM
  #10  
.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 3,981

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Comp, Soma ES

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not sure it really matters. I have some WTB Veloceraptors (sp) that have arrows going both ways. One way for dry, the other for muddy. Whatever..
__________________
Demented internet tail wagging imbicile.
knobster is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 11:01 AM
  #11  
Strob
Thread Starter
 
sjs731's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 77

Bikes: Trek 4300 and Redline D460 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have Panaracer Fire XC Pro tires on my other bike and they are same tread pattern front and rear but specifically show different rotation directions.
sjs731 is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 11:10 AM
  #12  
Boomer
 
maddmaxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,214

Bikes: Diamondback Clarity II frame homebuilt.

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16098 Post(s)
Liked 1,457 Times in 1,064 Posts
Some tires have rotation arrows, not for the direction of the tread but for the directions of the plys inside the tire. Proper flexing occurs in one direction, not the other.
maddmaxx is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 11:22 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
digger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Likely North of you.
Posts: 2,267
Mentioned: 213 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1295 Post(s)
Liked 157 Times in 132 Posts
Originally Posted by maddmaxx
Some tires have rotation arrows, not for the direction of the tread but for the directions of the plys inside the tire. Proper flexing occurs in one direction, not the other.
I guess then the consensus is - if the tire has a rotation arrow, mount it THAT way.
digger is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 11:30 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 68
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Per Jobst Brandt, tread direction is meaningful only for vehicles like farm tractors which sometimes spin their wheels in mud. Not cars, not motorcycles, not bicycles. See:

https://yarchive.net/bike/tire_directional_tread.html
bikingbrit is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 03:19 PM
  #15  
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925

Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Tread directionality is not the only reason that tires are directional. Some tires have an internal construction that likes to be flexed in a certain way.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers
DMF is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 07:38 PM
  #16  
Fossil
 
Lurch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 350

Bikes: Izip E3 Path Plus Step Thru , Raleigh Misceo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
My Bianchi commuter came with tires mounted with the rotation arrows correct on the rear and reversed on the front. The highest stress on a rear tire is from the driving force while that for the front is with braking. If there is any sort of construction or design asymmetry in a tire then reversing the arrows makes sense.
Lurch is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 08:10 PM
  #17  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by operator
It is scientific fact, check sheldobrown. Bicycles don't go fast enough to hydroplane so tread direction compared to motor vehciles will do nothing on pavement.

There is no water to shed thus direction is important. And if you're riding on pavement, even in rain the 100% slick tires will always give more grip. Tread is another marketing gimmick for tires that are supposed to be ridden on paved roads.
+1. Sheldon is spot on here.

In-house testing at Korbach lead Continental to conclude the same thing. There are tread patterns on road tires because consumers want them. They are purely decorative.

Construction and compounding - those make a difference.
Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 10-31-07, 08:26 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 89 Posts
I think the bottom line is that tread pattern doesn't matter for tires ridden on pavement, but it can matter for tires ridden off road. One way it matters for off road tires is that it can affect how well the tires shed mud and debris.

With that being said, I always go with the arrows, if there are any, road or mountain; but then again I line up the labels with the valve stems, too.

Last edited by well biked; 10-31-07 at 09:06 PM.
well biked is offline  
Old 11-02-07, 05:43 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
gmorris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 52

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD5, Gary Fisher Montare

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Actually, if you look at a set of high performance motorcycle tires, the tread pattern is opposite each other. That's because the primary forces applied to the front are from braking and the primary forces applied to the rear are from acceleration. Not that a motorcycle tire rated for 200+mph is comparable to a bicycle tire.
gmorris is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.