Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-31-07, 12:29 PM   #1
SanJoseBob
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Third Chainring on a Campy SR Crankset?

I have a Campy Super Record crankset and BB on my '81 Bruce Gordon light touring bike. I need lower gears than the 42 tooth lowest ring will give me, so am considering ading a third chainring. Can anyone suggest a suitable chainring and/or replacement spindle (or whole bottom bracket assembly) to do this addition? I'd like to keep the equipment in period if possible. Thanks!
SanJoseBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-07, 01:06 PM   #2
bikeaday
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've done this upgrade on a Shimano equip. bike before, I assume that it will be the same for Campy. Not only you will need to replace the BB for a longer one but also, you need to replace the front dérailleur for one design for triple and also the rear dérailleur with one with longer cage. This is an expen$$ive upgrade. Compact crankset could be a cheaper solution, a 50-36 or 50-34,.
bikeaday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-07, 01:23 PM   #3
forensicchemist
40 something and counting
 
forensicchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: dallas/ft.worth texas
Bikes: Colnago,Tsunami, Kestrel, Univega
Posts: 421
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If I understand your question, you currently have a double crank, and want to add a 3rd ring to that same crank? If so, it can be done. Its called the "tripilizer" Or you could just get a real triple crank, or as already mentioned, a compact double.

http://www.sheldonbrown.com/chainrings.html#135
forensicchemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-07, 02:51 PM   #4
rmfnla
Senior Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Posts: 5,928
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
If 3 teeth will do it for you Stronglight used to make a 39-tooth ring that fit those cranks.
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-07, 06:49 PM   #5
vpiuva
*
 
vpiuva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 3,458
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmfnla View Post
If 3 teeth will do it for you Stronglight used to make a 39-tooth ring that fit those cranks.
41 tooth is the smallest you can fit on the old 144bcd SR crank. Campy made some of those cranks as triples and I see them on eBay every now and then. Look at the catalogues on this
site to give you the spindle length required
vpiuva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-07, 08:33 PM   #6
LWaB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Auld Blighty
Bikes: Early Cannondale tandem, '99 S&S Frezoni Audax, '65 Moulton Stowaway, '52 Claud Butler, TSR30, Brompton
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Klein used to drill and tap SR crankarms to fit a third chainring. I don't know of a 144 triple conversion chainring but perhaps they exist.
LWaB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-07, 08:40 PM   #7
well biked 
biked well
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,070
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
There is such a thing as a "tripilizer" for the 144 BCD cranks as forensicchemist mentions above, at least there is for Nuovo Record cranks, which are 144 BCD. But the SR derailleurs likely don't have the capacity to handle a triple, so that's another thing to consider.

Last edited by well biked; 10-31-07 at 10:32 PM.
well biked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-07, 08:51 AM   #8
LWaB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Auld Blighty
Bikes: Early Cannondale tandem, '99 S&S Frezoni Audax, '65 Moulton Stowaway, '52 Claud Butler, TSR30, Brompton
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I should have scrolled up instead of down on that link...
LWaB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-07, 09:35 AM   #9
rmfnla
Senior Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Posts: 5,928
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vpiuva View Post
41 tooth is the smallest you can fit on the old 144bcd SR crank. Campy made some of those cranks as triples and I see them on eBay every now and then. Look at the catalogues on this
site to give you the spindle length required
Wrong.

I used to sell the Stronglight 39-T (144 bcd) rings in my shop. They were drilled out and looked cool, but most inportantly they gave you those last 3 teeth and they fit Campy NR & SR perfectly.
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-07, 03:18 PM   #10
SanJoseBob
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A 39 tooth chainring is what I'd prefer to install, and add a couple of larger freewheel sprockets. I guess I'll just keep my eyes open for old Stronglight cranks!

Thanks, everybody!
SanJoseBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-07, 03:23 PM   #11
LWaB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Auld Blighty
Bikes: Early Cannondale tandem, '99 S&S Frezoni Audax, '65 Moulton Stowaway, '52 Claud Butler, TSR30, Brompton
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Are you sure rmfnla?
39t x 25.4/2 = 495.3mm circumference/ PI = 157.7mm diameter

With a 144mm BCD, this gives 13.7mm total difference in diameter between the centre of the chain and the centre of the chainring bolts. Slightly less than 7mm difference in radius, I don't think this can work.

With 135mm BCD, the total difference is 22.7mm, giving just over 11mm radius difference, still quite tight.

Repeating the calcs with 41t and 144mm BCD gives 21.7mm total difference, which almost matches the difference of a 39t 135mm BCD chainring.

Last edited by LWaB; 11-01-07 at 03:28 PM.
LWaB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-07, 05:20 PM   #12
Grand Bois
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Bikes:
Posts: 16,626
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanJoseBob View Post
A 39 tooth chainring is what I'd prefer to install, and add a couple of larger freewheel sprockets. I guess I'll just keep my eyes open for old Stronglight cranks!

Thanks, everybody!
Watch eBay for a Stronlight 99 triple with drillium chainrings. They're not as finely finished as your SR crankset, but they're beautiful!

I'm thinking about doing the same thing with my PX10. it has a SR crank and NR derailers now. I want to swap the crank for a stronglight 99 triple and get a last generation Rally RD. The last generation Rally is really a long armed Victory and it's a superior derailer. The NR front derailer will work with a triple.

Last edited by Grand Bois; 11-01-07 at 05:32 PM.
Grand Bois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-07, 10:39 AM   #13
rmfnla
Senior Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Posts: 5,928
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LWaB View Post
Are you sure rmfnla?
39t x 25.4/2 = 495.3mm circumference/ PI = 157.7mm diameter

With a 144mm BCD, this gives 13.7mm total difference in diameter between the centre of the chain and the centre of the chainring bolts. Slightly less than 7mm difference in radius, I don't think this can work.

With 135mm BCD, the total difference is 22.7mm, giving just over 11mm radius difference, still quite tight.

Repeating the calcs with 41t and 144mm BCD gives 21.7mm total difference, which almost matches the difference of a 39t 135mm BCD chainring.
Pretty sure, but it's been years and as you know (or will find out) the memory will play tricks.
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:10 PM.