Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    A potato in every bite... seans_potato_business's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    My Bikes
    Pashley Princess Sovereign <3
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Proprietary bike chain?

    Recently my chain broke (when it comes off, I usually hook it partially on, and then rotate the peddles to make it go all the way on - I'm guessing this sideways pressure was beyond what it's designed to handle and led to it breaking - I didn't get to inspect it 'cause I had to run to catch the bus (right after my knee had jammed into the handlebar) and it was taken later). I note that a new chain on my old sprockets, causes the new chain to sort of ride up on the teeth of the sprocket and then jerk forward/backward (I can't remember exactly what happens). When I lined the old chain up against the new chain, I noticed that 10 links on the old chain was a shorter distance than 10 links on the new chain so I suspect this is the cause, rather than the chain-rings simply being worn. Unfortunately, I no longer have the old chain in my possession (I left it hanging over the pannier on my bike after it broke, and it had been removed when I went to inspect it the next day). So it seems, contrary to what Wikipedia says, there is no single standard size of chain (even if one is more common). The new chain that I bought was of the size 1/2 x 1/8. What do these numbers relate to (using a ruler, I can't match the dimensions to any of the numbers given. Can anyone advise where I can find a list of chain sizes smaller than this? I figure I can calculate the circumference of the sprocket and divide by the number of teeth to find the required size.

    I'm not sure if it makes a difference but the bike is a Batavus Cambridge with a SRAM Super-7 internal gear hub but I don't know the date of manufacture nor how to determine it.

    I don't really want to replace the sprockets because the front one is welded to the crank and I don't even know what misery the rear one has in store for me.
    Last edited by seans_potato_business; 11-17-07 at 08:42 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Spencer, IN
    My Bikes
    Trek 5200
    Posts
    689
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sdfgdgh View Post
    I note that a new chain on my old sprockets, causes the new chain to sort of ride up on the teeth of the sprocket and then jerk forward/backward (I can't remember exactly what happens).
    Your rear sprocket and possibly your chainring are worn out because you didn't replace your previous chain at the proper wear limit. Measuring your old chain is likely to yield some confusing numbers because it is worn. With a couple of rare exceptions, chains are standardized - you're just comparing an old chain with a new one.

  3. #3
    A potato in every bite... seans_potato_business's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    My Bikes
    Pashley Princess Sovereign <3
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, but the new chain has bigger links than the old one had, not the other way around. According to Sheldon Brown's website, the size of the links shouldn't even change - rather it's the wear on the inside of the chain that makes old links have more room inside. At least, that was my interpretation.

    I just measured that the front sprocket has about one tooth per .46 inches (1.18 cm) of circumference (measured from trough to trough).
    Last edited by seans_potato_business; 11-17-07 at 09:07 AM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Spencer, IN
    My Bikes
    Trek 5200
    Posts
    689
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You're probably replacing a 3/32" chain with your new 1/8" chain. Yes, the links look differently, but the tooth profile that they engage is the same. The 1/8" chain should work on your 3/32 sprocket and chainrings, but it may be a bit noisy.

    Edit: If the chain is riding up on the rear cog, you really should replace the cog, or you'll wear that new chain out pretty quick.
    Last edited by matthew_deaner; 11-17-07 at 09:14 AM.

  5. #5
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,161
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sdfgdgh View Post
    Yeah, but the new chain has bigger links than the old one had, not the other way around. According to Sheldon Brown's website, the size of the links shouldn't even change - rather it's the wear on the inside of the chain that makes old links have more room inside. At least, that was my interpretation.

    I just measured that the front sprocket has about one tooth per .46 inches (1.18 cm) of circumference (measured from trough to trough).
    You are completely right about the chain wear.

    I have never heard of a 1.18 cm pitch chain. I heard of 1 cm pitch chains - they're pretty impossible to find nowadays, but never heard of the kind you have.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    24,807
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops View Post
    You are completely right about the chain wear.

    I have never heard of a 1.18 cm pitch chain. I heard of 1 cm pitch chains - they're pretty impossible to find nowadays, but never heard of the kind you have.
    The OP's measurement, 1.18cm = .465", was only an approximation. It's really 1/2" pitch chain (1.27 cm) which is standard for all current bicycles.

  7. #7
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,298
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A new chain is longer than your worn chain? That doesn't make any sense to me. Can anyone think of a reason/situation where this would be true?
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,139
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by operator View Post
    A new chain is longer than your worn chain? That doesn't make any sense to me. Can anyone think of a reason/situation where this would be true?
    Some one doesn't know how to count the links and make it the right length and merely took it out of the box and tried to use it?

  9. #9
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,298
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dvs cycles View Post
    Some one doesn't know how to count the links and make it the right length and merely took it out of the box and tried to use it?
    lol Nice try, but the OP was measuring 10 links against 10 links.
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  10. #10
    Senior Member pat5319's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Spokane WA
    My Bikes
    Seven Axiom Ti, Trek 620, Klein Aura x, Masi cylocross (steel). Masi Souleville 8spd, Fat Chance Mtn (steel), Electra Amsterdam (Steel), Bianchi (Japanese) set up as "fixie", Scwinn Triple Bar cruiser,
    Posts
    1,123
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the difference in length comes form the wear on the brass bushings in the links. To make it easy to judge when to replace, Park (and others) makes a great measuring tool. Using a worn/stretched chain makes your cogs and rings wear quicker due to increased and uneven pressure fom th chain. If your parts are too worn you will have to buy new cassettes/freewheels and chainrings to avoid "skipping". Some say it's cheaper not to worry about it and let everything wear out 'till it doesn't wrk right and replace it all then. I don't suscribe to this theory myself, but it may have merit, as it depends on what you use, how you use it and the cost
    Pat5319


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •