speed factor
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
speed factor
Heelo, i would like to know how if the crankset size is the main factor for spped in a bike. Of course besides frame and componentes weigt. I mean , for example, two diffrent bicycles with the same weight , one with a crank 48 ad the other with a 52. Is the 52 going to be faster, or there are other factors? like I imagine frame design or the rear wheel number of speeds. How they interact with the crank?
best regards
best regards
#3
Making a kilometer blurry
Chainrings, cassette, and wheel size impact the the final drive ratio. For every rider, there is a comfortable cadence range (most fall into the 70-100 rpm range on flat ground). For different gearing combinations, that rpm range will produce a speed range. The strength of the rider determines how fast he or she goes. Certainly the chainring can be a limter on a steep climb or a long descent if it's too big or too small.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Sheldon Brown has a great tutorial on his web site that explains the inter-relationships among crank (chainring) size, rear cog size, wheel size and rider characteristics. Here is the link: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-theory.html
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Aerodynamics is a key factor in speed, for both bike and rider. As for gearing, you need a gear that will allow you to put out a maximum effort in a cadence range of about 90 to 105 for the length of the test. And, of course, lowest possible friction in all moving parts.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Davis CA
Posts: 3,959
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, '85 Giant road bike (unrecogizable fixed-gear conversion
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Gearing should fit the riders ability in order to maximize the power the rider is capable of producing. In other words, if I attempted a century on a bike with a 39/52 chained to a 11-21 cassette, I would have few gear choices in the flats without seriously crossing my chain or mashing and seriously lack a gear small enough to get me through the hills. Both of these things would affect efficiency, which in turn affects speed.
However, by using a 48/36/26 crankset and a 12-26 cassette, I have many more gear choices in the 17-19 mph range I generally ride when it's flat and calm, and some very easy gears for going up hills. Sure, there's no 53-11 combo to have me screaming down hills at 60mph, but I'm probably not capable of doing that anyway even if I had the gearing.
So for me, the touring setup is "faster" than the racer setup.
However, by using a 48/36/26 crankset and a 12-26 cassette, I have many more gear choices in the 17-19 mph range I generally ride when it's flat and calm, and some very easy gears for going up hills. Sure, there's no 53-11 combo to have me screaming down hills at 60mph, but I'm probably not capable of doing that anyway even if I had the gearing.
So for me, the touring setup is "faster" than the racer setup.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The number of speeds of the rear wheel and the size of the chain wheels have nothing to do with how fast a person can ride. It is the rider that decides. It has to do with mechanical advantage. Sure, a 52/11 is faster than a 48/13 in theory, but if I can't spin the cranks at the same cadence, then I won't be going faster. I will go about the same speed in reality.
I am only so strong and can't get any stronger because of mechanical advantage. I can only turn the rear wheel at x amount of revolutions. Whether this is done with a 52/11 or a 48/11. But, as mentioned above, if I try to use too high or too low of a gear ratio, I will tire more quickly and not go as fast over a longer distance. Sure, I can use the 52/11 to pedal and only have a small cadence, but I will tire my legs quickly and not be able to keep the speed up. But if I find a gear ratio where I can get the proper cadence for me, I can pedal at the speed for hours. The same is true for a gear ratio that is small.
If you are trying to get more speed, don't change the crankset or the cassette, change the rider. You need to train harder and properly. Unless you are constantly using the big/small already, then you do need a better gear ratio.
I am only so strong and can't get any stronger because of mechanical advantage. I can only turn the rear wheel at x amount of revolutions. Whether this is done with a 52/11 or a 48/11. But, as mentioned above, if I try to use too high or too low of a gear ratio, I will tire more quickly and not go as fast over a longer distance. Sure, I can use the 52/11 to pedal and only have a small cadence, but I will tire my legs quickly and not be able to keep the speed up. But if I find a gear ratio where I can get the proper cadence for me, I can pedal at the speed for hours. The same is true for a gear ratio that is small.
If you are trying to get more speed, don't change the crankset or the cassette, change the rider. You need to train harder and properly. Unless you are constantly using the big/small already, then you do need a better gear ratio.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for your answers, I am sort of new and I donīt know yet the differents sets of speeds and its capabilities. I am using a trek 7.3 for communting, this bike has a 48/38/28 and cassete 11-30 , 8 speed. I use the 38 with 1 0r 2 when I go for medium speed due to busy streets, traffic lights etc. But when I get an open long avenue or similar, I use the 48 with 1 or 2. Then feel like I could get more speed and stronger pedaling and the bike does not let me. So I guess I may need a bigger crank and a different cassete, waht would be a step further of what I have now?
best regards
best regards
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Heelo, i would like to know how if the crankset size is the main factor for spped in a bike. Of course besides frame and componentes weigt. I mean , for example, two diffrent bicycles with the same weight , one with a crank 48 ad the other with a 52. Is the 52 going to be faster, or there are other factors? like I imagine frame design or the rear wheel number of speeds. How they interact with the crank?
best regards
best regards
It's elementary, but not simple!
Road Fan
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Thanks for your answers, I am sort of new and I donīt know yet the differents sets of speeds and its capabilities. I am using a trek 7.3 for communting, this bike has a 48/38/28 and cassete 11-30 , 8 speed. I use the 38 with 1 0r 2 when I go for medium speed due to busy streets, traffic lights etc. But when I get an open long avenue or similar, I use the 48 with 1 or 2. Then feel like I could get more speed and stronger pedaling and the bike does not let me. So I guess I may need a bigger crank and a different cassete, waht would be a step further of what I have now?
best regards
best regards
So you are spinning out on the 48/11? First of all, you are a monster, that is a hard gear! If you are not spinning it out (i.e cadence around say 100 rpm in that gear), then you need more strength.
If your derailleurs have the capacity, you should be able to replace the big chainwheel with a 52, or replace the whole crank with maybe a 52/42/30.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Thanks for your answers, I am sort of new and I donīt know yet the differents sets of speeds and its capabilities. I am using a trek 7.3 for communting, this bike has a 48/38/28 and cassete 11-30 , 8 speed. I use the 38 with 1 0r 2 when I go for medium speed due to busy streets, traffic lights etc. But when I get an open long avenue or similar, I use the 48 with 1 or 2. Then feel like I could get more speed and stronger pedaling and the bike does not let me. So I guess I may need a bigger crank and a different cassete, waht would be a step further of what I have now?
What do you mean by 1 or 2? If those are the two larger cogs then try 3, 4, 5, etc for higher gearing.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have tried the sheldom brown gear calculatir and is pretty amazing , the only thing I donīt know how to calculate is the crank lenghts , from 150 mm to 190mm, I can seize mine, I will approximate the others
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The cassette has 8 cogs, with the smallest cog having 11 teeth and the largest cog having 30 teeth. The cranks usually have the size stamped on the back side of the cranks.
I have to agree with the above statement. I doubt you are pedaling fast enough, your cadence isn't high enough. Though it is not impossible for someone new to be going 35 mph, it is unlikely unless you are going down a steep hill. What is your cadence? Cadence is the rpm's of the cranks. People are different, but the most efficient is usually around 90-100. I actually like to spin a little faster, around 110-120.
Do you have a computer on your bike? How fast does it say you are going?
I have to agree with the above statement. I doubt you are pedaling fast enough, your cadence isn't high enough. Though it is not impossible for someone new to be going 35 mph, it is unlikely unless you are going down a steep hill. What is your cadence? Cadence is the rpm's of the cranks. People are different, but the most efficient is usually around 90-100. I actually like to spin a little faster, around 110-120.
Do you have a computer on your bike? How fast does it say you are going?
Last edited by SweetLou; 01-08-08 at 03:05 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 352
Bikes: BiknBrian brand custom 26 inch commuter trekker, Cannondale F600 Single Speeded MTB, Nashbar Cro-Mo CX, some other bikes and parts that could be made into bikes.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for your answers, I am sort of new and I donīt know yet the differents sets of speeds and its capabilities. I am using a trek 7.3 for communting, this bike has a 48/38/28 and cassete 11-30 , 8 speed. I use the 38 with 1 0r 2 when I go for medium speed due to busy streets, traffic lights etc. But when I get an open long avenue or similar, I use the 48 with 1 or 2. Then feel like I could get more speed and stronger pedaling and the bike does not let me. So I guess I may need a bigger crank and a different cassete, waht would be a step further of what I have now?
best regards
best regards
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I donīt have a computer in the bike, that can be a good improvement. I meant I use the 38 in the smallest and the second smallest position in the cassete and the same with the 48, then I fell I would like to have something a little faster
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Al
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Computers are nice, but not necessary. I use one that doesn't have cadence capabilities. I just count the revolutions for 30 seconds, then double. Now I don't do that, since I know the feel of my cadence if I am pedaling too fast or slow. You can have a friend drive next to you and see how fast you are going. Remember this and what gear you are in, check Sheldon Brown's Gear Calculator and determine your cadence. More work, but can be done.
If you really want to do the math, you could use gear inches and speed to determine your cadence.
If you really want to do the math, you could use gear inches and speed to determine your cadence.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Speed is determined by gear inches and cadence. To go faster, increase your cadence, unless you are already have a high cadence, then a bigger chain wheel is needed. Unless your cadence is higher than 100, you don't need to change your gear inches.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Computers are nice, but not necessary. I use one that doesn't have cadence capabilities. I just count the revolutions for 30 seconds, then double. Now I don't do that, since I know the feel of my cadence if I am pedaling too fast or slow. You can have a friend drive next to you and see how fast you are going. Remember this and what gear you are in, check Sheldon Brown's Gear Calculator and determine your cadence. More work, but can be done.
If you really want to do the math, you could use gear inches and speed to determine your cadence.
If you really want to do the math, you could use gear inches and speed to determine your cadence.
I'm sure that if I tried to calculate my cadence by counting rotations for 30 seconds by the time I've made the calculations my cadence will have changed up or down 5 to 10 rpm, maybe more.
Computers with cadence are very inexpensive, less than the cost of a new tire.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm sure a computer would be more accurate and could be helpful. If I was a racer, I would get one. With me, 110-115 is a natural cadence, one that I am happy with. I only started timing my cadence to see what I was doing. It's pretty flat here in Cleveland and every time I counted my cadence I was always within the 110-120 range.
But I could see a cadence computer being very helpful, especially for newer riders trying to find their sweet spot. All I was saying is that if the OP didn't have one there are other ways to get a rough idea of the cadence.
But I could see a cadence computer being very helpful, especially for newer riders trying to find their sweet spot. All I was saying is that if the OP didn't have one there are other ways to get a rough idea of the cadence.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the help, I did not know about the cadence factor and I will start measuring this.
[QUOTE=SweetLou;5947160]The cassette has 8 cogs, with the smallest cog having 11 teeth and the largest cog having 30 teeth.
So what is the difference with for example a 12-25, 10 speed in terms of performance? whatīs the meaning of the cogs having more or less teeth and the cassete more or less speeds.
Best regards
[QUOTE=SweetLou;5947160]The cassette has 8 cogs, with the smallest cog having 11 teeth and the largest cog having 30 teeth.
So what is the difference with for example a 12-25, 10 speed in terms of performance? whatīs the meaning of the cogs having more or less teeth and the cassete more or less speeds.
Best regards
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It has nothing to do with performance. Well, I guess it does in a way. It all has to do with gear inches. A 12-25 10 speed will have a much lower range of gear inches. Also, the difference between each cog will be less. What this means you can get a better choice of gear for your cadence. When in the 16 tooth cog, it might be too hard to keep up your cadence and when in the 18 tooth cog pedaling at your cadence is too easy. So, if you had a 17 tooth cog, it would be perfect.
So, you might think having a cassette with each cog one tooth more than the next is ideal. Not necessarily, if you live in a hilly area, you will need a larger range of gear inches. Maybe a 30 tooth cog to get up the hill and an 11 tooth cog so you can fly down the hill.
If you are a professional racer, you don't need such a range, because you have very powerful legs and can easily ride up a mountain in a smaller cog. So a shorter range of gear inches is preferred.
The speeds of the cassette or freewheel really don't matter that much. It is the overall range that matters. If you have a 6 speed freewheel and a 10 speed cassette, with each being a 12-27, then your range is the same. What will change is having more cogs so you can get a closer match for your abilities. With the 6 speed, you might have a gear that is a little too hard and the next size is a little too easy. But it isn't that big of a deal. I have a few bikes, with a freewheel with 6 speeds, cassettes of 7,8 and 9 speeds. The gear inch range is about the same on each bike and I can ride any just as well. No real difference in performance because of the drivetrain.
So, you might think having a cassette with each cog one tooth more than the next is ideal. Not necessarily, if you live in a hilly area, you will need a larger range of gear inches. Maybe a 30 tooth cog to get up the hill and an 11 tooth cog so you can fly down the hill.
If you are a professional racer, you don't need such a range, because you have very powerful legs and can easily ride up a mountain in a smaller cog. So a shorter range of gear inches is preferred.
The speeds of the cassette or freewheel really don't matter that much. It is the overall range that matters. If you have a 6 speed freewheel and a 10 speed cassette, with each being a 12-27, then your range is the same. What will change is having more cogs so you can get a closer match for your abilities. With the 6 speed, you might have a gear that is a little too hard and the next size is a little too easy. But it isn't that big of a deal. I have a few bikes, with a freewheel with 6 speeds, cassettes of 7,8 and 9 speeds. The gear inch range is about the same on each bike and I can ride any just as well. No real difference in performance because of the drivetrain.