Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Front Cassette?

  1. #1
    Bike4Peace Vernon Huffman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    on my bike
    My Bikes
    old Trek Single Track with a Bob trailer
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Front Cassette?

    Rear gear arrangements have evolved nicely. Why haven't we seen similar advances in front gear systems? One would think that narrow chains suitable for nine or ten speed rear cassettes would enable smooth, broad four or five speed gear clusters on the front. As a tourist with a heavy bike, trying to make the most of momentum on highway hills, I appreciate very broad options - from 28 X 34 on the uphill to 54 X 11 on the downhill. A smoother, broader front shifter would be a great thing. What are the obstacles to getting such an option to market?
    ---------------------------------------------+
    | __o CONTINENTAL CRITICAL MASS
    | _`\;,_ plan to ride from home
    | (*)/ (*) CONVERGE ON WASHINGTON, DC
    | 22 SEPT - World Car-Free Day
    |
    | b4p.bbnow.org/
    ---------------------------------------------+

  2. #2
    Your mom
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,546
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It already happened in the early 80s. See Sheldon

    But that's not really what you're talking about. I think it might be possible, but cross chaining would be a b*tch. I already hate adjusting triple front derailleurs; imagine quad or quint!

  3. #3
    Sometimes knows stuff. rmfnla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    La La Land (We love it!)
    My Bikes
    Gilmour road, Curtlo road
    Posts
    2,538
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In case you haven't noticed, bicycle people are usally tinkerers (after all, the Wright brothers ran a bicycle shop!).

    I am totally confident that this has been tried numerous times in numerous ways, and the only thing that kept it from coming to market is that it did not work better (or as well?) as what's already available.
    Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...

  4. #4
    slower than you Applehead57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    dairy country NY
    My Bikes
    Gunnar Road Sport, peugeot UO-10
    Posts
    652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's an interesting thought, but probably not practical.
    The width of the crank would likely be affect your stroke.
    And as with the rear cassette, it's not the number of gears you have, it's the range that matters.
    Finally, is there any gear we're missing that would be needed? We really have all the gears we can push.
    "Lack of opportunity does not constitute virtue". Diana Tickle.

  5. #5
    Bike4Peace Vernon Huffman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    on my bike
    My Bikes
    old Trek Single Track with a Bob trailer
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Front Cassette?

    I've been running 28-40-52 (or 28-38-52 on a bike with wide chain stay), which is as much as any front dérailleur I've found can handle. I'd like to go to a 54 to have a little higher downhill speed, but even if I can find a dérailleur that can span that, the jumps are too big to cross comfortably. My skinny chain fits in between my chain rings. Why not fill that space with a gear?

    Of course we don't need every combination of gears. Crossover positions are to be avoided anyway. A smooth shifting front cassette could make shifting smoother with very broad range.
    ---------------------------------------------+
    | __o CONTINENTAL CRITICAL MASS
    | _`\;,_ plan to ride from home
    | (*)/ (*) CONVERGE ON WASHINGTON, DC
    | 22 SEPT - World Car-Free Day
    |
    | b4p.bbnow.org/
    ---------------------------------------------+

  6. #6
    Senior Member teamcompi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Houston B.C.
    Posts
    271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Its funny you say that, check out the da Vinci web-site. Our tandem uses 4 cogs up-front which is more or less a cassette, works like it should and it provides enough gears with nice spacing especially on a tandem.

  7. #7
    bike rider jimmythefly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    My Bikes
    83 Trek 500, 2x 90s Novara Randonee, Zion 737, Specialized Rockhopper, Nishiki Colorado, Univega Specialissima
    Posts
    282
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Short answer: The cost of developing and marketing is greater than the expected demand/revenue for that product.

    Adding a fourth or fifth chainring at current spacing would either 1. Increase tread (Q-factor) 2. Require skinny or offset seat tube (tough sell with carbon bikes -and would likely not work with fatter tires).
    This is not desirable.

    Closer spaced chainrings would require a narrower cage on the front derailleur, which would increase the chances of getting chainrub from even slight cross-chaining. This is not desirable.

    Perhaps an arrangement could be made involving a new type of front derailleur. Except that the pros are already only using 2 chainrings, so a company would be spending money developing somethign that may be toughr to sell or require proprietary frame configurations that aren't racing-derived.
    This is undesirable.

    Why don't you get a Schlumpf 2-speed bottom bracket and combine that with a SRAM dual-drive hub? BAM! 120 gearing options! (2speed BB x 2 chainrings x 10s cassette x 3speed hub)

    PS if your skinny chain fits between your chainrihgs you've got a compatibility issue somewhere.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •