Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,226
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Deore crank help

    I saw these the other http://cgi.ebay.com/Shimano-FC-M569-...QQcmdZViewItem

    Do they use standard chainrings? Looks like the big ring uses some kind of proprietary rings.

    Tim
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  2. #2
    Has opinion, will express
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    12,806
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Holy mongroly... the outer ring is rivetted to the spider. This must be a collector's piece. The fact it came from a bike shop liquidation indicates it has been in the big ol' parts bin out the back for a long, long, long time.

    Undoubtedly, S Brown will know the history of this particular crankset... if not the guys in the Vintage and Classic forum.
    Dream. Dare. Do.

  3. #3
    Bicycle Repair Man !!! Sixty Fiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    YEG
    My Bikes
    See my sig...
    Posts
    26,103
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Damn... if that is original (and not some DIY job) it has to be some pretty early Deore stuff.

    I've never seen the likes of that but that is the nature of working on bikes...there are always surprises.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chili, NY
    My Bikes
    88 Fisher Gemini tandem, 92 Trek 970, 07 Nashbar Frame, 08 Gary Fisher Paragon
    Posts
    734
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Really Early MTB LX or XT stuff had 5 arms on the gears. This must have been early 4 arm stuff in the mid 90's I'd say. They made a few of these riveted wonders and they had WAY too many complaints when the chainrings wore out.

    Unless you can get a really good pic of the teeth, it's best to stay away from these.

    I shudder just thinking about these!

    Chris
    A Mess of old bikes...
    92 Trek 970
    08 Gary Fisher Paragon

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,595
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ang1sgt View Post
    Really Early MTB LX or XT stuff had 5 arms on the gears.
    In the late '80's and early '90's Shimano's MTB groups were Deore LX, DX and XT and all used 5-arm 110/74 mm BCD cranks. I have a DX crank on a '92 Trek 1420 and an LX crank on a '93 Trek 7000 and both are 110/74 with 5-arms. The riveted stuff at the time was the really low line (Acera?) and similar.

    This thing is really peculiar. Apparently the big ring is riveted to the spider but the middle and granny ring are bolted on.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Bill Kapaun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
    My Bikes
    86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
    Posts
    7,025
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    According to this site, they are 1997-98
    http://www.fa-technik.adfc.de/Herste...o/Gruppen.html

  7. #7
    Has opinion, will express
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    12,806
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
    This thing is really peculiar. Apparently the big ring is riveted to the spider but the middle and granny ring are bolted on.
    Maybe it's based on the design criteria that MTB riders spend most of their riding time in the middle and small chainrings, and so the larger ring, which is not so prone to wear because of less use and larger diameter could afford to be a permanent fixture by being rivetted on.
    Dream. Dare. Do.

  8. #8
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cs1 View Post
    I saw these the other http://cgi.ebay.com/Shimano-FC-M569-...QQcmdZViewItem

    Do they use standard chainrings? Looks like the big ring uses some kind of proprietary rings.

    Tim
    Don't buy those. "As-is", you can't tell from the pictures whether or not the crank holes are ****ed or not.
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  9. #9
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,226
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ang1sgt View Post
    Really Early MTB LX or XT stuff had 5 arms on the gears. This must have been early 4 arm stuff in the mid 90's I'd say. They made a few of these riveted wonders and they had WAY too many complaints when the chainrings wore out.

    Unless you can get a really good pic of the teeth, it's best to stay away from these.

    I shudder just thinking about these!

    Chris
    At first glance, I thought the big ring was bolted on not riveted. Does that mean the spider unbolts from the crank arms in order to change the big ring? Didn't Shimano have a similar system on 4 arm XTR cranks? Pictures I've seen of the XTR, early version, showed the big ring almost looking like it was part of the spider. I'm thinking Shimano is changing stuff just keep the aftermarket parts guys out of business.

    Tim
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,595
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just went back to the OP's picture link. If you look at the inside face of the crank, there seems to be a lockring that attaches the entire spider to the crank arm and allows removal of all three chainrings as a unit. So, in theory, it looks like you can replace the rings. Where you would get a replacement is another question.

  11. #11
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,226
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
    I just went back to the OP's picture link. If you look at the inside face of the crank, there seems to be a lockring that attaches the entire spider to the crank arm and allows removal of all three chainrings as a unit. So, in theory, it looks like you can replace the rings. Where you would get a replacement is another question.
    That's what I was thinking. And I thought Campy was proprietary! Shimano seems to be going in the same direction.

    Tim
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,595
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cs1 View Post
    That's what I was thinking. And I thought Campy was proprietary! Shimano seems to be going in the same direction.

    Tim
    I don't think this thing represents Shimano's future designs. I seems to be a one-time low cost model and is obsolete. Current Shimano MTB stuff is indeed proprietary in spider design and BCD but replacement chainrings are pretty widely available.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
    I just went back to the OP's picture link. If you look at the inside face of the crank, there seems to be a lockring that attaches the entire spider to the crank arm and allows removal of all three chainrings as a unit. So, in theory, it looks like you can replace the rings. Where you would get a replacement is another question.
    The real question is "What are you trying to accomplish?" If you can buy the whole crankset for less than the cost of replacement chainrings who cares?

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,595
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
    The real question is "What are you trying to accomplish?" If you can buy the whole crankset for less than the cost of replacement chainrings who cares?
    You can buy a lot of replacement cranks complete for less than the cost of a set of chainrings. This is particularly true if the crank is one generation behind the times. I've gotten brand new complete 105 8-speed and Ultegra 9-speed triple cranks for significantly less than just replacement chainrings would have cost because their new generation replacements had just come out.

    I believe the OP was just curious about the crank he saw offered on e-Bay and wondered how it was constructed. Thereafter, this thread went off on an academic discussion of its rather peculiar design features. I'm not sure anyone was seriously considering buying one.

  15. #15
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,226
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
    I believe the OP was just curious about the crank he saw offered on e-Bay and wondered how it was constructed. Thereafter, this thread went off on an academic discussion of its rather peculiar design features. I'm not sure anyone was seriously considering buying one.
    Hillrider, you must be reading my mind. I've never seen that design Shimano crank until lately. I personally prefer the old style 110 BCD five arm design. But then again I'm a dinosaur and like old stuff.

    Tim
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •