Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Senior Member thehammerdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NJ
    My Bikes
    Road bike is a Bianchi C2C, Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & 1980's Grandis
    Posts
    1,960
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Compact Vs. Regular chain rings

    I just got me a sweet new road bike but it has horribly small chain rings...Compact stuff I am use to riding Huge Rings 53 X 42. Will this screw up my ride? I have yet to ride it do to weather..Can I just go to regular sized rings? Help..

  2. #2
    Low car diet JiveTurkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Corvallis, OR, USA
    My Bikes
    2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.
    Posts
    2,402
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    With a given cassette, the difference between a compact and standard double will be that for each gear combo, the compact will be a little lower gear.

    Give it a try and see how you like it. You can compare the setup you are used to to the current setup here: http://sheldonbrown.com/gears/. You may find the compact crank with an 11-23T cassette gives you about the same (or better) range with the benefit of overall lower weight.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As a general rule of thumb 3 teeth in the front is about the same difference in gear inches as 1 tooth in the rear. So approximately 50/17 should be about the same as 53/18 as an example. It's actually 79.4 inches versus 79.5

    Ultimately you end up running one cog higher at the rear and thats about the only difference.

    --brett

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •