Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Bill
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO
    My Bikes
    Specialized Globe Sport, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro
    Posts
    630
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Steering Column length question

    Park's Big Blue Book on page 185 states "For steel and aluminum steering columns, do not exceed 40mm between the stem and headset."

    My question is: Does anyone know the rational for Parks 40mm spacing maximum?

    On my bike build my headset-to-stem height is closer to 80mm as can be seen in the picture. I purposely left the column uncut until I found out more about fit. I'm resonably comfortable with the handlebar height but would more likely go for higher than lower if I did decide to change and do it by a bar or stem change as I can't afford Parks 'cut-it-longer' tool or their 'column stretcher' tool. Having just come across the Park statement, I am trying to understand the why so I can make an intelligent decision. Anyone have insight on this? Thanks for any input.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Eventually you will reach a point when you stop lying about your age and start bragging about it. - Will Rogers

  2. #2
    Senior Member barba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,083
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It places a great deal of stress on the steerer tube. Failure would be the concern, and it would no doubt cause a nasty crash.

    If you need that many spacer and a high rise stem your frame is probably the wrong size for you.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    25,596
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree 40 mm seems rather restrictive for a steel or Al steerer, even a 1" one, considering Easton allows 50 mm with a 1-1/8" all-carbon steerer.

    However the height you show plus an up-angled stem says, as baba noted, the frame is significantly too small for you. That much rise should never be needed.

  4. #4
    Pwnerer Wordbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Pagosa Springs, CO, USA
    My Bikes
    Road, MTB, Cruiser, Chopper, BMX
    Posts
    2,879
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by barba View Post
    It places a great deal of stress on the steerer tube. Failure would be the concern, and it would no doubt cause a nasty crash.

    If you need that many spacer and a high rise stem your frame is probably the wrong size for you.
    +1

    In a few cases with very large riders I've had to search our vendors for very tall stems, especially when a stock-sized frame isn't quite enough.

    I can see that the OP is using an adjustable stem, my guess is for more bar height. My preference is to use a riser bar rather than overextending the steerer for those looking for more bar height. With the fight between riders wanting lighter bikes and thinner steerer tubes, there's not much material there left to support the bars, especially when extended past 40mm. Also, using relatively weak carbon spacers adds nothing for support.

    Look into a tall city bar, or perhaps a comfort bike if you still feel you are uncomfortable.
    Quote Originally Posted by ahsposo View Post
    Ski, bike and wish I was gay.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •