Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Benefits of Threadless Headsets?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Benefits of Threadless Headsets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-08, 04:50 PM
  #26  
Boomer
 
maddmaxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,214

Bikes: Diamondback Clarity II frame homebuilt.

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16098 Post(s)
Liked 1,457 Times in 1,064 Posts
Originally Posted by aesmith
OK, I think I see ... Just a personal view, but I wouldn't want the stem angled up (or down!), but it could be done.

Actually, its not really have a like-for-like choice. More just one thing to take into account when choosing between for example Yates (level top tube, threaded fork) or Thorn (sloping top tube, threadless fork). From what you guys say, there may be benefits in threadless. Threaded has the advantage that the maker can cut the fork to exact length without compromising my choice of bar height. I suppose I would learn to love the look if the frame and bike was right.
Typically they are much lighter as no steel is involved, just aluminium.........as is the steerer tube on a modern threadless fork unless you opt for the carbon steerer tube (sounds like not what you would want).

To optain a level stem you opt fot the 17deg variety. This when coupled with the more or less typical 73deg head tube angle results in level. If turned over, such a stem would be angled up at 34deg.

If not absolutely sure about the handlebar height, the steerer tube can be cut a little long with spacers below the stem and even above it. Move the bar height up or down by moving spacers from top to bottom or bottom to top untill test rides are done. Now the steerer can be cut again or you can leave it that way.
__________________
maddmaxx is offline  
Old 03-04-08, 05:22 PM
  #27  
cat person
 
GlassWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N.W. Michigan
Posts: 510

Bikes: Nashbar Race SIS (1987), Kestrel Talon (2007), Trek Fuel EX 9.5 (2007)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
like this:

GlassWolf is offline  
Old 03-04-08, 06:12 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 912

Bikes: A bunch

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Threadless really are the way to go if you are building a bike that will have S&S couplers and will be meant to be packed for travel. Dropping out the fork is a lot simpler with a threadless headset and requires only an Allen wrench as opposed to a standard threaded headset wrench, which is large and heavy and not suited to travel.
CHenry is offline  
Old 03-04-08, 10:52 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 619
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
GlassWolf, this is a little OT, but what model handlebars are those? The shape is very nice.
relyt is offline  
Old 03-04-08, 11:13 PM
  #30  
hello
 
roadfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 18,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 193 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 52 Posts
For me, it all boils down to aesthetics. Generally speaking, if I were building up a frame with a 1" headtube, I'd go threaded. With larger head tube diameters, threadless.
Pros and cons between threaded/threadless and quill/threadless stems don't even concern me as I can easily work with both systems.
roadfix is offline  
Old 03-05-08, 10:43 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
aesmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 162

Bikes: Dawes road bike and Trek Antelope 850

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I guess I'll get used to the look in time. It still says "Ruffty-Tuffty mountain bike" to me, rather than light road bike. 17 degree angle makes sense, keep the stem horizontal.

There's a spacer above the stem in that picture, is there?
aesmith is offline  
Old 03-05-08, 12:23 PM
  #32  
cat person
 
GlassWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N.W. Michigan
Posts: 510

Bikes: Nashbar Race SIS (1987), Kestrel Talon (2007), Trek Fuel EX 9.5 (2007)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by relyt
GlassWolf, this is a little OT, but what model handlebars are those? The shape is very nice.
I snagged that image from another thread. I think one about handle bar tape if I recall, in the general cycling, or roadie forum. I'm not sure which bars those are, but you could search forums for the image path/name. it should pop up the thread. I just copy/pasted the image link the OP used in the thread because the look of that setup made me drool. haha
GlassWolf is offline  
Old 03-05-08, 02:15 PM
  #33  
Commuter Animal
 
mike_khad1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cold Spring, NY
Posts: 104

Bikes: 2006 Burley Hudson, 2008 Specialized Globe

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My understanding of the advantage of threadless: only one tool needed to adjust (Y-Hex), can allow fine adjustment of bike to person - by changing stems to adjust length and or angle.
mike_khad1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.