Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Derailleur age

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tyler, TX
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Derailleur age

    I'm looking for thoughts regarding the purchase of a used bike when it comes to component age - particularly derailleurs but also any other components I should be aware of. I have seen comments similar to the following: a new Shimano 105 is as good or better than the Ultegra line from a couple years ago.

    Is this statement true? Is there a place I can compare specs/performance of component models from different years?

    I've been shopping many used bikes on CL and Ebay. For an example to this topic, I'm looking at a 2006 Specialized Roubaix with Ultegra components and ~1600 miles on it. If I was to buy new, the 2008 Roubaix Elite uses 105s instead. Have design advances made the 105s of today technically as good or better than the 2 year old Ultegras or am I in better shape with the higher line of components of 2 years ago that have not been heavily used?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    9,146
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Derailleurs are probably the longest life component on a bike. Are you sure you need new? They are also more cross-compatible than most components.

    I think that 10-speed 105 components are better than 9-speed Ultegra, and 10-speed Ultegra are better than 9-speed Dura-Ace, just my opinion.

    Al

  3. #3
    biked well well biked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,842
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nate98 View Post
    I'm looking for thoughts regarding the purchase of a used bike when it comes to component age - particularly derailleurs but also any other components I should be aware of. I have seen comments similar to the following: a new Shimano 105 is as good or better than the Ultegra line from a couple years ago.

    Is this statement true? Is there a place I can compare specs/performance of component models from different years?

    I've been shopping many used bikes on CL and Ebay. For an example to this topic, I'm looking at a 2006 Specialized Roubaix with Ultegra components and ~1600 miles on it. If I was to buy new, the 2008 Roubaix Elite uses 105s instead. Have design advances made the 105s of today technically as good or better than the 2 year old Ultegras or am I in better shape with the higher line of components of 2 years ago that have not been heavily used?

    Thanks.
    If you're looking at similar bikes within a certain price range, comparing used to new, I'd go with the new bike because you'll get a full factory warranty on everything-

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    My Bikes
    Bridgestone '90 RB-1, Giant TCR Alloy, 90's mountain bikes galore.
    Posts
    137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is a great site that archives bikes: http://bikepedia.com/QuickBike/Default.aspx

    I agree that rear derailleurs are built to last.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •