Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Sumanitu taka owaci LittleBigMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    8,945
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    No, you can't do that (Beatles)

    Just liked the Beatles' song touch. It echoed in my hollow skull...

    Anyway, I know manufacturers try to protect themselves, but when they say, "no, you can't mix parts," are they always right? I realize some things are just incompatible, but a few years back (?) my integrated brake/shifters went totally south, and I didn't have the money to replace them. I was not about to stop riding, so I had to figure something out.

    I bought a very old Schwinn Super Sport from a thrift shop for $15 and cannibalized the old-fashioned friction shifters from it. I've been using them ever since on my Trek 1200 road bike.

    In many ways I actually like them better than the original equipment for several reasons:

    1) Seemed like I was always adjusting them, they had to be so precise to work properly. But the Schwinn shifters are very forgiving about that. The derailleurs have to be way out of adjustment before I have a problem, due to the fact that any slack is taken up by slight changes in shift lever position.

    2) Shifting put more stress on the cables due to the jerking motion of the derailleurs (mainly front,) causing me to go through cables more often on my triple. But the Schwinn shifters are smooth and gentle, and it seems I don't have to replace cables as often.

    3) Changing a cable was a real pain, the adjustments took me forever and it seemed I never got it quite right. But the Schwinn shifters seem to let me throw on a cable and go, almost no adjustment.

    Any thoughts, advice?
    No worries

  2. #2
    JRA...
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    philly
    My Bikes
    trek 520 & 736, DeRosa Professional, Fuji Professional, Raleigh International 3-speed, Saronni (any info people?), Humber 3-speed, Raleigh Sports, Carlton Grand Prix coming soon!
    Posts
    839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm not the hugest fan of stem shifters, but if they work and you're happy with the setup, more power to ya. Indexed/integrated shifters are nice, but they're also touchy, and Shimano's total lack of parts support for them is extremely aggrevating. Integration and groups are more about marketing than manufacturers covering their rear.

  3. #3
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ever wonder why some of the best touring bikes sold today are still equipped with bar-end friction shifters...?
    .cinelli.olympic.surly.long.haul.trucker.kona.ku.surly.steamroller.
    .litespeed.classic.litespeed.firenze.bianchi.pista.dean.colonel.plus.more.

  4. #4
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    15,005
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by The Fixer
    Ever wonder why some of the best touring bikes sold today are still equipped with bar-end friction shifters...?
    I did not know this very welcome bit of information. I suppose the list is very short and esoteric and includes Rivendell. I love nonindexed ratcheted SunTour barcons for commuting and cyclocross.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  5. #5
    ld-cyclist prestonjb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    380
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Barcons on touring bikes?

    1 reason... BArcons were easier to use than DTS.

    In this modern age of STI there is not much reason to use either barcon or DTS unless you:

    1) Are a tri-geek and need the barcons on your aero-bars
    2) A retro geek
    3) can't read installation manuals and install STI correctly.

    P.S. Never broke a shifter cable ever in my life even on my DTS. Never heard such a wierd story about breaking a cable because of undue stress caused by the shifters.

    Sounds like cheap cables or improper setup and originator if thread already admits to not being able to install cables correctly...

    Also some of the STI parts are avail... then again I've never had an STI break either... And I'm about to chaulk up 10,000 miles this year on them!

  6. #6
    Year-round cyclist
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Montréal (Québec)
    Posts
    3,023
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not only Rivendell bicycles, but also the Trek 520 and Bruce Gordon bicycles use bar-end shifters... which, by the way, work in indexed mode (their default) as well as friction.

    Amongst their advantages:
    - the front works in friction, but with a light touch, so you can fine-tune the derailleur position and use almost any ring you want;
    - simpler to maintain, especially in snow, mud...

    Ergo (from Campagnolo) also shifts the front derailleur in friction -- or quasi-friction.


    As far as quickness of use, it's personal. I find that STI and Ergo are easier from the hoods, but bar-ends are easier to use from the drops. And since I ride from the drops...

    Regards,
    Michel Gagnon
    Montréal (Québec, Canada)

  7. #7
    Senior Member Don Cook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Memphis TN
    My Bikes
    Raleigh, Benotto, Schwinn, Trek
    Posts
    816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by prestonjb
    Barcons on touring bikes?

    1 reason... BArcons were easier to use than DTS.

    In this modern age of STI there is not much reason to use either barcon or DTS unless you:

    1) Are a tri-geek and need the barcons on your aero-bars
    2) A retro geek
    3) can't read installation manuals and install STI correctly.

    P.S. Never broke a shifter cable ever in my life even on my DTS. Never heard such a wierd story about breaking a cable because of undue stress caused by the shifters.

    Sounds like cheap cables or improper setup and originator if thread already admits to not being able to install cables correctly...

    Also some of the STI parts are avail... then again I've never had an STI break either... And I'm about to chaulk up 10,000 miles this year on them!
    You demonstrate a rather narrow view but yet a wide gap in knowledge.

  8. #8
    Forum Admin lotek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    n.w. superdrome
    My Bikes
    1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa
    Posts
    17,633
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Pre Ergo/Sti you COULD do that. didn't matter who
    built what, it all worked together.
    LBM, somewhere in the thread the shifters evolved to
    Stem shifters, is this correct?
    Alot of older racers (1970s era) used barcons and
    still do, most reasons stated very aptly by mgagnonlv.
    I do agree that out of adjustment derailleur is easier to
    compensate for with friction shifting, sure it may be a
    bit slower but try feathering a indexed shift.
    just my .02 worth.
    Marty
    Sono più lento di quel che sembra.
    Odio la gente, tutti.

    Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
    Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.

  9. #9
    Sumanitu taka owaci LittleBigMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    8,945
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by prestonjb
    In this modern age of STI there is not much reason to use either barcon or DTS unless you:

    1) Are a tri-geek and need the barcons on your aero-bars
    2) A retro geek
    3) can't read installation manuals and install STI correctly.
    Just refer to me as a, "geek-geek."

    No worries

  10. #10
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    15,005
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    friction mode

    As I have mentioned in the past, front derailleur indexing, such as in RapidFire or STI, is a significant engineering blunder and a major frustration for anyone who values being able to fine-tune the cage position over the chain and to modulate the shift action to reduce the chance of an overshift. Rear indexing is fine for those who like it, but I have never seen any real advantage to it.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •