Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-18-08, 04:05 PM   #1
Paco97
Allegheny Mtns of WV
Thread Starter
 
Paco97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hampshire County, West Virginia
Bikes: Giant Cypress
Posts: 310
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Double to Compact Double

Is it possible? Does it invovle a lot of switching parts or is it simply a matter of a new chain and new chainrings.
Paco97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08, 04:14 PM   #2
tedshuck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Centennial, CO
Bikes: Lynskey 210R, Cannondale CAAD2 MTB
Posts: 128
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You will need to replace the crank to go from a regular (53,39) double to a compact (50,34) double. The bolt circle of standard cranks is too large to fit the smaller inner chainring of a compact crank. You should not need to change the chain, since it should only need to be shortened. You will need to move the front derailer to line up with the smaller chainrings of the compact crank.
tedshuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08, 04:20 PM   #3
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Posts: 9,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Going from a standard double to a compact double requires a new crankset (110 BCD= compact) and matching bottom bracket. Front derailleur will need to be adjusted and in some cases the rear derailleur will need to be replaced depending on the chainwrap capacity needed for the particular crankset and cassette if you plan to run a wide ratios.
I would consider a 50-36 compact instead of the more common 50-34 to avoid wide ratios in the front, that is if the 34 would give you low enough gearing. Or a 48-34 compact would give you overall lower gearing and closer ratios but there could be problems getting the front derailleur low enough if it is a braze-on type.

Al
Al1943 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 PM.