Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Difference between Ultegra 6603 & 6604-G cranksets

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Difference between Ultegra 6603 & 6604-G cranksets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-08, 11:20 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jamaica Plain, MA
Posts: 7

Bikes: Trek 1400, Trek 5200 (1st gen.), Litespeed Vortex

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Difference between Ultegra 6603 & 6604-G cranksets

I was checking them out on Colorado Cyclist: https://tinyurl.com/6yqbze

Nothing more that a weight difference and finish, right?

Is the 6604 compatible with an Ultegra 6600 BB?

Also, this is for a hill climb bike project and I intend to run just a 24t up front with regular 10-spd in the rear. I assume a typical short-cage 10spd Dura-Ace derailleur will be fine?

Thanks in advance,
-Steve
sgatzos is offline  
Old 06-20-08, 11:44 AM
  #2  
Low car diet
 
JiveTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Corvallis, OR, USA
Posts: 2,407

Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I believe the 6604-G is a part of the relatively new Ultegra SL line--a half-step up from Ultegra to Dura Ace. There's information on bikeforums and elsewhere about how SL compares to regular Ultegra.

As for compatibility, I imagine they are all compatible--though I'm not certain. Look on https://www.shimano.com.

Sounds like you intend to run a triple crankset with just the inner ring at 24T? I'd be concerned about the cross-chaining between the chainring and smaller cogs. I'd be inclined to go for an older system like aquare-taper, ISIS, or Octalink, so you can swap in a longer axle and move the crank out a bit resulting in the chainring better centered relative to the cassette.

Edit: on second thought, the system may be OK. I just checked my road bike with 2-piece triple crank and 10-speed cassette. The inner chainring lines up pretty well with the 4th largest (lowest) cog, so it's not too far off from center and maybe you'll be using the larger cogs more for climbing anyway.

Last edited by JiveTurkey; 06-20-08 at 11:50 AM.
JiveTurkey is offline  
Old 06-20-08, 12:06 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jamaica Plain, MA
Posts: 7

Bikes: Trek 1400, Trek 5200 (1st gen.), Litespeed Vortex

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Great, thanks.

I know that a longer-cage rear derailleur would be necessary if all three chainrings would be used, but is it still necessary for a single-ring up front?
sgatzos is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.