Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-05-08, 10:50 AM   #1
gholt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Layton, UT
Bikes: 2004 Giant OCR, 2002 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2008 Trek 6500 Disc
Posts: 686
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Are Compack and regular crank arms the same

This may be a dumb question, but are the crank arms on the compact and the regular the same?

What I mean is could one just buy the chain rings for the compact double and replace the rings on a regular chain ring, or does one need to buy a new crank and bottom bracket?
gholt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-08, 11:04 AM   #2
reverborama
Broom Wagon Fodder
 
reverborama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: Fuji Supreme; Kona Wo; Nashbar road frame custom build; Schwinn Varsity; Nishiki International; Schwinn Premis, Falcon Merckx
Posts: 1,232
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Yes. The "Compact" aspect refers to the large difference in toothcount on the chainrings rather than the dimensions of the arms. A standard road setup is going to be something like 39-53 or maybe 39-50. A compact will be more like 34-50 which give you a gear range more like a triple crank without the extra chainring. Arms will be usually be something like 165, 170, 172.5, 175 just like in a standard road double.
reverborama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-08, 11:21 AM   #3
gholt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Layton, UT
Bikes: 2004 Giant OCR, 2002 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2008 Trek 6500 Disc
Posts: 686
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So, can I just buy the the chainrings for the 50 & 34 instead of buying another crank?

The current one I have is an ultegra 6500 with a 53 / 39.
gholt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-08, 11:31 AM   #4
Little Darwin
The Improbable Bulk
 
Little Darwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Bikes: Many
Posts: 8,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
No.

A modern road chainring usually has a Bolt Circle Diameter (BCD) of 130 mm and a compact crank has a BCD of 110.

With a BCD of 130 (which your Ultegra probably has), the smallest possible chainring is 38 teeth.

This site gives you some information on the subject:

http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/chainrings.html
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA

People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Little Darwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-08, 11:34 AM   #5
gholt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Layton, UT
Bikes: 2004 Giant OCR, 2002 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2008 Trek 6500 Disc
Posts: 686
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
OK, Thanks, I will look into getting a compact double crank. With mostly shimano parts, am I limited to purchasing a ultegra crank, or can I buy another brand?
gholt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-08, 11:42 AM   #6
Little Darwin
The Improbable Bulk
 
Little Darwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Bikes: Many
Posts: 8,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I don't know the 6500, but is it Octalink? You are limited to matching the bottom bracket for sure... or you need to change bottom bracket too.

Of course, if you are changing the crank, the extra cost of a bottom bracket shouldn't be a deal breaker.

You could do a search in this forum to find some recommendations or warnings about specific compact cranks.
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA

People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Little Darwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-08, 02:29 PM   #7
Bill Kapaun
Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
Posts: 9,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
Just to add-
"Mountain" type crank sets in the 24/28-xx-44/48 tooth range are also typically 110MM BCD.
Bill Kapaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-08, 02:44 PM   #8
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,920
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 96 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Darwin View Post
I don't know the 6500, but is it Octalink? You are limited to matching the bottom bracket for sure... or you need to change bottom bracket too.
Yes, the FC-6500/6503 cranks are Octalinks. Current Shimano compact cranks are all Hollowtech II, AFAIK and aren't usable with any square taper of Octalink bottom bracket so a new bb is a must.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-08, 02:51 PM   #9
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,920
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 96 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun View Post
Just to add-
"Mountain" type crank sets in the 24/28-xx-44/48 tooth range are also typically 110MM BCD.
That was true years ago but current "Mountain" cranks are nearly all 94/58 mm BCD and use even smaller chainrings.

There are still some "Treking" cranks with 110/74 bcd available. Nashbar offers one pretty cheap ($70) and it uses an ISIS bottom bracket. Here is their listing:

http://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?c...0Road%20Cranks
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-08, 10:02 PM   #10
reverborama
Broom Wagon Fodder
 
reverborama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: Fuji Supreme; Kona Wo; Nashbar road frame custom build; Schwinn Varsity; Nishiki International; Schwinn Premis, Falcon Merckx
Posts: 1,232
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
You may need to look at your front derailleur as well. Some will only handle a difference of 13 teeth between the large and small chainring.

What's your real problem? Is the crank bad and you need to replace it, or do you just want a wider range of gears? The easier and cheaper answer might be to change your cassette. If you have an 11-25, your rear derailleur can easily handle 11-27. It might even go to 28 in a pinch (though probably no higher). 39x27 might be low enough to suit you and it would be a LOT less expensive than changing the crank.
reverborama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-08, 11:18 PM   #11
well biked 
biked well
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,088
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
.....but current "Mountain" cranks are nearly all 94/58 mm BCD....
104/64mm BCD is the current, common size for mtb's-
well biked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-08, 07:08 AM   #12
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,920
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 96 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by well biked View Post
104/64mm BCD is the current, common size for mtb's-
Oh yeah, I was thinking of the 5-arm type that followed the 110/75 5-arm cranks. The new ones are 4-arm and have the bcd you show. Things change fast.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-08, 08:47 AM   #13
gholt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Layton, UT
Bikes: 2004 Giant OCR, 2002 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2008 Trek 6500 Disc
Posts: 686
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
There isn't anything wrong with the current crank. I was just looking for more capability to get up some the big hills here. The cassette is 12 / 26. So, I will do a search among the different compact cranks to see if there is any to avoid.
gholt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-08, 11:58 AM   #14
DMF 
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Posts: 6,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Get the best of both worlds and get a triple crank. That conversion is a little more expensive if you have to replace the derailleurs (some report not having to), but the result will be worth it.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers
DMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-08, 12:21 PM   #15
Metaluna
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Bikes: Gunnar Sport, Soma Double Cross Disc
Posts: 914
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMF View Post
Get the best of both worlds and get a triple crank. That conversion is a little more expensive if you have to replace the derailleurs (some report not having to), but the result will be worth it.
He might also have to replace the left STI lever. I believe for Shimano they are designed to be double or triple-specific.
Metaluna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-08, 12:24 PM   #16
gholt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Layton, UT
Bikes: 2004 Giant OCR, 2002 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2008 Trek 6500 Disc
Posts: 686
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I already replaced the shifter with the 105 ST-5500. So, it may be better to look at the triple crank instead of the compact double.

How do you find out if the derailurers are compatable with a triple?
gholt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-08, 12:58 PM   #17
DMF 
Elitist Troglodyte
 
DMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Posts: 6,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The part number mostly. The RD should be a long (actually medium) cage version, and the triple FD has a wider and deeper cage.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

- Will Rogers
DMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 PM.