Best solution for lower gearing on older road bike
#1
Surf Bum
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 2,184
Bikes: Lapierre Pulsium 500 FdJ, Ritchey breakaway cyclocross, vintage trek mtb.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Best solution for lower gearing on older road bike
Current setup: 1985 Trek 600, Shimano 600 cranks and deraillers, 52-40 chainrings with 14-28 Suntour 6-speed freewheel. This gives me a lowest gear of 38.6. I'd like to get that down quite a bit for the massive hills around here.
What sounds like the best idea to you guys? From easiest to hardest:
1) Change the current small chainring to a 38 (I think that's the smallest possible with the 130 bcd spacing). This would get me down to 36.6.
2) Change the freewheel to one with a bigger cog and hope the rear derailler will still shift to it ok. 40-32 would be 33.8, 40-34 would be 31.2, 38-32 would be 32.1, and 38-34 would be 30.2. Do you think the derailler would shift a gap from 24 to 34 like those shimano "megarange" freewheels? Or would I need to stick with 24 to 28 to 34 jump freewhel?
3) Find a Willow Triplizer chainring so I can run an additional granny chainring on my current cranks. Still need to change bottom bracket. The Willow doesn't seem to be available anymore, but FSA makes a similar chainring (130 bcd to 74 bcd). Any problem with this new fsa chainring (made for 8,9,10 speed chains) and old 6-speed era chain?
4) Change bottom bracket and crankset to a "triple" (Did Shimano make a 600 series triple?). Any suggestions on an appropriate crankset and bottom bracket?
Clearly #3 and #4 would allow any sort of "bail out" granny gearing I wanted (with at most a front derailler swap but I think the regular 600 would work ok on a triple since i'd only use the granny on the inner two cogs.
Of course there is a 5th option: HTFU and just mash that damn 40-28 up the 19% grade like I was 20 years younger.
What sounds like the best idea to you guys? From easiest to hardest:
1) Change the current small chainring to a 38 (I think that's the smallest possible with the 130 bcd spacing). This would get me down to 36.6.
2) Change the freewheel to one with a bigger cog and hope the rear derailler will still shift to it ok. 40-32 would be 33.8, 40-34 would be 31.2, 38-32 would be 32.1, and 38-34 would be 30.2. Do you think the derailler would shift a gap from 24 to 34 like those shimano "megarange" freewheels? Or would I need to stick with 24 to 28 to 34 jump freewhel?
3) Find a Willow Triplizer chainring so I can run an additional granny chainring on my current cranks. Still need to change bottom bracket. The Willow doesn't seem to be available anymore, but FSA makes a similar chainring (130 bcd to 74 bcd). Any problem with this new fsa chainring (made for 8,9,10 speed chains) and old 6-speed era chain?
4) Change bottom bracket and crankset to a "triple" (Did Shimano make a 600 series triple?). Any suggestions on an appropriate crankset and bottom bracket?
Clearly #3 and #4 would allow any sort of "bail out" granny gearing I wanted (with at most a front derailler swap but I think the regular 600 would work ok on a triple since i'd only use the granny on the inner two cogs.
Of course there is a 5th option: HTFU and just mash that damn 40-28 up the 19% grade like I was 20 years younger.
#2
Senior Moment
I don't have an answer for you, but I will be watching this thread closely, because I am in the same boat. My 28 year old Univega has the same gearing, and all the roads around my house are very hilly. I definitely need some granny gearing to help get my tired old carcass up those hills.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,053
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Find a junked mountain bike and transfer the triple crank and the long cage RD and the FD. Stick on a mega freewheel 34-11 and if things work out you wont even have to get a new BB. You will have to use friction mode for your shifters. Oh and you may need to redish the rear wheel.
I just got through doing this to a diamond back road bike. I do love the lower gears.
I just got through doing this to a diamond back road bike. I do love the lower gears.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 166
Bikes: 85 Fuso, 86 Peloton, 84,88 Paramount
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I had one of those bikes for a while - nice bike. How about finding a Sugino crank with 110 bcd and setting it up with a 50/34 double. It should fit on the Shimano BB and it would drop your low gear to about 32. The only problem might be the rear derailleur might not have the capacity to handle 30T.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times
in
48 Posts
I had a early Shimano 600 with a 40X28 as the lowest gear. I changed it out for a 38X30 and it worked fine. A 40X32 should work as well, and even a 38X32 might work.
FWIW I had a suntour 40X28 that I switched to a 34X28. The 34 to 52 shift was hard to make, but otherwise it was OK. That makes me think a 40X34 would have worked, but I never tried it.
If you need lower gears than that, you are in for a new crank and derailer.
em
FWIW I had a suntour 40X28 that I switched to a 34X28. The 34 to 52 shift was hard to make, but otherwise it was OK. That makes me think a 40X34 would have worked, but I never tried it.
If you need lower gears than that, you are in for a new crank and derailer.
em
#7
Surf Bum
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 2,184
Bikes: Lapierre Pulsium 500 FdJ, Ritchey breakaway cyclocross, vintage trek mtb.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Ah, yet more ideas. Thanks guys. I do have an old mountain bike here with a shimano triple that i could put on as a test fit - it has 165 crank arms though so i wouldn't want to use it in the end (i'm 6' tall), but it'd be good for a test.
Changing front cranks to sugino or something with a 110 bcd is a great idea. If the 34 to 52 chainring jump is hard, I wouldn't mind swapping out my 52 for even a 48. If I can drop the rear cog to 13, it'd be nearly the same ratio as my current 52/14 anyway.
Well, now I have something to think about instead of work tomorrow, ha!
Changing front cranks to sugino or something with a 110 bcd is a great idea. If the 34 to 52 chainring jump is hard, I wouldn't mind swapping out my 52 for even a 48. If I can drop the rear cog to 13, it'd be nearly the same ratio as my current 52/14 anyway.
Well, now I have something to think about instead of work tomorrow, ha!
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
Current setup: 1985 Trek 600, Shimano 600 cranks and deraillers, 52-40 chainrings with 14-28 Suntour 6-speed freewheel. This gives me a lowest gear of 38.6. I'd like to get that down quite a bit for the massive hills around here.
What sounds like the best idea to you guys? From easiest to hardest:
1) Change the current small chainring to a 38 (I think that's the smallest possible with the 130 bcd spacing). This would get me down to 36.6.
2) Change the freewheel to one with a bigger cog and hope the rear derailler will still shift to it ok. 40-32 would be 33.8, 40-34 would be 31.2, 38-32 would be 32.1, and 38-34 would be 30.2. Do you think the derailler would shift a gap from 24 to 34 like those shimano "megarange" freewheels? Or would I need to stick with 24 to 28 to 34 jump freewhel?
3) Find a Willow Triplizer chainring so I can run an additional granny chainring on my current cranks. Still need to change bottom bracket. The Willow doesn't seem to be available anymore, but FSA makes a similar chainring (130 bcd to 74 bcd). Any problem with this new fsa chainring (made for 8,9,10 speed chains) and old 6-speed era chain?
4) Change bottom bracket and crankset to a "triple" (Did Shimano make a 600 series triple?). Any suggestions on an appropriate crankset and bottom bracket?
Clearly #3 and #4 would allow any sort of "bail out" granny gearing I wanted (with at most a front derailler swap but I think the regular 600 would work ok on a triple since i'd only use the granny on the inner two cogs.
Of course there is a 5th option: HTFU and just mash that damn 40-28 up the 19% grade like I was 20 years younger.
What sounds like the best idea to you guys? From easiest to hardest:
1) Change the current small chainring to a 38 (I think that's the smallest possible with the 130 bcd spacing). This would get me down to 36.6.
2) Change the freewheel to one with a bigger cog and hope the rear derailler will still shift to it ok. 40-32 would be 33.8, 40-34 would be 31.2, 38-32 would be 32.1, and 38-34 would be 30.2. Do you think the derailler would shift a gap from 24 to 34 like those shimano "megarange" freewheels? Or would I need to stick with 24 to 28 to 34 jump freewhel?
3) Find a Willow Triplizer chainring so I can run an additional granny chainring on my current cranks. Still need to change bottom bracket. The Willow doesn't seem to be available anymore, but FSA makes a similar chainring (130 bcd to 74 bcd). Any problem with this new fsa chainring (made for 8,9,10 speed chains) and old 6-speed era chain?
4) Change bottom bracket and crankset to a "triple" (Did Shimano make a 600 series triple?). Any suggestions on an appropriate crankset and bottom bracket?
Clearly #3 and #4 would allow any sort of "bail out" granny gearing I wanted (with at most a front derailler swap but I think the regular 600 would work ok on a triple since i'd only use the granny on the inner two cogs.
Of course there is a 5th option: HTFU and just mash that damn 40-28 up the 19% grade like I was 20 years younger.
Don't trash your knees.
That's about as low a gear set as you can get without going compact or triple. The 600 in front is pretty good, but might not handle a true wide-range triple, say 52/40/24. The MTB parts will (I think), and the Campy Racing Triple system will.
#9
practically invincible.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Englander
Posts: 221
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ha, we have the opposite problem. I'm *looking* for a triple with 165 crank arms. What model is it?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 650
Bikes: 2 Centurian Ironman, Rossin Genisis, Greenspeed GT3, Stowaway (wife)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have just gone thru the same thing. I am now running a mtb crankset and my old 5 speed 14-24 and it works great. I did have to change the rd and the fd and since my old bike already had down tube friction shifters I was good to go. I did have to get a longer 4mm screw for rd large cog stop. It had too much tavel for my road 5 speed.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
Any bike shop that's been in business for a long time should have a old Suguino, SR, Sun Tour, etc. 110/74 crank lying around either gently used from an upgraded bike or NOS. It would be contemporary with your bike, low in cost and work as well as what you have now. It won't have the newer pinned and ramped chainrings but you don't have them now. A suitable Shimano cartridge bottom bracket will work with any of them.
Another possibility is to find a left-over 8-speed 105 triple crank as these were 130/74 and would take a 26 or 24T granny substituted for the 30T OEM ring. These do shift much better than the earlier designs, even with friction shifters. However, they require a 7/8-speed width chain.
Another possibility is to find a left-over 8-speed 105 triple crank as these were 130/74 and would take a 26 or 24T granny substituted for the 30T OEM ring. These do shift much better than the earlier designs, even with friction shifters. However, they require a 7/8-speed width chain.
#12
cycles per second
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930
Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
48 Posts
I used an old 110/74 BCD MTB triple as compact double for my 1986 road bike (was 42-53). I didn't even need to change the bottom bracket. I did get new rings and went with 34-50. I also got some loose cogs for the freewheel from www.loosescrews.com and rebuilt it as a 13-30 (was 13-21).
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087
Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times
in
166 Posts
Switch the crank out for a compact double. 50/34
#14
just keep riding
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560
Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
22 Posts
What I did was get a Sugino XD600 crank with 26-36-48 rings. An older MTB or touring crank would also work. You can probably keep the front derailleur, but you may need a long cage rear to take up all the chain.With your current 14-28 freewheel, youll have a low of 25 gear inches and a high of 93. You could switch to a 7 speed freewheel with no modifications needed if you are using friction shifting. A 13-24 would give you a 29 to 100 gear inch range.
#15
Surf Bum
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 2,184
Bikes: Lapierre Pulsium 500 FdJ, Ritchey breakaway cyclocross, vintage trek mtb.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Quick question: Would a campy chorus triple crankset work? it says it has square taper. Hmm... would i need a different bottom bracket than the current one used by the shimano 600 double? since it's for a ten speed rear, does that mean the chainrings are narrower and not suitable for the chain i'm running for my old 6-speed rear or a replacement 7-speed freewheel?
Last edited by pacificaslim; 09-15-08 at 06:30 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 98
Bikes: 1987 Marinoni ; 1994 Miyata 621; 1973 Raleigh Superbe
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Or.....you could just buy another bike. No, seriously! I'd recommend something from the early 90s. There are plenty of good used bikes to be had with triples and indexed bar-end shifters for around 200-300. You can easily spend about half as much much money upgrading the drivetrain on your trek (which already has a very nice drivetrain....just no good for big hills).
So my recommendation: either sell the Trek and buy a different bike for, net, the same money as upgrading the Trek, or just expand the stable (clearly the better option)!
Cheers,
Allan Pollock
So my recommendation: either sell the Trek and buy a different bike for, net, the same money as upgrading the Trek, or just expand the stable (clearly the better option)!
Cheers,
Allan Pollock
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,218
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#18
Useful Idiot
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Butler, OH
Posts: 25
Bikes: Giant RS940, Schwinn Sports Tourer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would stick with a double crankset so you can use the original bottom bracket without messing up the chainline. On my late 80s Giant I went from a 52-42 to a 48-32 and still used the original derailleur, doing something similar with your bike would be the easiest and cheapest option.
#19
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
Another option is to replace the larger chain ring with a 48 that's drilled for both 130 and 110; then you can get a smaller inner ring.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,866
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
Quick question: Would a campy chorus triple crankset work? it says it has square taper. Hmm... would i need a different bottom bracket than the current one used by the shimano 600 double? since it's for a ten speed rear, does that mean the chainrings are narrower and not suitable for the chain i'm running for my old 6-speed rear or a replacement 7-speed freewheel?
Campy and Shimano shared the square drive shape, but the tapers are different, and won't in general fit right. You really should get a suitable Campy BB or Phil Woods to fit it correctly.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: yreka, ca
Posts: 542
Bikes: like 15. my favorite a 1951 schwinn spitfire cruiser. also have a 1959 amf roadmaster, 1962 jch deluxe cruiser among others.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
if you can, go to the tripple chainrings, longer crank axle and wide range front deraillur solution. i've done like 6 of these double to tripple ring conversions on both 1 and 3pc crank set ups. a wider range freewheel with like a 32 or 34tooth low gear would help if you rear deraillur can handle the larger low gear cog. if it's an 85, it can use an updated drive train.
#22
Senior Moment
I found the solution to my gearing issues, I bought a used 7 speed freewheel with 11-34 sprockets. I didn't think my derailleur would work with the big jump to the 34, but it works fine, so I didn't need to switch out the derailleur.
I was going to put on a triple crankset, but I definitely would have had to buy a new front derailleur, and also I was afraid that i would have problems with alignment. So I got out of it pretty cheap.
Going from a 28 on my old freewheel to a 34 on the new one, I should be able to tackle any of the steep hills around here with ease.
I was going to put on a triple crankset, but I definitely would have had to buy a new front derailleur, and also I was afraid that i would have problems with alignment. So I got out of it pretty cheap.
Going from a 28 on my old freewheel to a 34 on the new one, I should be able to tackle any of the steep hills around here with ease.