Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-10-08, 05:21 PM   #1
wrk101
DRF aka Thrifty Bill
Thread Starter
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The NC Mountains
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue, 87 Cimarron, 14 frame school custom, 73 Paramount
Posts: 19,975
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Asymmetrical BB Spindle Sugino RT

I didn't pay close enough attention on the dismantle of my 1984 Lotus, with a Sugino RT bottom bracket and crankset. The spindle is asymmetrical, longer on one side than the other. I am thinking the shorter side is the driven, chainring side. Can someone verify?

Next time, I will pay closer attention...
wrk101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-08, 06:24 PM   #2
I_bRAD
Call me The Breeze
 
I_bRAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Corbyville Ontario
Bikes: 2004 Litespeed Siena, 1996 Litespeed Obed, 1992 Miele (unknown model), 1982 Meile Uno LS.
Posts: 3,699
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Usually, if there is any text on the spindle it goes so you could read it from the top looking toward the front of the bike. Worst case put it together and it'll be obvious quickly. You have a 50% chance of getting it right the first try.
I_bRAD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-08, 06:25 PM   #3
sfclearwater
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 207
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
On the older cranks I have taken apart the long end is the drive side. I remember this because a quick way to improve chainline in a single speed conversion is to flip the spindle.
sfclearwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-08, 07:18 PM   #4
wrk101
DRF aka Thrifty Bill
Thread Starter
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The NC Mountains
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue, 87 Cimarron, 14 frame school custom, 73 Paramount
Posts: 19,975
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
There is writing on the spindle, so I will check it and see if the drive side is the long side.

thanks!

bill
wrk101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-08, 07:49 PM   #5
Panthers007
Great State of Varmint
 
Panthers007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Bikes:
Posts: 7,479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Every one I've ever dealt with has the longer side on the right - the drive side. If you think about this logically, you'll see why this should be.
Panthers007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-08, 08:18 PM   #6
Deanster04
Senior Member
 
Deanster04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Bikes: Cinelli Supercoursa 69, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Mondonico Diamond Extra 05, Coors Light Greg Lemond (built by Scapin) 88, Scapin MTB, Stumpjumper 83, Specialized Stumpjumper M4, Lemond Poprad 2001
Posts: 1,366
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfclearwater View Post
On the older cranks I have taken apart the long end is the drive side. I remember this because a quick way to improve chainline in a single speed conversion is to flip the spindle.
I just pulled apart a Siguno BB on my 1983 stumpjumper. I agree the long side should be on the drive side in all cases.
Deanster04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-08, 08:33 PM   #7
vettefrc2000
Senior Member
 
vettefrc2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere North of Detroit and moving fast!
Bikes: 1976 Fuji America 1980 Fuji America 1984 Fuji America TS V 1982 Fuji Royale II 1993 Trek 970 1997 Trek 5000 2004 Trek Calypso 2007 Trek Portland 2008 Surly LTH
Posts: 696
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrk101 View Post
I am thinking the shorter side is the driven, chainring side.
...

How can you possibly come to that conclusion?
vettefrc2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-08, 09:40 PM   #8
wrk101
DRF aka Thrifty Bill
Thread Starter
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The NC Mountains
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue, 87 Cimarron, 14 frame school custom, 73 Paramount
Posts: 19,975
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Its the way I had the pieces laying on the work bench. When I take something apart, I usually place them in reverse order on the bench, as I remove them. So they were in the order that would dictate that position if you follow me. But I did not mark it in any way, and did not carefully lay it out. So I wanted to check, rather than put it back together twice. Check twice, install once kind of thing.

Reassembly is tomorrow (framesaver went in today). So the timeliness of the replies is very appreciated.

thanks!
wrk101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-08, 11:46 AM   #9
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 29,113
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
I know most cup-and-cone bottom brackets install with the longer end of the spindle toward the drive-side but I have come across one exception.

I have a '93 Trek 7000 MTB with a bonded Al frame and LX components. When I first overhauled it and took out the bottom bracket I was surprised to find the bb spindle had been installed "backwards", i.e. longer end to the nds. After grousing about factory incompetence, I reinstalled it the "correct" way.

Wrong. Installed with the long end of the spindle toward the drive side, the chainrings were way too far outboard and the nds crank arm hit the chainstay. Apparently the super fat stays on this frame required a long spindle and reverse installation to clear everything and keep the proper chainline.

I've since replaced the cup-and-cone bb with a Shimano cartridge but it required a 127.5 mm spindle and the nds crankarm now clears the chainstay only by about 3mm.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-08, 12:41 PM   #10
JoeF45
Want to ride more!
 
JoeF45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: South of Seattle, in the rain
Bikes: Marin for dirt, Cannondale for road
Posts: 82
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Drive side longer

Folks;

I did a repair job on a Sugino AP BB on my '86 C-dale and the asymetrical spindle was longer on the drive side.

JF
JoeF45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:41 AM.