Changing from Mega-Exo to Octalink- Good or Bad
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Changing from Mega-Exo to Octalink- Good or Bad
I just purchased a compact double crankset that requires an octalink bottom bracket. right now i have a mega-exo bottom bracket. Is it a bad idea to change to the octalink? what are the pros and cons of changing to the octalink?
thanks
thanks
#4
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
I never liked how the crankset attached to the Octalink. It didn't seem as secure as the old square taper style. Seems over-engineered to me.
Just a personal opinion of course.
Just a personal opinion of course.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gainesville/Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,343
Bikes: Trek 1000, two mtbs and working on a fixie for commuting.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gainesville/Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,343
Bikes: Trek 1000, two mtbs and working on a fixie for commuting.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pro: swapping bbs will be cheaper than swapping cranks for most price points.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
Octalink was a fine system and I don't see any great advantages in going to megaexo other than it helped manufactures sell new stuff. You won't loose any functionality in going to Octalink. The only disadvantage I can think of is that you will need a matching BB and when you do this take note that there is an octalink version 1 and a version 2 and from memory they are compatible one way but not the other. Make sure you know what you need before buying an octalink BB.
Anthony
Anthony
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gainesville/Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,343
Bikes: Trek 1000, two mtbs and working on a fixie for commuting.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was under the impression that v1 was "road" and v2 was "mtb" or vice-versa.
Sheldon Brown has a good write-up on this, but I am too lazy too look it up. I believe the real differences concern the depth of the splines.
Sheldon Brown has a good write-up on this, but I am too lazy too look it up. I believe the real differences concern the depth of the splines.
#10
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,115
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 656 Times
in
370 Posts
Dan
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
Thats it. Different spline length. From memory you can use a long splined BB with a short splined crank but NOT the other way around.
Anthony
Anthony
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gainesville/Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,343
Bikes: Trek 1000, two mtbs and working on a fixie for commuting.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ok, I just checked Sheldon Brown, it is definitely the spline depth/length that is different and IT IS NOT road v. mtb.
It is more high end v. low end: DA, Ultegra, 105 and XTR use(d) v1 (short) and Deore, XT, LX, Sora, and Tiagra for v2 (long).
He did not mention of any cross-compatibilities.
It is more high end v. low end: DA, Ultegra, 105 and XTR use(d) v1 (short) and Deore, XT, LX, Sora, and Tiagra for v2 (long).
He did not mention of any cross-compatibilities.
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thanks for all the replies, just wanted to make sure i wasnt swapping to something they may not be as good as what i have, from what i have read the octalink stuff is good, i think i will go ahead and swap.
again thanks.
again thanks.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Backwoods of Ontario
Posts: 2,152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
What no-one has come out and said out-right is that if you want to use the crankset, you've got to use a BB with the matching interface, it simply won't fit on anything else. Also, as mentioned above, there are two versions of Octalink spline, know which you have before ordering a BB.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 511
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I hate, hate, hate, square taper!!!!!
On the bad side, people have reported that the smaller bearing size tends to lead to premature bottom bracket failure. But at 280#, I never had to replace an Octalink bottom bracket for cross country use.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
89 Posts
Some ISIS bottom brackets, particularly the early ones, were an entirely different story.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Lots of opinions, very few facts. I wonder how many posters here have actually worked with both systems..?
I have, and I have issues with the Mega Exo design. The off side (non-drive) bearing does not seat against the bottom bracket shell, it tightens up against an alloy sleeve that you slide into the shell of the drive side bearing assembly.
There is a rubber O-ring that goes under the off-side bearing to fill up some of the space, but the bearing never tightens against the frame, just this sleeve.
FSA did this to ensure that there would always be the correct spacing betwen the bearings regardless of BB shell variations but the result is the off-side bearing loosens up easily and requires constant attention.
FWIW, I have Octalink on several of my bikes and have yet to have a problem with any of them.
I have, and I have issues with the Mega Exo design. The off side (non-drive) bearing does not seat against the bottom bracket shell, it tightens up against an alloy sleeve that you slide into the shell of the drive side bearing assembly.
There is a rubber O-ring that goes under the off-side bearing to fill up some of the space, but the bearing never tightens against the frame, just this sleeve.
FSA did this to ensure that there would always be the correct spacing betwen the bearings regardless of BB shell variations but the result is the off-side bearing loosens up easily and requires constant attention.
FWIW, I have Octalink on several of my bikes and have yet to have a problem with any of them.
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,880
Bikes: Lemond, Gios, Fuji, Trek, too many to write
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I stripped an Octalink once. But the strip was in the left crank, not the spindle. The spindle is quite strong. I just replaced it with cheapo Ritchey crank and its been going well ever since.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
I've had very good service from two different Octalink bottom brackets used with Ultegra cranks. They have been durable and long lasting and both are still in service after thousands of miles.
The splined bottom bracket design, which includes both Octalink and ISIS, got a bad name from some of the cheap and/or poorly made ISIS bb's which failed early and often. Octalink does not have that weakness.
That said, Octalink is now obsolete and Shimano's only current sealed V-1 bottom bracket is the 105 level BB-5500 which is available in both double (109.5 mm) and triple (118.5 mm) widths. The Dura Ace (BB-7700) double Octalink is still listed by Licktons but it is not a sealed unit and requires routine maintainence.
The splined bottom bracket design, which includes both Octalink and ISIS, got a bad name from some of the cheap and/or poorly made ISIS bb's which failed early and often. Octalink does not have that weakness.
That said, Octalink is now obsolete and Shimano's only current sealed V-1 bottom bracket is the 105 level BB-5500 which is available in both double (109.5 mm) and triple (118.5 mm) widths. The Dura Ace (BB-7700) double Octalink is still listed by Licktons but it is not a sealed unit and requires routine maintainence.
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That said, Octalink is now obsolete and Shimano's only current sealed V-1 bottom bracket is the 105 level BB-5500 which is available in both double (109.5 mm) and triple (118.5 mm) widths. The Dura Ace (BB-7700) double Octalink is still listed by Licktons but it is not a sealed unit and requires routine maintainence.
All ,
again thanks for all the info, i appreciate it.
Hillrider, How often do the non sealed units require mainatenance? thanks
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
Frankly, the Dura Ace's only benefit is its lighter weight. Unless you are an extreme weight weenie, get the BB-5500 or try to find an NOS Ultegra level BB-6500.
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That depends heavily on your riding conditions. If you ride in dry, clean conditions, probably annually is enough. If you ride in rain, snow, sand, etc., etc., a lot more often.
Frankly, the Dura Ace's only benefit is its lighter weight. Unless you are an extreme weight weenie, get the BB-5500 or try to find an NOS Ultegra level BB-6500.
Frankly, the Dura Ace's only benefit is its lighter weight. Unless you are an extreme weight weenie, get the BB-5500 or try to find an NOS Ultegra level BB-6500.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That depends heavily on your riding conditions. If you ride in dry, clean conditions, probably annually is enough. If you ride in rain, snow, sand, etc., etc., a lot more often.
Frankly, the Dura Ace's only benefit is its lighter weight. Unless you are an extreme weight weenie, get the BB-5500 or try to find an NOS Ultegra level BB-6500.
Frankly, the Dura Ace's only benefit is its lighter weight. Unless you are an extreme weight weenie, get the BB-5500 or try to find an NOS Ultegra level BB-6500.
I replaced it with BB-6500 and never needed service in another 15k + miles and went with the bicycle when it was sold... everything else on the bicycle was Dura Ace.
We use the XTR Octalink BBs on our tandem. They replace XT level square BBs. We certainly prefer Octalink to out previous XT square BBs. Tandem now has over 100K miles.
I looked at the Mega-Exo and was not impressed with the design or implementation.
If you get the correct Octalink BB and mating Octalink crank set, I think you will be good for many years and many 10's of thousands of miles (or kms).
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gainesville/Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,343
Bikes: Trek 1000, two mtbs and working on a fixie for commuting.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think Octalink feels better than square, but I've not gotten to the point where I can compare longevity or whatever.