Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    620
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Derailer Questions

    HI,
    I ve noticed that many of the Higher end Bikes Come with the Dura Ace Componets,are the Numbers related to release date or models, I ve seen 7700's,7800's, and the new 7900-ss
    Are the 105's almost as good as the Dura ace , and where does the Ultegra components fit in this mix.
    Rather confused about what it all means.
    Doug

  2. #2
    Older than dirt CCrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Winchester, VA
    My Bikes
    Too darn many.. latest count is 11
    Posts
    5,345
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In order, bad to good:
    A050
    2200
    Sora
    Tiagra
    105
    Ultegra
    Dura Ace

    The 7700/7800/7900 are series, not really year of release. As Shimano improves they'll increment the series or part #. a 465 hub may become a 466 and so on.

    Regards, and Happy Holidays!
    Roger

  3. #3
    I have senior moments... bikinfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Woodside, CA
    My Bikes
    Many
    Posts
    2,153
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Further to what Ccrew said (although I wouldn't use the phrase bad to good particularly, maybe adequate to top of the line). The SS stands for a short cage, GS would be for a medium cage, SGS is for a long cage...

    A great place to determine stuff about Shimano group spec is techdocs.shimano.com
    suum quique
    Mountain bikes: Santa Cruz Hecklers (99, 02, 07), Santa Cruz Nomad, Moots YBB, Trek OCLV Pro Issue, American Breezer
    Road bikes: TST, Trek 2300 (Carbon/Alum)

  4. #4
    Older than dirt CCrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Winchester, VA
    My Bikes
    Too darn many.. latest count is 11
    Posts
    5,345
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bikinfool View Post
    Further to what Ccrew said (although I wouldn't use the phrase bad to good particularly, maybe adequate to top of the line)
    I dunno if "adequate" covers a Sora FD, I'm more prone to stick with "bad"

    Really though, all kidding aside. I'll agree that most all the Shimano stuff is "adequate" as bikinfool said. And personally from 105 up I don't see night and day differences - and Sora/Tiagra mixes work for prolly millions that ride on a recreational basis.

    -R

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    620
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thanks for nailing it

    HI,
    That was good info for me,when and if I get a new bike thats set up my size I can relax if its ulterga derailers.
    Doug

  6. #6
    I have senior moments... bikinfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Woodside, CA
    My Bikes
    Many
    Posts
    2,153
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CCrew View Post
    I dunno if "adequate" covers a Sora FD, I'm more prone to stick with "bad"

    Really though, all kidding aside. I'll agree that most all the Shimano stuff is "adequate" as bikinfool said. And personally from 105 up I don't see night and day differences - and Sora/Tiagra mixes work for prolly millions that ride on a recreational basis.

    -R
    There's not much to a front derailleur, one of the least performance oriented items on a bike, especially for a two ring setup.

    Quote Originally Posted by djnzlab1 View Post
    HI,
    That was good info for me,when and if I get a new bike thats set up my size I can relax if its ulterga derailers.
    Doug
    Ultegra is very good quality, no problems at all there (often the equivalent of Dura Ace in performance and weight at a significant savings). I've got Ultegra stuff that I've been using for a very long time and it still works great after what 17 years now?
    suum quique
    Mountain bikes: Santa Cruz Hecklers (99, 02, 07), Santa Cruz Nomad, Moots YBB, Trek OCLV Pro Issue, American Breezer
    Road bikes: TST, Trek 2300 (Carbon/Alum)

  7. #7
    biked well well biked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,882
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bikinfool View Post
    I've got Ultegra stuff that I've been using for a very long time and it still works great after what 17 years now?
    Shimano 600 maybe. The name Ultegra wasn't used until the late '90's.

  8. #8
    Senior Member CACycling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Oxnard, CA
    My Bikes
    '08 Fuji Roubaix RC; '07 Schwinn Le Tour GS; '92 Diamond Back Ascent EX
    Posts
    4,449
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't forget Ultegra SL. It falls between Ultegra and DA. As for Sora, I've got a Sora FD on my commuter (triple) and it shifts quite nicely.

  9. #9
    Sometimes knows stuff. rmfnla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    La La Land (We love it!)
    My Bikes
    Gilmour road, Curtlo road
    Posts
    2,538
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CCrew View Post
    I dunno if "adequate" covers a Sora FD, I'm more prone to stick with "bad"

    Really though, all kidding aside. I'll agree that most all the Shimano stuff is "adequate" as bikinfool said. And personally from 105 up I don't see night and day differences - and Sora/Tiagra mixes work for prolly millions that ride on a recreational basis.

    -R
    I'd be VERY surprised if you could tell the difference between Sora & Dura Ace FDs if you shifted blindfolded and all other parts were the same.
    Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...

  10. #10
    Senior Member z415's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Gainesville/Tampa, FL
    My Bikes
    Trek 1000, two mtbs and working on a fixie for commuting.
    Posts
    2,347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^I've used 105, Sora, and Tiagra and the shift feel is almost the same, but the noise is a little different - I do have perceptive ears though...
    Falling is learning...[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]...learn to not fall in a box.
    Any good American will watch THIS -and- WHERE WAS MY BIKE MADE?

  11. #11
    Gouge Away kaliayev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    BFOH
    Posts
    972
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tiagra FDs are ok, but to me the RDs leave a lot to be desired.
    2003 Stevenson Custom Cycles Sportive
    1978 Trek TX700
    1990 Trek 750
    All are frame/frame set builds.

  12. #12
    Senior Member z415's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Gainesville/Tampa, FL
    My Bikes
    Trek 1000, two mtbs and working on a fixie for commuting.
    Posts
    2,347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^The jump from Tiagra to 105 RDs is astronomical.
    Falling is learning...[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]...learn to not fall in a box.
    Any good American will watch THIS -and- WHERE WAS MY BIKE MADE?

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Under the Downunder
    My Bikes
    MTBs, BMX, Pocket MTB
    Posts
    1,014
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Lighter weight, and exceptional durability are usually the factors that make the high-end gizmos pricey... which pro riders need, who clock thousands of kms just in training alone. Plus racers just can't afford to waste all the investment in time, money and training effort, and be forced out of a long awaited race, due to gear failure.

    Weekend warriors should be fine with the "adequate" range. As far as operational efficiency is concerned... Shimano has already sorted that out many years ago and much of their race-technology has already trickled down to the economy range.

    .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •