Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-28-09, 12:24 AM   #1
Abacus
Decrepit Member
Thread Starter
 
Abacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Bikes: 2003 Trek 520, 1996 Trek 370, 1996 Bianchi Osprey, too many others.
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Octalink Question

I have a 2003 Shimano 105 triple crankset. This uses the Octalink V1 BB.

I have the opportunity to acquire a NOS XTR Octalink V1 crankset cheap.

For some reason Shimano specifies that XTR cranks must be fitted to XTR octalink cranks only.

Is there any reason why XTR Octalink V1 cranks shouldn't be interchangeable with the 105 Octalink V1 cranks?

Here is the 105 BB-5500:

http://www.jensonusa.com/store/produ...m+Bracket.aspx





Here is the XTR BB-M952:

http://www.jensonusa.com/store/produ...m+Bracket.aspx





Apart from spindle length, what is the difference, and why would they not be interchangeable for either 105 or XTR cranksets?
Abacus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-09, 12:57 AM   #2
stedalus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 598
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
They're compatible as far as the spline interface goes (I used to have Ultegra cranks with a XTR BB) but the chainline will be a few mm off and you may have chainstay interference. You can find the XTR BBs on ebay for ~$30, so it's not a big deal if you need to change the BB too.
stedalus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-09, 06:37 AM   #3
jccaclimber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Terre Haute, Lafayette, or Indianapolis, IN, depending on the day
Bikes: n, I would like n+1
Posts: 1,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just be sure in case you go to other mountain bike octalink BBs that they are all V1 as V1 is not compatible with V2 (longer splines among other things). As for the two you mentioned, the xtr one is 3mm longer (as labeled in the pic, 109.5,112.5) and so your chainline will be too wide.
jccaclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-09, 07:57 AM   #4
Soil_Sampler
A little North of Hell
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 4,804
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Road V1 triple takes a 118.5 bb
XTR MTB takes either 112.5 or 116
Soil_Sampler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-09, 09:04 AM   #5
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,844
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 66 Post(s)
As Soil sampler noted, The XTR bb is shorter than the 105 triple crank specifies so you may have chainstay clearance problems. Also, is the XTR intended for a 73 mm bb shell instead of a 68 mm?
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-09, 09:06 AM   #6
Soil_Sampler
A little North of Hell
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 4,804
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
73/68 with spacers
Soil_Sampler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:18 PM.