Peugeot Front Derailleur/Frame Dilemma
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Peugeot Front Derailleur/Frame Dilemma
Hey guys! I have a 1984 Peugeot PSV10N which came with a bolt-on Simplex front derailleur...that is, there is actually a threaded fitting on the right side of the seat tube that the derailleur mounts to, instead of a standard braze-on tab or space for a clamp-on (see pics). My problem is that I want to replace this derailleur with a braze-on Campy FD by way of a clamp-on adapter, but the fitting has a little raised piece which I can't work around (again, see pics). I have been thinking about using a dremel to smooth it down so that I could use the braze-on with the adapter, or maybe even some kind of file. If I were careful and removed as little from the frame as possible, would this have any effect on the structural integrity of the frame? Any help would be really appreciated!
CLICK THUMBNAILS TO ENLARGE
The fitting...
The Simplex FD...
The Simplex mounting plate next to the fitting...
The new clamp-on adapter I want to put on...
CLICK THUMBNAILS TO ENLARGE
The fitting...
The Simplex FD...
The Simplex mounting plate next to the fitting...
The new clamp-on adapter I want to put on...
#3
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,911
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3556 Post(s)
Liked 3,332 Times
in
1,899 Posts
Hey guys! I have a 1984 Peugeot PSV10N which came with a bolt-on Simplex front derailleur...that is, there is actually a threaded fitting on the right side of the seat tube that the derailleur mounts to, instead of a standard braze-on tab or space for a clamp-on (see pics). My problem is that I want to replace this derailleur with a braze-on Campy FD by way of a clamp-on adapter, but the fitting has a little raised piece which I can't work around (again, see pics). I have been thinking about using a dremel to smooth it down so that I could use the braze-on with the adapter, or maybe even some kind of file. If I were careful and removed as little from the frame as possible, would this have any effect on the structural integrity of the frame?
#4
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
flian: I have considered that also, but the place on the clamp I would need to bore out is right at its connecting joint.
JohnDThompson: I knew this would come up...the main reason is simply because I want the bike to be completely campy-equipped. I am a complete and utter purist.
JohnDThompson: I knew this would come up...the main reason is simply because I want the bike to be completely campy-equipped. I am a complete and utter purist.
#5
Senior Member
-- 1986 Schwinn Paramount Waterford-made frame
-- Campy Derailleurs, Hubs' and Rims: Early 70s Campy Nuovo Record derailluers with ca 1980 Super Record shift levers; Mid 70s Campy Record Hubs laced to Late 80s Campy rims
-- Suntour Drivetrain: Superbe Pro Crankset (although with early 80s Campy BB) with Winner Pro 6 speed Freewheel (Early 80s-ish)
-- CA 1990 Shimano 600 brakes and levers.
So Suntour makes me go; Campy makes the ride smooth; and Shimano makes me stop.
All that said, I completely understand the desire but would be really hesitant to take dremel to the frame. The purist in me says, above all, respect the frame.
#6
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the input! I'm going down the same type of road, so we'll see how it goes.
Basically what I want to know is how much you can get away with when dremel meets frame. And in this case, I would only be removing that protruded ring on the fitting, so I'm really thinking that if I did just that it would still be fine. Supposing I do a perfect job, everything would still be the same but just without a 1/4" ring coming off the frame about 1/16th of an inch. Any more takers?
Basically what I want to know is how much you can get away with when dremel meets frame. And in this case, I would only be removing that protruded ring on the fitting, so I'm really thinking that if I did just that it would still be fine. Supposing I do a perfect job, everything would still be the same but just without a 1/4" ring coming off the frame about 1/16th of an inch. Any more takers?
#7
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,911
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3556 Post(s)
Liked 3,332 Times
in
1,899 Posts
Thanks for the input! I'm going down the same type of road, so we'll see how it goes.
Basically what I want to know is how much you can get away with when dremel meets frame. And in this case, I would only be removing that protruded ring on the fitting, so I'm really thinking that if I did just that it would still be fine. Supposing I do a perfect job, everything would still be the same but just without a 1/4" ring coming off the frame about 1/16th of an inch. Any more takers?
Basically what I want to know is how much you can get away with when dremel meets frame. And in this case, I would only be removing that protruded ring on the fitting, so I'm really thinking that if I did just that it would still be fine. Supposing I do a perfect job, everything would still be the same but just without a 1/4" ring coming off the frame about 1/16th of an inch. Any more takers?
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts