Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Freewheel & derailleur compatibility question

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Freewheel & derailleur compatibility question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-09, 09:09 PM
  #1  
#5639
Thread Starter
 
robertkat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Freewheel & derailleur compatibility question

Need some help on this. Currently have a bike that is equipped with Campag 980 with a 52-42 crank and 13-24 freewheel. I wanted to get a slightly lower gear and I was looking at installing a 13-28 freewheel and going to 7 speed. The mechanic at my LBS said it should be able to handle a 28 tooth max. Also I've been made a sweet deal on NOS Suntour Sprint 9000 derailleurs and shifters. Would either of the rear mechs be ok with the 28 tooth on the rear? I would imagine I just have to stay off the large ring in front when on the larger two cogs in back.
robertkat is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 09:40 PM
  #2  
I suck, but you're worse
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 672

Bikes: Motobecane Fantom Uno-Got rid of the rest when I moved to LA:(

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Campy has a differnt cog spacing than Shimano so if you are putting a Shimano compatible freewheel on the back you will need to replace the Campy rear mech or switch your shifters to friction only. I wouldn't mix Campy and Shimano drive train components, you are asking for headaches. AS far as the tooth size is concerened are you worried about the rear mech chain tensioner being stretched too far? It is very possible, but if you stay off the large front and large back at the same time you should be ok. DOn't let anyone else ride the bike without telling them about this gear "quirk" though.
sooprvylyn is offline  
Old 03-12-09, 09:59 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by sooprvylyn
I wouldn't mix Campy and Shimano drive train components, you are asking for headaches.
I agree but the OP did not say anything about using Shimano or indexing.
Al1943 is offline  
Old 03-12-09, 10:30 AM
  #4  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
Originally Posted by robertkat
Need some help on this. Currently have a bike that is equipped with Campag 980 with a 52-42 crank and 13-24 freewheel. I wanted to get a slightly lower gear and I was looking at installing a 13-28 freewheel and going to 7 speed. The mechanic at my LBS said it should be able to handle a 28 tooth max. Also I've been made a sweet deal on NOS Suntour Sprint 9000 derailleurs and shifters. Would either of the rear mechs be ok with the 28 tooth on the rear? I would imagine I just have to stay off the large ring in front when on the larger two cogs in back.
According to Sutherland's the 980 should be able to handle a 28T freewheel and 26T total capacity (difference between small and large freewheel cogs + difference between smallest and largest chainrings). Your proposed total capacity is (28-13)+(52-42)=25 so you should be ok. Large-large and small-small combinations should be avoided in any case.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 03-12-09, 10:31 AM
  #5  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
Originally Posted by sooprvylyn
Campy has a differnt cog spacing than Shimano so if you are putting a Shimano compatible freewheel on the back you will need to replace the Campy rear mech or switch your shifters to friction only.
The 980 isn't an indexed derailleur so this concern is moot...
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 03-12-09, 10:31 AM
  #6  
Real Men Ride Ordinaries
 
fuzz2050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,723
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
The 34 tooth freewheel gives me a bit of pause, it wouldn't surprise me is neither derailer could take it. Maybe your better off with something a little smaller like a 30.
fuzz2050 is offline  
Old 03-12-09, 04:28 PM
  #7  
#5639
Thread Starter
 
robertkat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks guys. I figured I should be ok. It's friction, no indexing, regardless if I change to the Suntour parts and/or 7 speed. I ask about going to a 28 tooth max as I haven't seen any freewheels with a 26, er, at least any that are worth it.
robertkat is offline  
Old 03-12-09, 05:06 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzz2050
The 34 tooth freewheel gives me a bit of pause,
???
Al1943 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.