approx. circumference for 700x26C tires?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus Elite '03
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
approx. circumference for 700x26C tires?
hello all. i purchased a computer (cateye...) for my bike, and its tire circum.(measurement) chart didn't note the 700x26C size.
does anyone own similiar sized tires and have calculated a circumference? i'd really appreciate your help and feedback. thx.
regards,
ben
does anyone own similiar sized tires and have calculated a circumference? i'd really appreciate your help and feedback. thx.
regards,
ben
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Delaware
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
The ideal method of determining circumference is to do a rollout. Worth the effort, otherwise, the formula for calculating circumference is Pi x Dia.
#3
8speed DinoSORAs
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oxford, UK or Mountain View, Ca
Posts: 2,749
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sigma sport manuals for computers are available on-line, and contain reference data for tire circumference. Check out this link:
https://www.sigmasport.com/media/prod...g_bc800_00.pdf
It has data for 700x23, 700x25 and 700x28. It is pretty easy to interpolate this and get a useable number e.g. take the difference between the '25 & '28 widths and add 1 third of this number to the 700x25 figure (round up/down as appropriate).
In fact this works out as one or two parts in 2146-ish, which is below 0.5%. According to changes in your tire pressure etc., which affect circumference it is expecting a lot to get computers to read to this sort of accuracy so you would be not too far out just picking the closest tire size. It would be a good idea to compare this to a rollout measurement as fujibike suggested.
Cheers,
Ed
https://www.sigmasport.com/media/prod...g_bc800_00.pdf
It has data for 700x23, 700x25 and 700x28. It is pretty easy to interpolate this and get a useable number e.g. take the difference between the '25 & '28 widths and add 1 third of this number to the 700x25 figure (round up/down as appropriate).
In fact this works out as one or two parts in 2146-ish, which is below 0.5%. According to changes in your tire pressure etc., which affect circumference it is expecting a lot to get computers to read to this sort of accuracy so you would be not too far out just picking the closest tire size. It would be a good idea to compare this to a rollout measurement as fujibike suggested.
Cheers,
Ed
__________________
Get a bicycle. You will certainly not regret it, if you live.
Get a bicycle. You will certainly not regret it, if you live.
#4
cycles per second
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930
Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
48 Posts
A good way to get a reasonably accurate number is to take the bead diameter, add twice the tire width, and multiply by pi. Thus 700x26 is approximately (622+2*26)*3.1416 = 2117mm
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 816
Bikes: Raleigh, Benotto, Schwinn, Trek
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have accurately measure 700x25c tyres mounted on Mavic Open Pros. They measure 2096mm with a 163 lb. rider mounted. Since you said approximately, this ought to get you to within a few millimeters.
#6
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,799
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,326 Times
in
837 Posts
Tyre pressure variations probably affect the effective circumference by several mm.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 604
Bikes: LeMond Zurich
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Find a clean level stretch of pavement. Place the front tire with the valve at the bottom of the wheel. Make am chalk mark where the valve section of the wheel touches the road. Ride as straight as possible (don't walk the bike) for ten rotaions of the front tire. Mark the pavement again with the valve closest to the pavement. Measure the distance between the chalk marks. Average several trials and divide by ten.
__________________
I’m not familiar precisely with exactly what I said, but I stand by what I said whatever it was.
I’m not familiar precisely with exactly what I said, but I stand by what I said whatever it was.