Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    R4550 compact crank- question

    My LBS put on a Tiagra 4550 Compact crank50/34 on my Cervelo Soloist SL -- I had a Dura Ace crank 53/39 with a 12/27 cassette. The problem I first experienced with the 4550 was that I could not get into the 27 cog without the chain jumping off the big chain ring. After many trips to different bike shops it works now but I dont know exactly why nor hasnt anyone told me why .

    After looking through this forum I see that the 4550 is for a nine speed. It works now but what are your thoughts on this whole thing besides having a low level used crank on such a great bike.
    Would appreciate your thoughts -- the smaller crank seems to work well for me , thinking of going for a new Ultegra compact.

  2. #2
    Senior Member joejack951's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1
    Posts
    9,491
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sounds like the front derailler needs to be positioned better. I've had a similar problem using the smallest cog when in the middle ring of a triple crank. Fixed it by moving the front derailler a little closer to the chain, but not so close that it made any noise.

    The crank being 9 speed should have absolutely nothing to do with it. The only downside to using a 9 speed crank with a 10 speed chain would be slightly slower shifting. The only downside to using Tiagra in place of Dura Ace is some weight. How much do you care about a few ounces?

    According to weightweenies, Tiagra standard crank is 975 grams with BB and Ultegra SL Compact FC-6650-G is 811 grams with BB. 5.7 ounce difference.
    Last edited by joejack951; 05-19-09 at 08:09 PM.

  3. #3
    AEO
    AEO is offline
    Senior Member AEO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well, the 34T inner ring is the same thing for 9 and 10sp

    only the outer ring is different between the models.
    Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
    http://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You said the 9 speed crank should have no problem handling the 10 speed cassette.That is what my worry has been after reading that it was designed for 9 speed. i have been concerned that the nine speed thing was part of my problem,. Thanks-the weight thing is not a big factor. Seems to be working ok now.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    9,429
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Easy solution- don't use the 27 cog while on the big ring. That's cross-chaining, creating too large of an angle which increases friction, decreases efficiency, and shortens the life of the drivetrain.

    Al

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You are absolutely right about the cross chaining. But I still would like to be able to get into the 27 with out the chain jumping.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •